Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Complaint - Illinois

Illinois Personal Injury Updated July 9, 2026 Free Word and PDF

UNINSURED / UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COMPLAINT

Table of Contents

  1. Caption
  2. Parties
  3. Jurisdiction and Venue
  4. General Allegations
  5. Policy Identification and Coverage
  6. UM vs. UIM Status
  7. Arbitration Prerequisite
  8. Count I — Breach of Contract (UM/UIM Benefits)
  9. Count II — Statutory Bad Faith (215 ILCS 5/155)
  10. Damages
  11. Demand for Jury Trial
  12. Prayer for Relief

Caption

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF [COUNTY NAME] COUNTY, ILLINOIS

[____] JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

[PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], Case No.: [________________________________]
Plaintiff,
v.
[INSURANCE COMPANY NAME], COMPLAINT AT LAW
Defendant. (Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist)

Parties

  1. Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME] ("Plaintiff"), is an individual residing in [CITY], [COUNTY] County, Illinois, and is an insured under the automobile insurance policy described herein.

  2. Defendant, [INSURANCE COMPANY NAME] ("Defendant Insurer"), is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of [STATE OF INCORPORATION], authorized to transact insurance business in the State of Illinois, with its principal office at [INSURER ADDRESS].

  3. [JOHN/JANE DOE] ("Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist") is an individual who, at all relevant times, operated a motor vehicle [☐ without liability insurance / ☐ with liability insurance inadequate to compensate Plaintiff's damages].


Jurisdiction and Venue

  1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the Illinois Constitution, Art. VI, § 9, and 735 ILCS 5/2-209.

  2. The amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional minimum of this Court.

  3. Venue is proper in [COUNTY] County pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-101 because [☐ the transaction or some part thereof out of which the cause of action arose occurred in this county / ☐ Defendant resides or conducts business in this county].


General Allegations

  1. On or about [DATE OF ACCIDENT], at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was [☐ operating / ☐ a passenger in] a motor vehicle on [STREET/HIGHWAY/ROUTE], in [CITY/VILLAGE/TOWNSHIP], [COUNTY] County, Illinois.

  2. At said time and place, the Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist negligently operated a motor vehicle, proximately causing a collision with Plaintiff's vehicle.

  3. The Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist was negligent in one or more of the following ways:

☐ Operated a vehicle at an excessive rate of speed
☐ Failed to yield the right of way
☐ Failed to keep a proper lookout
☐ Followed too closely in violation of 625 ILCS 5/11-710
☐ Drove under the influence of alcohol or drugs in violation of 625 ILCS 5/11-501
☐ Disobeyed a traffic control device
☐ Made an improper lane change
☐ Used a wireless telephone in violation of 625 ILCS 5/12-610.2
☐ Other: [________________________________]

  1. As a direct and proximate result of the above-described negligence, Plaintiff sustained serious personal injuries and damages.

Policy Identification and Coverage

  1. At the time of the accident, Plaintiff was insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by Defendant Insurer, Policy No. [POLICY NUMBER], effective from [POLICY START DATE] to [POLICY END DATE] (the "Policy").

  2. The Policy provides uninsured motorist ("UM") bodily injury coverage with limits of $[UM LIMIT PER PERSON] per person / $[UM LIMIT PER ACCIDENT] per accident, as required by 215 ILCS 5/143a.

  3. The Policy provides underinsured motorist ("UIM") bodily injury coverage with limits of $[UIM LIMIT PER PERSON] per person / $[UIM LIMIT PER ACCIDENT] per accident, pursuant to 215 ILCS 5/143a-2.

  4. Plaintiff has paid all premiums due under the Policy and has complied with all conditions precedent.

  5. [Plaintiff did not make the written lower-limit election or rejection of additional UM coverage described in 215 ILCS 5/143a-2(2) / the Policy provides UM only at the statutory minimum and no UIM coverage is alleged / other policy-specific allegation: [DESCRIBE]].

  6. Section 143a requires UM coverage at least at the Section 7-203 minimums. Section 143a-2 generally requires additional UM coverage equal to the Policy's bodily-injury liability limits unless reduced or rejected in the writing described in subsection (2), and requires UIM coverage equal to UM coverage when the UM limits exceed the statutory minimums. The Policy's applicable limits and elections are: [DESCRIBE AND ATTACH].


UM vs. UIM Status

Select one:

☐ Uninsured Motorist (UM) Claim:

  1. The at-fault motorist was uninsured at the time of the accident in that [☐ no bodily injury liability policy was in effect / ☐ the at-fault motorist is unknown (hit-and-run) / ☐ the at-fault motorist's insurer denied coverage or is insolvent].

☐ Underinsured Motorist (UIM) Claim:

  1. The at-fault motorist maintained bodily injury liability coverage with limits of $[TORTFEASOR POLICY LIMIT], which is insufficient to compensate Plaintiff for the full extent of damages sustained.

  2. Plaintiff has exhausted the at-fault motorist's bodily injury liability limits and received $[AMOUNT RECOVERED FROM TORTFEASOR] in [☐ settlement / ☐ judgment].

  3. Defendant Insurer was provided with timely written notice and opportunity to consent to the settlement with the tortfeasor's insurer.

  4. Pursuant to 215 ILCS 5/143a-2, UIM coverage supplements the difference between the tortfeasor's insurance limits and Plaintiff's actual damages, up to the UIM policy limits.


Arbitration Prerequisite

  1. The Policy contains an arbitration clause, as required by 215 ILCS 5/143a, providing that disputes regarding UM/UIM coverage and the amount of damages shall be submitted to arbitration.

  2. [☐ Plaintiff has demanded arbitration of the amount of damages and/or coverage dispute in accordance with the Policy and 215 ILCS 5/143a, and this Count is brought to enforce an arbitration award that Defendant Insurer has failed to pay / ☐ The Policy's arbitration clause does not apply because this action presents solely a coverage question properly resolved by declaratory judgment / ☐ Defendant Insurer has waived or is estopped from asserting the Policy's arbitration requirement / ☐ The parties have agreed in writing to resolve this dispute in a judicial forum in lieu of arbitration].


Count I

Breach of Contract (UM/UIM Benefits)

  1. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 23.

  2. The Policy constitutes a valid and enforceable contract between Plaintiff and Defendant Insurer.

  3. Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants, and promises required under the Policy, including any applicable arbitration prerequisite described above, or has been excused from performance.

  4. Defendant Insurer has breached the Policy by failing and refusing to pay UM/UIM benefits owed to Plaintiff despite proper and timely demand.

  5. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Insurer's breach, Plaintiff has been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial.


Count II

Statutory Bad Faith (215 ILCS 5/155)

  1. Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 28.

  2. Section 155 of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/155) provides for additional relief when an insurer's delay or denial in settling a claim is vexatious and unreasonable. Recovery under Section 155 is an extra-contractual remedy that presupposes an underlying action or award on the Policy; it does not itself create a stand-alone cause of action independent of the breach-of-contract or arbitration-enforcement claim asserted above.

  3. Defendant Insurer's conduct in handling Plaintiff's UM/UIM claim has been vexatious and unreasonable in that:

☐ Defendant unreasonably delayed investigation of the claim
☐ Defendant denied benefits without a bona fide coverage dispute
☐ Defendant failed to make a reasonable settlement offer despite clear liability and damages
☐ Defendant forced Plaintiff to incur unnecessary litigation expenses
☐ Other: [________________________________]

  1. As a result of Defendant Insurer's vexatious and unreasonable conduct, Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and other costs, plus an amount not to exceed the lesser of: (a) 60% of the amount the Court or jury finds Plaintiff is entitled to recover against Defendant Insurer, exclusive of costs; (b) $60,000; or (c) the excess of the amount Plaintiff is entitled to recover, exclusive of costs, over the amount, if any, Defendant Insurer offered in settlement of the claim prior to this action. 215 ILCS 5/155(1).

Damages

  1. As a result of the accident and Defendant Insurer's breaches, Plaintiff has suffered the following damages:

☐ Past medical expenses: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Future medical expenses: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Past lost wages/earnings: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Future lost wages/earning capacity: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Pain and suffering (past and future): $[AMOUNT]
☐ Emotional distress: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Disfigurement: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Disability (temporary and/or permanent): $[AMOUNT]
☐ Loss of normal life: $[AMOUNT]
☐ Loss of consortium (if applicable): $[AMOUNT]
☐ Section 155 penalties (not to exceed the lesser of 60% of the recovery, $60,000, or the excess of the recovery over Defendant's pre-suit settlement offer, plus attorney's fees)
☐ Prejudgment interest
☐ Costs of suit


Demand for Jury Trial

Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.


Prayer for Relief

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF FULL NAME], prays for judgment against Defendant Insurer as follows:

  1. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
  2. UM/UIM policy benefits in the full amount owed under the Policy;
  3. Section 155 statutory penalties, not to exceed the lesser of 60% of the amount recovered, $60,000, or the excess of the recovery over Defendant Insurer's pre-suit settlement offer;
  4. Reasonable attorney's fees and costs pursuant to 215 ILCS 5/155;
  5. Prejudgment interest;
  6. Costs of suit; and
  7. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and equitable.

Respectfully submitted,

[ATTORNEY NAME], ARDC No. [ARDC NUMBER]
[FIRM NAME]
[FIRM ADDRESS]
[CITY], Illinois [ZIP CODE]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff


State-Specific Notes — Illinois

Topic Detail
UM Mandatory? Section 143a requires bodily-injury UM coverage at least at the Section 7-203 minimums. Under Section 143a-2(1)-(2), additional UM equal to bodily-injury liability limits applies unless the insured makes the specified written lower-limit election or rejection.
UIM Mandatory? Section 143a-2(4) requires UIM coverage equal to UM coverage when the UM limits exceed the Section 7-203 minimums; confirm the Policy and any written UM election.
Minimum Limits $25,000/$50,000 bodily injury (625 ILCS 5/7-601)
UM Limits Default Equal to BI liability limits unless insured elects lower in writing
Stacking Limited stacking permitted depending on policy language and number of vehicles
Arbitration STATUTORILY MANDATED — 215 ILCS 5/143a requires every policy to include an arbitration clause covering disputes over UM/UIM coverage and the amount of damages; arbitration (typically via the American Arbitration Association or a three-arbitrator panel) is generally a condition precedent to a civil action for benefits, subject to a contractual demand deadline (often 2 years) that can be shorter than the 10-year written-contract limitation period under 735 ILCS 5/13-206 (see Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Whitehead, 2012 IL 113365)
Setoff / Offset UIM benefits typically reduced by amounts recovered from tortfeasor (policy-dependent)
Workers' Comp Setoff ALLOWED — Illinois courts have held UIM/UM insurers may set off workers' compensation benefits received by the insured to prevent double recovery (Sulser v. Country Mutual Ins. Co., 147 Ill. 2d 548 (1992); Hoglund v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 148 Ill. 2d 272 (1992)). NOTE: Thounsavath v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2018 IL 122558, addresses a driver-exclusion endorsement improperly denying UIM coverage under 215 ILCS 5/143a-2 — it does not concern workers' compensation setoffs and should not be cited for that proposition
Bad Faith Statutory remedy under 215 ILCS 5/155 — capped at the lesser of 60% of the recovery, $60,000, or the excess of the recovery over the insurer's pre-suit settlement offer, plus reasonable attorney's fees; a stand-alone Section 155 claim generally requires a live or successful underlying action on the policy (Moles v. Illinois Farmers Ins. Co., 2023 IL App (1st) 220853)
Hit-and-Run Physical contact generally required; notice requirements vary by policy

Sources and References

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)Choose a plan

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
uninsured_motorist_complaint_il.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Draft it in the editor

The AI drafts each section from your answers and you review every word. Drafting from scratch takes hours; finish yours for $99 one time.

  • Built on this template
    Uses the Illinois version and the statutes it cites.
  • Formatted like the template
    Captions, numbering and layout stay intact.
  • AI editing
    Rewrite any section from your own notes.
  • Export as PDF and Word
    Yours to review, sign, or file.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About this template

Last updated
July 9, 2026
Jurisdiction
Illinois
Category
Personal Injury

Legal authority

  • 215 ILCS 5/143a (UM Coverage; mandatory policy arbitration clause)
  • 215 ILCS 5/143a-2 (UIM Coverage)
  • 215 ILCS 5/155 (Attorney Fees / Vexatious and Unreasonable Delay Penalty)
  • 625 ILCS 5/7-601 (Financial Responsibility Minimums)
  • 735 ILCS 5/2-101 (Venue)
  • 735 ILCS 5/13-206 (10-Year Limitation on Written Contracts)

Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.

Not legal advice

This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Checked against the law it cites

The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.

Draft your Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Complaint in the editor

Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.