UNINSURED/UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COMPLAINT
District of Columbia Superior Court
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Insurance Policy Information
- Coverage Type — UM vs. UIM
- Facts of the Accident
- Uninsured/Underinsured Status of At-Fault Driver
- Exhaustion of Liability Coverage
- Breach of Contract
- Bad Faith (If Applicable)
- Damages
- Stacking Allegations
- Arbitration vs. Litigation
- Prayer for Relief
- Verification
- District of Columbia Practice Notes
1. CAPTION
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CIVIL DIVISION
| [PLAINTIFF FULL LEGAL NAME] | |
| [________________________________] | |
| [________________________________] | Civil Action No. [________________] |
| Washington, DC [__________] | |
| Plaintiff, | |
| v. | |
| [INSURANCE COMPANY FULL LEGAL NAME] | |
| [________________________________] | |
| [________________________________] | |
| Defendant. |
2. PARTIES
2.1 Plaintiff
-
Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF FULL LEGAL NAME], is an individual who at all relevant times resided at [________________________________], Washington, DC [__________].
-
Plaintiff was, at the time of the incident described herein, an insured under a motor vehicle insurance policy issued by Defendant.
2.2 Defendant — Insurance Company
- Defendant, [INSURANCE COMPANY FULL LEGAL NAME], is an insurance company organized under the laws of [________________________________], authorized to conduct business and issue motor vehicle insurance policies in the District of Columbia, with its principal place of business at [________________________________].
3. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to D.C. Code § 11-921, as the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional minimum.
-
Venue is proper in this Court because the insurance policy was issued and delivered in the District of Columbia and/or the accident giving rise to this claim occurred within the District of Columbia.
4. INSURANCE POLICY INFORMATION
-
At all relevant times, Plaintiff was insured under a motor vehicle insurance policy issued by Defendant, Policy No. [________________________________], with an effective period from [__/__/____] to [__/__/____].
-
The policy provided the following relevant coverages:
☐ Uninsured Motorist Bodily Injury: $[________] per person / $[________] per accident
☐ Uninsured Motorist Property Damage: $[________] per accident (subject to $200 deductible per D.C. Code § 31-2406(f)(1))
☐ Underinsured Motorist Coverage: $[________] per person / $[________] per accident
☐ Personal Injury Protection (PIP): $[________]
- Plaintiff paid all required premiums and complied with all conditions of the policy.
5. COVERAGE TYPE — UM vs. UIM
- This claim is brought under (select applicable):
☐ Uninsured Motorist (UM) Coverage — The at-fault driver maintained no applicable bodily injury liability insurance at the time of the accident.
☐ Underinsured Motorist (UIM) Coverage — The at-fault driver maintained bodily injury liability insurance in an amount insufficient to compensate Plaintiff for the full extent of damages sustained.
☐ Uninsured Motorist (UM) Coverage — Hit-and-Run — The at-fault vehicle left the scene and cannot be identified, qualifying as an "uninsured motor vehicle" under D.C. Code § 31-2406(f)(2).
6. FACTS OF THE ACCIDENT
-
On or about [__/__/____], at approximately [____] ☐ a.m. ☐ p.m., Plaintiff was operating/occupying a motor vehicle at or near [________________________________], Washington, DC.
-
At said time and place, a motor vehicle operated by [AT-FAULT DRIVER NAME, if known] (hereinafter "Tortfeasor") struck Plaintiff's vehicle.
-
The collision occurred under the following circumstances: [________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________] -
The Tortfeasor was negligent in one or more of the following respects:
☐ Failing to maintain a proper lookout
☐ Failing to yield the right-of-way
☐ Operating a vehicle at an excessive speed
☐ Following too closely
☐ Operating a vehicle while impaired
☐ Violating applicable traffic laws, specifically: [________________________________]
☐ Other: [________________________________]
- As a direct and proximate result of the Tortfeasor's negligence, Plaintiff sustained serious bodily injuries and damages.
7. UNINSURED/UNDERINSURED STATUS OF AT-FAULT DRIVER
- The Tortfeasor's vehicle qualifies as an uninsured/underinsured motor vehicle because (select applicable):
☐ No bodily injury liability insurance was in effect at the time of the accident
☐ The applicable insurer has denied coverage
☐ The applicable insurer is insolvent
☐ The vehicle is a hit-and-run vehicle whose owner/operator cannot be identified
☐ The liability coverage limits ($[________]) are insufficient to compensate Plaintiff's damages
- [If UIM:] The Tortfeasor carried bodily injury liability insurance through [________________________________] with limits of $[________] per person / $[________] per accident, which are insufficient to compensate Plaintiff for the damages sustained.
8. EXHAUSTION OF LIABILITY COVERAGE (UIM Claims)
-
[If applicable:] Plaintiff has exhausted the Tortfeasor's bodily injury liability coverage by receiving payment of $[________], representing the full policy limits available.
-
Despite such payment, Plaintiff's damages exceed the Tortfeasor's liability coverage limits, entitling Plaintiff to UIM benefits under the policy.
9. COUNT I — BREACH OF CONTRACT
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
-
The insurance policy between Plaintiff and Defendant constitutes a binding contract.
-
Plaintiff has performed all conditions required under the policy, including timely notice of the claim, cooperation with the investigation, and payment of all premiums.
-
Defendant has breached the insurance contract by failing and refusing to pay UM/UIM benefits to which Plaintiff is entitled under the policy and D.C. Code § 31-2406.
-
As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's breach, Plaintiff has suffered damages in an amount to be proven at trial.
10. COUNT II — BAD FAITH (If Applicable)
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates all preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
-
Defendant's refusal to pay UM/UIM benefits was unreasonable, without proper cause, and constituted bad faith, including but not limited to:
☐ Failing to conduct a reasonable investigation
☐ Unreasonably delaying payment of benefits
☐ Denying the claim without a reasonable basis
☐ Failing to provide a timely and adequate explanation of denial
☐ Other: [________________________________]
11. DAMAGES
- As a direct and proximate result of the accident and Defendant's failure to pay benefits, Plaintiff has suffered the following damages:
☐ Past medical expenses: $[________]
☐ Future medical expenses: $[________]
☐ Past lost wages/income: $[________]
☐ Future lost earning capacity: $[________]
☐ Pain and suffering: $[________]
☐ Mental anguish and emotional distress: $[________]
☐ Property damage (subject to $200 deductible): $[________]
☐ Loss of consortium (if applicable): $[________]
☐ Punitive damages (bad faith claim only): $[________]
☐ Attorney fees and costs: $[________]
12. STACKING ALLEGATIONS
-
☐ Plaintiff asserts the right to stack UM/UIM coverages across multiple vehicles and/or policies.
-
☐ Plaintiff acknowledges that D.C. Code § 31-2406(f)(4) permits anti-stacking provisions, but contends that the policy at issue does not contain a valid anti-stacking clause.
13. ARBITRATION VS. LITIGATION
-
☐ The policy does not contain a mandatory arbitration clause, and Plaintiff elects to pursue this claim through litigation.
-
☐ The policy contains an arbitration clause, but Plaintiff contends it is unenforceable because: [________________________________]
-
☐ Plaintiff has previously submitted this claim to arbitration. The arbitration resulted in [________________________________], and Plaintiff now seeks judicial review/enforcement.
14. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor and against Defendant as follows:
a. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but not less than $[________];
b. UM/UIM policy benefits in the full amount owed under the policy;
c. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as permitted by law;
d. Punitive damages for bad faith conduct (if applicable);
e. Reasonable attorney fees and costs of suit;
f. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
15. VERIFICATION
I, [PLAINTIFF FULL LEGAL NAME], declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the District of Columbia that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
Date: [__/__/____]
Signature: [________________________________]
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
[________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
Washington, DC [__________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
D.C. Bar No.: [________________________________]
16. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRACTICE NOTES
Statutory Framework:
- D.C. Code § 31-2406(f) mandates UM coverage for all motor vehicle policies in D.C.
- UIM coverage is optional but must be offered by insurers under § 31-2406(c-1).
- Minimum UM limits: $25,000/$50,000 BI; $5,000 PD (with $200 deductible).
- Optional higher UM limits: up to $100,000/$300,000 BI; $25,000 PD.
Anti-Stacking:
- D.C. Code § 31-2406(f)(4) expressly permits anti-stacking clauses in policies.
Statute of Limitations:
- The general statute of limitations for personal injury in D.C. is three (3) years (D.C. Code § 12-301(8)).
- Contract claims carry a three (3) year limitation (D.C. Code § 12-301(7)).
No-Fault / PIP Interaction:
- D.C. is a no-fault jurisdiction. PIP benefits must be exhausted or coordinated with UM/UIM claims as applicable under D.C. Code § 31-2404.
Hit-and-Run Claims:
- Physical contact with the unidentified vehicle is generally required unless the claimant can provide corroborating evidence.
Filing Location:
- D.C. Superior Court, Civil Division, for claims exceeding $10,000.
- Small Claims Branch for claims up to $10,000.
SOURCES AND REFERENCES
Need help customizing this document?
Get 3 days of intelligent editing. Tailor every section to your specific case.