Trademark Cease and Desist - Online Marketplace (Arkansas)
TRADEMARK CEASE AND DESIST LETTER — ONLINE MARKETPLACE INFRINGEMENT
STATE OF ARKANSAS — FEDERAL AND STATE LAW
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
AND VIA EMAIL TO: [________________________________]
Date: [__/__/____]
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
TO:
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Seller / Infringer Name | [________________________________] |
| Seller Username / Store Name | [________________________________] |
| Marketplace Platform | [________________________________] |
| Seller Address (if known) | [________________________________] |
| Seller Email (if known) | [________________________________] |
FROM:
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Law Firm / Attorney Name | [________________________________] |
| Arkansas Bar Number | [________________________________] |
| Address | [________________________________] |
| Telephone | [________________________________] |
| [________________________________] | |
| Client (Trademark Owner) | [________________________________] |
RE: DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST — Unauthorized Use of the [________________________________] Trademark(s) on [________________________________] Online Marketplace — Violations of Federal Lanham Act and Arkansas State Law
PART I: LEGAL FRAMEWORK — FEDERAL AND ARKANSAS STATE LAW
A. Federal Trademark Protection — The Lanham Act
This firm represents [________________________________] ("Our Client" or "Trademark Owner") in connection with the protection and enforcement of its trademark rights under both federal and Arkansas state law. This letter constitutes formal notice and demand that you immediately cease and desist from all unauthorized use of Our Client's trademark(s) on the [________________________________] online marketplace.
The Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., provides the following protections:
- 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1): Prohibits use of any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in commerce where such use is likely to cause confusion
- 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a): Prohibits false designation of origin and misleading descriptions of fact in commerce
- 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c): Protects famous marks against dilution by blurring or tarnishment
- 15 U.S.C. § 1117: Provides recovery of profits, damages (up to treble), costs, and attorneys' fees in exceptional cases
- 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c): Statutory damages of $1,000 to $200,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods ($2,000,000 for willful counterfeiting)
B. Arkansas Trademark Act — Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-101 et seq.
Arkansas provides state trademark registration and protection under Title 4, Subtitle 6, Chapter 71 of the Arkansas Code:
- Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-101 — Definitions: Defines "trademark," "service mark," "mark," "trade name," and related terms for purposes of Arkansas law
- Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-201 — Registration: Provides for registration of trademarks with the Arkansas Secretary of State
- Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-203 — Duration and Renewal: State registrations are valid for ten years with renewal
- Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-113 — Infringement: A person commits trademark infringement under Arkansas law when the person uses, without consent of the registrant, any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, distribution, offering for sale, or advertising of goods or services where such use is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception
- Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-214 — Remedies: Provides comprehensive remedies including:
- Injunctive relief to prevent further infringement
- Recovery of all profits derived from the wrongful use
- Recovery of damages sustained by the trademark owner
- Court-ordered destruction of counterfeits and imitations
- Reasonable attorneys' fees in the court's discretion
- In cases involving use of a counterfeit mark, the court may award treble damages
C. Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act — Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-101 et seq.
The Arkansas DTPA is a significant enforcement tool for trademark infringement in online marketplaces:
- Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-107 — Deceptive and Unconscionable Trade Practices: The following practices are declared unlawful:
- (a)(1): Knowingly making a false representation as to the characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, alterations, source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods or services
- (a)(2): Knowingly making a false representation as to the source of goods
- (a)(3): Advertising goods with intent not to sell them as advertised
- (a)(4): Knowingly making false representations as to affiliation, connection, association, certification, or endorsement
-
(a)(10): Engaging in unconscionable, false, or deceptive act or practice in business, commerce, or trade
-
Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-113 — Private Right of Action: Any person who suffers actual damage or injury as a result of an offense or violation under this chapter may bring an action for recovery of:
- Actual damages
- Reasonable attorneys' fees
-
The court in its discretion may also award an additional penalty not to exceed 10 times the actual damages proved in an amount the court deems proper
-
Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-104 — Attorney General Enforcement: The Arkansas Attorney General has authority to investigate and bring actions to restrain deceptive trade practices, and may seek civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation
D. Arkansas Criminal Counterfeiting — Ark. Code Ann. § 5-37-213
Arkansas criminalizes trademark counterfeiting. A person commits the offense of counterfeiting if the person intentionally manufactures, sells, offers for sale, or possesses with intent to sell any goods bearing a counterfeit trademark. Willful counterfeiting is classified as a misdemeanor, with enhanced penalties for repeat offenses or large-scale operations.
E. Contributory Infringement and First Sale Doctrine
Under Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010), marketplace platforms may be liable for contributory infringement when they have specific knowledge of infringement and fail to act. The first sale doctrine permits resale of genuine goods but does not protect sale of counterfeit or materially different goods. See Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 568 U.S. 519 (2013).
PART II: TRADEMARK OWNERSHIP AND REGISTRATION DETAILS
Federal Registration(s)
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Mark | [________________________________] |
| USPTO Registration No. | [________________________________] |
| Registration Date | [__/__/____] |
| International Class(es) | [________________________________] |
| Goods / Services | [________________________________] |
| Date of First Use in Commerce | [__/__/____] |
| Status | ☐ Live / Registered ☐ Incontestable (Section 15) |
Additional Federal Registration(s) (if applicable)
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Mark | [________________________________] |
| USPTO Registration No. | [________________________________] |
| Registration Date | [__/__/____] |
| International Class(es) | [________________________________] |
| Goods / Services | [________________________________] |
Arkansas State Registration (if applicable)
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Mark | [________________________________] |
| Arkansas Registration No. | [________________________________] |
| Registration Date | [__/__/____] |
| Classification | [________________________________] |
| Registered with | Arkansas Secretary of State |
Mark Type and Strength
☐ Word Mark ☐ Design Mark (Logo) ☐ Composite Mark ☐ Trade Dress
Our Client's mark is:
☐ Arbitrary or fanciful ☐ Suggestive ☐ Descriptive with secondary meaning ☐ Famous mark (dilution protection)
Our Client has continuously used the [________________________________] mark in interstate and intrastate commerce since [__/__/____], including sales to Arkansas consumers, and has invested approximately $[________________________________] in marketing and brand development. Our Client maintains [________________________________] in Arkansas, including [________________________________].
PART III: IDENTIFICATION OF INFRINGING LISTINGS
Infringing Listing Detail Table
| No. | Listing URL / ASIN / Item ID | Product Title | Seller Price | Date Discovered | Screenshot Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | $[____] | [__/__/____] | Exhibit A-1 |
| 2 | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | $[____] | [__/__/____] | Exhibit A-2 |
| 3 | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | $[____] | [__/__/____] | Exhibit A-3 |
| 4 | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | $[____] | [__/__/____] | Exhibit A-4 |
| 5 | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | $[____] | [__/__/____] | Exhibit A-5 |
Nature of Infringement
☐ Identical reproduction of the registered mark on goods
☐ Confusingly similar mark or misspelling variation
☐ Use of mark in product title, description, or listing keywords
☐ Unauthorized use of logo or design mark in product images
☐ Use of trade dress (packaging, configuration, look and feel)
☐ False claims of authorized dealer or official seller status
☐ Sale of counterfeit goods bearing the mark
☐ Sale of materially different gray market goods
☐ Use of mark in backend search terms or meta tags
☐ Other: [________________________________]
Arkansas Consumer Impact
☐ Infringing goods have been shipped to Arkansas addresses
☐ Arkansas consumers have purchased infringing goods from the listed seller
☐ Our Client has received complaints or inquiries from Arkansas consumers regarding the infringing goods
☐ The infringing listings target Arkansas consumers through location-based advertising or shipping options
PART IV: LEGAL VIOLATIONS — FEDERAL AND ARKANSAS STATE CLAIMS
A. Federal Claims Under the Lanham Act
1. Trademark Infringement — 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)
Your unauthorized use of the [________________________________] mark on the [________________________________] marketplace constitutes infringement. The Eighth Circuit applies a multi-factor likelihood of confusion test derived from SquirtCo v. Seven-Up Co., 628 F.2d 1086 (8th Cir. 1980):
☐ Strength of the mark
☐ Similarity of the marks
☐ Competitive proximity of the products
☐ Intent of the alleged infringer to pass off goods as those of the trademark owner
☐ Evidence of actual confusion
☐ Degree of care expected of potential purchasers
2. False Designation of Origin — 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)
Your listings falsely designate or misrepresent the origin, sponsorship, or approval of your goods.
3. Counterfeiting — 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) / 18 U.S.C. § 2320 (if applicable)
☐ The goods are counterfeit, entitling Our Client to statutory damages and potential criminal referral.
B. Arkansas State Claims
4. Arkansas Trademark Infringement — Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-113
Your use of a reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of Our Client's mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or advertising of goods where such use is likely to cause confusion constitutes infringement under the Arkansas Trademark Act. Under Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-214, the court may:
- Issue an injunction
- Award all profits derived from the infringement
- Award damages
- Award treble damages for use of a counterfeit mark
- Order destruction of infringing goods
- Award reasonable attorneys' fees
5. Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices — Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-107
Your activities constitute deceptive trade practices under the Arkansas DTPA, including:
- § 4-88-107(a)(1): False representation as to source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods
- § 4-88-107(a)(2): False representation as to the source of goods
- § 4-88-107(a)(4): False representations as to affiliation, connection, or association
- § 4-88-107(a)(10): Unconscionable, false, or deceptive act or practice in business or commerce
Damages under DTPA: Under Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-113, the court may award actual damages, reasonable attorneys' fees, and an additional penalty of up to 10 times actual damages.
6. Arkansas Criminal Counterfeiting — Ark. Code Ann. § 5-37-213 (if applicable)
☐ The sale of counterfeit goods constitutes a criminal offense under Arkansas law.
PART V: MARKETPLACE-SPECIFIC REPORTING PROCEDURES
A. Amazon Brand Registry
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Program | Amazon Brand Registry — Report a Violation |
| URL | https://brandregistry.amazon.com |
| ASIN-Level Reporting | Yes |
| Additional Tools | Project Zero, Transparency, Counterfeit Crimes Unit |
B. eBay VeRO Program
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Program | eBay VeRO (Verified Rights Owner) |
| Report Method | Notice of Claimed Infringement (NOCI) |
| Submission | Online portal, email ([email protected]), or fax (801) 757-9521 |
| Typical Response | 24-48 hours |
C. Other Marketplace Platforms
| Platform | Reporting Method |
|---|---|
| Walmart | https://www.walmart.com/ip/report |
| Etsy | https://www.etsy.com/legal/ip |
| Facebook Marketplace | https://www.facebook.com/help/intellectual_property |
| Alibaba / AliExpress | https://ipp.alibabagroup.com |
| TikTok Shop | IP Infringement Report via seller portal |
Arkansas Practice Tip: Arkansas is home to Walmart's headquarters in Bentonville. If the infringement occurs on Walmart.com, Arkansas counsel may have particular advantages in working with Walmart's intellectual property enforcement team. Additionally, several major fulfillment centers are located in Arkansas, which may be relevant to the supply chain for infringing goods.
PART VI: DEMANDS
A. Immediate Actions (Within 24 Hours)
- Remove all infringing listings from the [________________________________] marketplace and all other online platforms.
- Cease all use of the [________________________________] mark or any confusingly similar mark.
- Remove all infringing content including images, descriptions, keywords, and meta tags.
B. Written Compliance (Within [____] Calendar Days)
- Written confirmation of full compliance sent to undersigned counsel.
- Full accounting including:
- Total units sold and gross revenue
- Current inventory count
- Supplier names, addresses, and contact information
- All marketplace accounts operated by you or affiliated entities
- Sales records for shipments to Arkansas addresses - Surrender or destroy all infringing inventory with documented proof.
C. Ongoing Obligations
- Permanent cessation of all use of Our Client's mark.
- Preserve all records relating to purchase, sale, and distribution of infringing goods.
D. Compliance Deadline
All demands must be satisfied no later than [__/__/____].
PART VII: LITIGATION WARNING AND REMEDIES
A. Federal Court — Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas
If you fail to comply, Our Client is prepared to file suit in the United States District Court for the ☐ Eastern District of Arkansas (Little Rock) or ☐ Western District of Arkansas (Fort Smith, Fayetteville, Texarkana, Hot Springs, Harrison, El Dorado), seeking:
- Temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction under 15 U.S.C. § 1116
- Permanent injunction
- Defendant's profits under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a)
- Actual damages (up to treble) under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a)
- Statutory damages of $1,000 to $2,000,000 per counterfeit mark per type of goods under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)
- Attorneys' fees and costs in exceptional cases
- Destruction of infringing articles under 15 U.S.C. § 1118
B. Arkansas State Court — Circuit Court
Our Client may also pursue claims in Arkansas Circuit Court seeking:
- Injunctive relief under Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-214
- Profits and damages under Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-214
- Treble damages for counterfeiting under Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-214
- Destruction of infringing goods under Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-214
- Actual damages plus up to 10 times actual damages under Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-113 (DTPA)
- Reasonable attorneys' fees under Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-113
C. Criminal Referral
☐ If counterfeit goods are involved, Our Client may refer this matter to:
- U.S. Attorney for the Eastern or Western District of Arkansas
- Arkansas Attorney General, Consumer Protection Division
- Local prosecuting attorneys for criminal counterfeiting charges under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-37-213
D. Attorney General Enforcement
The Arkansas Attorney General may seek civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation under Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-104 for deceptive trade practices. Our Client may refer this matter to the AG's Consumer Protection Division at:
Arkansas Attorney General
Consumer Protection Division
323 Center Street, Suite 200
Little Rock, AR 72201
PART VIII: EVIDENCE PRESERVATION CHECKLIST
Attorney Preparation Checklist:
☐ Verified USPTO TSDR records for all asserted registrations
☐ Arkansas Secretary of State trademark records (if applicable)
☐ Screenshots of all infringing listings with timestamps
☐ Test purchase(s) with order confirmations
☐ Photographs comparing authentic vs. test-purchased goods
☐ Chain of custody documentation
☐ Evidence of Arkansas consumer sales/impact
☐ Marketing expenditure records
☐ Evidence of actual confusion
☐ Prior enforcement action records
☐ Marketplace platform correspondence
Litigation Hold:
☐ Issue litigation hold notice to client
☐ Preserve all electronic evidence including metadata
☐ Save marketplace platform communications
☐ Document all marketplace IP report filings
PART IX: ARKANSAS-SPECIFIC PRACTICE NOTES
A. Jurisdiction and Venue — Eighth Circuit
Arkansas is in the Eighth Circuit. Federal trademark cases in Arkansas apply the Eighth Circuit's SquirtCo likelihood of confusion factors. Arkansas has two federal judicial districts:
- Eastern District of Arkansas (Little Rock Division, Jonesboro Division, Batesville Division, Helena Division, Pine Bluff Division)
- Western District of Arkansas (Fort Smith Division, Fayetteville Division, Texarkana Division, Hot Springs Division, Harrison Division, El Dorado Division)
Venue is proper where the defendant resides, where infringement occurred, or where the defendant may be found. For online marketplace infringement, venue may be proper in any district where infringing goods were sold or offered to consumers.
B. Arkansas DTPA — 10x Damages Multiplier
The Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act provides one of the most significant damages multipliers in the nation. Under Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-113, the court has discretion to award an additional penalty of up to 10 times actual damages. This is in addition to actual damages and attorneys' fees. Key considerations:
- The multiplier is discretionary with the court
- The violation must be willful to support the maximum penalty
- Arkansas courts consider the egregiousness of the conduct, the defendant's financial resources, and the need for deterrence
- For online marketplace infringement cases, the systematic nature of the infringing activity and evidence of bad faith (e.g., continued infringement after notice) support higher multipliers
Practice Tip: The potential for 10x damages under the Arkansas DTPA makes Arkansas an attractive forum for trademark enforcement against online marketplace sellers who target Arkansas consumers. Include specific evidence of Arkansas sales and consumer harm to maximize this claim.
C. Walmart Headquarters Connection
Walmart's corporate headquarters is located in Bentonville, Arkansas (Western District). For infringement occurring on Walmart.com:
- Arkansas counsel may have advantages in communicating with Walmart's IP enforcement team
- Walmart's Brand Portal facilitates direct reporting of trademark infringement
- Consider filing in the Western District of Arkansas if the infringing activity occurs on Walmart.com and the defendant has contacts with Arkansas
D. Arkansas Secretary of State — Trademark Registration
Arkansas state trademark registrations are filed with:
Arkansas Secretary of State
Trademarks Division
State Capitol, Suite 256
500 Woodlane Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
State registration provides constructive notice of the registrant's claim of ownership in Arkansas and serves as prima facie evidence of the validity of the registration and the registrant's exclusive right to use the mark in Arkansas.
E. Pre-Suit Notice Requirements
Arkansas does not require a formal pre-suit demand letter for trademark infringement claims. However, sending this cease and desist letter:
- Establishes the defendant's knowledge and bad faith for purposes of willfulness
- Supports a finding of "exceptional case" for attorneys' fees under the Lanham Act
- Provides the factual basis for enhanced damages under the Arkansas DTPA
- May trigger the marketplace platform's duty to act under contributory infringement theory
SIGNATURE AND DELIVERY
This letter is written without prejudice to any and all rights and remedies available to Our Client under federal and Arkansas state law, all of which are expressly reserved.
Respectfully but firmly,
[________________________________]
Attorney for [________________________________]
___________________________________________
Signature
[________________________________]
Name (Printed)
Arkansas Bar No.: [________________________________]
[________________________________]
Firm Name
[________________________________]
Address
[________________________________]
Telephone / Email
Date: [__/__/____]
ENCLOSURES AND EXHIBITS
☐ Exhibit A: Screenshots of Infringing Listings
☐ Exhibit B: Federal Trademark Registration Certificate(s)
☐ Exhibit C: Arkansas State Trademark Registration (if applicable)
☐ Exhibit D: TSDR Printout(s)
☐ Exhibit E: Comparison of Authentic vs. Infringing Goods
☐ Exhibit F: Test Purchase Documentation
☐ Exhibit G: Evidence of Arkansas Consumer Sales/Impact
☐ Exhibit H: Marketplace Seller Profile Screenshots
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
| Method | Details |
|---|---|
| Certified Mail | Tracking No.: [________________________________] |
| Sent to: [________________________________] on [__/__/____] | |
| Marketplace Message | Sent via: [________________________________] on [__/__/____] |
| Copy to Marketplace IP Dept. | Sent to: [________________________________] on [__/__/____] |
SOURCES AND REFERENCES
- Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1141n
- Arkansas Trademark Act, Ark. Code Ann. § 4-71-101 et seq.
- Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Ark. Code Ann. § 4-88-101 et seq.
- Ark. Code Ann. § 5-37-213 (Criminal Counterfeiting)
- Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., 600 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010)
- SquirtCo v. Seven-Up Co., 628 F.2d 1086 (8th Cir. 1980)
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc., 456 U.S. 844 (1982)
- Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 568 U.S. 519 (2013)
- Arkansas Secretary of State, Trademarks: https://www.sos.arkansas.gov
- Arkansas Attorney General, Consumer Protection: https://arkansasag.gov/consumer-protection
- Amazon Brand Registry: https://brandregistry.amazon.com
- eBay VeRO Program: https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/listing-policies/selling-policies/intellectual-property-vero-program
About This Template
Intellectual property law protects inventions, brand names, creative works, and trade secrets. Filings with federal IP offices have strict formal requirements, and demand letters or licensing agreements have to identify the exact rights being claimed. Weak IP paperwork makes it harder to enforce your rights against copycats, harder to sell or license your IP, and easier for someone else to claim it first.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: May 2026
Get your Trademark Cease and Desist - Online Marketplace (Arkansas), done and ready to use
Fill it in for your situation, adjust it for your state, and download the finished Word and PDF. Let the AI do it in about 5 minutes, or finish it yourself in the editor. Drafting this from scratch takes hours. Finish yours in about 5 minutes for $49, one time.