TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT VIOLATION DEMAND LETTER
STATE OF IDAHO
SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
AND FIRST-CLASS MAIL
[DATE]
[DEFENDANT COMPANY NAME]
ATTN: Legal Department / Registered Agent
[DEFENDANT ADDRESS]
[CITY, STATE ZIP]
Re: TCPA Violation Demand - Unauthorized Telephone Communications
Consumer: [CONSUMER FULL NAME]
Telephone Number(s) Affected: [PHONE NUMBER(S)]
Approximate Number of Violations: [NUMBER]
Dear Sir or Madam:
This law firm represents [CONSUMER FULL NAME] ("Consumer" or "Client") in connection with your company's violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. Section 227, its implementing regulations at 47 C.F.R. Section 64.1200, and applicable Idaho state law. Your company has placed unauthorized telephone calls and/or sent unauthorized text messages to our Client, entitling our Client to substantial statutory damages.
Please direct all future communications regarding this matter to our office and immediately cease all telephone communications with our Client.
I. IDAHO-SPECIFIC LEGAL FRAMEWORK
A. Federal TCPA Claims
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act provides a private right of action with statutory damages of $500 per violation, increased to $1,500 for willful or knowing violations. 47 U.S.C. Section 227(b)(3). The statute of limitations for TCPA claims is four (4) years under 28 U.S.C. Section 1658(a).
B. Idaho Consumer Protection Act
In addition to federal TCPA claims, our Client may pursue claims under the Idaho Consumer Protection Act ("ICPA"), Idaho Code Section 48-601 et seq.
The ICPA prohibits unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce. Idaho Code Section 48-603. Unwanted commercial telemarketing calls and text messages may constitute unfair or deceptive practices under Idaho law.
Private Right of Action: Idaho Code Section 48-608 provides consumers a private right of action for violations of the ICPA.
Remedies Available:
- Actual damages. Idaho Code Section 48-608(1)
- Treble damages for willful violations. Idaho Code Section 48-608(1)
- Reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Idaho Code Section 48-608(5)
- Injunctive relief. Idaho Code Section 48-608(1)
Statute of Limitations: Two (2) years. Idaho Code Section 48-619.
C. Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act
Idaho has enacted the Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act, Idaho Code Section 48-1001 et seq., which regulates telemarketing activities within the state.
Key Provisions:
- Telemarketers must register with the Idaho Attorney General. Idaho Code Section 48-1003
- Establishes requirements for telephone solicitation conduct. Idaho Code Section 48-1004
- Prohibits certain deceptive practices in telephone solicitation. Idaho Code Section 48-1004
- Violations constitute unfair and deceptive trade practices under the ICPA. Idaho Code Section 48-1006
D. Idaho Do-Not-Call Provisions
Idaho participates in the National Do-Not-Call Registry. The Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act requires telemarketers to comply with consumer requests to not be called.
Idaho Telephone Solicitation Requirements:
- Calls must be made between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. local time
- Caller must identify themselves and the company represented
- Caller must honor do-not-call requests
- Telemarketers must be registered with the Idaho Attorney General
II. SUMMARY OF VIOLATIONS
Our Client's claims are based on the following categories of violations:
Autodialed and/or Prerecorded Calls/Texts to Cell Phone (47 U.S.C. Section 227(b)(1)(A)):
[ ] Calls made using an automatic telephone dialing system ("ATDS") without prior express consent
[ ] Calls using an artificial or prerecorded voice without prior express consent
[ ] Text messages sent using an ATDS without prior express consent
[ ] Calls/texts made after consent was revoked
[ ] Calls/texts to a reassigned number without proper procedures
Telemarketing Calls (47 U.S.C. Section 227(c); 47 C.F.R. Section 64.1200):
[ ] Telemarketing calls to number on National Do-Not-Call Registry
[ ] Telemarketing calls to number on company-specific do-not-call list
[ ] Failure to maintain internal do-not-call list
[ ] Calls outside permitted hours (before 8:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m. local time)
[ ] Failure to provide required caller identification information
[ ] Failure to honor opt-out requests within 30 days
Prerecorded Telemarketing Calls (47 U.S.C. Section 227(b)(1)(B)):
[ ] Prerecorded telemarketing calls to residential line without prior express written consent
[ ] Prerecorded calls that fail to provide opt-out mechanism at beginning of message
[ ] Prerecorded calls that fail to provide toll-free opt-out number
Idaho CPA/Telephone Solicitation Act Violations:
[ ] Unfair or deceptive trade practices through unwanted commercial solicitations
[ ] Misrepresentations in telemarketing communications
[ ] Violations of Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act registration and conduct requirements
[ ] Failure to honor consumer do-not-call requests
III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Background Information
Consumer Information:
- Name: [CONSUMER FULL NAME]
- Telephone Number(s): [LIST ALL AFFECTED NUMBERS]
- Type of Number: [ ] Cellular [ ] Residential Landline [ ] Business [ ] VoIP
- Number Registration: [ ] National DNC Registry (Date: [DATE]) [ ] Company-specific DNC request (Date: [DATE])
- Idaho Resident: Yes
Defendant Information:
- Company Name: [DEFENDANT NAME]
- Type of Business: [DESCRIPTION]
- Relationship to Consumer: [ ] No prior relationship [ ] Former customer [ ] Inquiry only [ ] Other: [DESCRIBE]
B. Consent Status
Our Client [SELECT ONE]:
[ ] Never provided any form of consent to receive calls or texts from your company
[ ] Never provided prior express written consent for telemarketing calls or texts
[ ] Provided limited consent that did not extend to the type of calls/texts received. Specifically: [DESCRIBE LIMITATION]
[ ] Revoked any prior consent on [DATE] by [DESCRIBE METHOD - verbal request, written request, opt-out text, etc.]
[ ] The telephone number was reassigned to our Client on approximately [DATE], and our Client never provided consent
C. Call/Text Log
The following is a log of unauthorized communications our Client received from your company:
| Date | Time | Type | Caller ID | Duration/Content | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [DATE] | [TIME] | [ ] Call [ ] Text [ ] Voicemail | [NUMBER DISPLAYED] | [DESCRIPTION] | [ ] Phone records [ ] Screenshot [ ] Recording [ ] Voicemail saved |
| [DATE] | [TIME] | [ ] Call [ ] Text [ ] Voicemail | [NUMBER DISPLAYED] | [DESCRIPTION] | [ ] Phone records [ ] Screenshot [ ] Recording [ ] Voicemail saved |
| [DATE] | [TIME] | [ ] Call [ ] Text [ ] Voicemail | [NUMBER DISPLAYED] | [DESCRIPTION] | [ ] Phone records [ ] Screenshot [ ] Recording [ ] Voicemail saved |
[CONTINUE AS NEEDED - OR ATTACH SEPARATE LOG]
Total Documented Violations: [NUMBER]
Estimated Additional Violations: [NUMBER]
D. Evidence of Autodialer Use
The following characteristics indicate that your company used an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) or prerecorded messages:
[ ] Prerecorded or artificial voice message
[ ] Pause before connection to live agent ("dead air")
[ ] Identical or substantially similar message content across multiple calls
[ ] Generic messaging not specific to our Client
[ ] High call volume inconsistent with manual dialing
[ ] Calls/texts received at unusual or automated intervals
[ ] Simultaneous calls to multiple lines
[ ] Company marketing materials or website referencing automated calling technology
[ ] Other: [DESCRIBE]
IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS
A. Automatic Telephone Dialing System (ATDS) Calls - 47 U.S.C. Section 227(b)(1)(A)
The TCPA prohibits any person from making any call using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice to any telephone number assigned to a cellular telephone service without the prior express consent of the called party. 47 U.S.C. Section 227(b)(1)(A)(iii).
Following the Supreme Court's decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 141 S. Ct. 1163 (2021), an ATDS is defined as equipment that uses a random or sequential number generator either to store or produce numbers to be called.
B. Prior Express Consent Requirement
For non-telemarketing autodialed or prerecorded calls, the caller must obtain "prior express consent." 47 C.F.R. Section 64.1200(a)(1). For telemarketing autodialed or prerecorded calls, the caller must obtain "prior express written consent," which must:
- Be in writing (including electronic agreements)
- Bear the signature of the person called
- Clearly authorize the caller to deliver telemarketing messages using an ATDS or prerecorded voice
- Include the telephone number to which calls may be made
- Not be required as a condition of purchase
47 C.F.R. Section 64.1200(f)(9).
Your company lacks valid consent because [EXPLAIN WHY].
C. National Do-Not-Call Registry Violations - 47 U.S.C. Section 227(c)
Our Client's number has been registered on the National Do-Not-Call Registry since [DATE]. Your company had constructive notice of this registration and was prohibited from making telemarketing calls to our Client.
D. Idaho Consumer Protection Act Analysis
Under the Idaho Consumer Protection Act, your conduct constitutes an unfair or deceptive practice because [DESCRIBE HOW CONDUCT VIOLATES ICPA]. The ICPA provides for actual damages, treble damages for willful violations, and attorney's fees.
E. Willful and Knowing Violations
The TCPA provides for treble damages ($1,500 per violation) where the defendant "willfully or knowingly" violated the statute. 47 U.S.C. Section 227(b)(3)(C).
Your violations were willful and knowing because:
[ ] You continued calling after our Client explicitly revoked consent
[ ] You continued calling after our Client requested placement on your do-not-call list
[ ] You have been the subject of prior TCPA complaints, lawsuits, or regulatory actions
[ ] You continued calling a number registered on the National DNC Registry
[ ] Other evidence of willfulness: [DESCRIBE]
V. DAMAGES CALCULATION
A. Federal TCPA Statutory Damages Under 47 U.S.C. Section 227(b)(3)
| Category | Number of Violations | Standard Damages ($500) | Treble Damages ($1,500) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autodialed calls to cell phone | [NUMBER] | $[AMOUNT] | $[AMOUNT] |
| Prerecorded calls to cell phone | [NUMBER] | $[AMOUNT] | $[AMOUNT] |
| Texts sent via ATDS | [NUMBER] | $[AMOUNT] | $[AMOUNT] |
| DNC Registry violations | [NUMBER] | $[AMOUNT] | $[AMOUNT] |
| Calls after consent revocation | [NUMBER] | $[AMOUNT] | $[AMOUNT] |
| TOTAL FEDERAL | [NUMBER] | $[AMOUNT] | $[AMOUNT] |
B. Idaho CPA Damages
| Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| Actual Damages | $[AMOUNT] |
| Treble Damages (willful violation) | $[AMOUNT] |
| Attorney's Fees | $[AMOUNT] |
| TOTAL STATE | $[AMOUNT] |
C. Combined Damages Summary
| Source | Amount |
|---|---|
| Federal TCPA Damages | $[AMOUNT] |
| Idaho CPA Damages | $[AMOUNT] |
| Attorney's Fees | $[AMOUNT] |
| TOTAL DAMAGES | $[AMOUNT] |
VI. PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE
You are hereby directed to preserve all documents, data, and electronically stored information related to our Client and your calling practices, including but not limited to:
- All call records, including metadata, to and from our Client's telephone number(s)
- All text message records and content
- Consent records, including any purported written consent
- Do-not-call lists and opt-out records
- Calling platform data, including dialer logs and campaign records
- Vendor agreements and records from any third-party calling services
- Training materials for calling personnel
- Policies and procedures for TCPA compliance
- Records of any prior TCPA complaints, lawsuits, or regulatory inquiries
Failure to preserve this evidence may result in sanctions, adverse inference instructions, and separate claims for spoliation under Idaho law.
VII. DEMAND FOR SETTLEMENT
To resolve this matter without the time and expense of litigation, we demand the following:
A. Monetary Compensation
Payment of $[SETTLEMENT DEMAND] within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, representing:
- Statutory/treble damages for documented violations: $[AMOUNT]
- Idaho CPA damages: $[AMOUNT]
- Attorney's fees incurred to date: $[AMOUNT]
B. Injunctive Relief
-
Permanent removal of our Client's telephone number(s) from all calling lists, databases, and marketing campaigns
-
Placement of our Client on your company's internal do-not-call list
-
Written confirmation that the above actions have been taken
VIII. RESPONSE REQUIRED
Please respond to this demand in writing within thirty (30) days. Your response should include:
- The identity of your calling platform or service provider
- The source of our Client's telephone number
- Any consent records you believe you possess
- Your settlement offer
If we do not receive a satisfactory response within the stated timeframe, we are authorized to file suit in the appropriate Idaho state court or the United States District Court for the District of Idaho without further notice.
IX. CONCLUSION
Your company's repeated violations of the TCPA and Idaho law have caused our Client significant annoyance, inconvenience, and invasion of privacy. We strongly encourage you to resolve this matter promptly.
This letter is written without prejudice to any rights or remedies of our Client, all of which are expressly reserved.
Respectfully submitted,
[LAW FIRM NAME]
By: _________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
Idaho State Bar No. [NUMBER]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY, IDAHO ZIP]
[TELEPHONE]
[EMAIL]
Attorneys for [CONSUMER FULL NAME]
ENCLOSURES:
[ ] Call/text log with dates and times
[ ] Phone records/billing statements
[ ] Screenshots of text messages
[ ] Voicemail recordings (on USB drive)
[ ] Written revocation of consent
[ ] DNC Registry confirmation
[ ] Authorization to represent
cc: [CONSUMER NAME]
[CLIENT FILE]
IDAHO-SPECIFIC PRACTICE NOTES
[ ] Idaho Telephone Solicitation Act: Violations of Idaho Code Section 48-1001 et seq. constitute per se violations of the Idaho Consumer Protection Act.
[ ] Telemarketer Registration: Verify whether defendant is registered with the Idaho Attorney General as required by Idaho Code Section 48-1003.
[ ] Idaho CPA: Provides for treble damages for willful violations and attorney's fees. Idaho Code Section 48-608.
[ ] Pre-Suit Notice: Consider whether pre-suit demand notice may be required or advisable under Idaho law.
[ ] Attorney's Fees: Available under Idaho CPA; not expressly provided under federal TCPA.
[ ] Venue: Actions may be filed in Idaho state court or in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho.
[ ] Class Actions: TCPA claims may be brought as class actions. Consider whether class treatment is appropriate.
[ ] Small Claims: For smaller individual claims, consider Idaho Small Claims Court (up to $5,000).
[ ] AG Complaint: Consider filing a complaint with the Idaho Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division.
This template is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed Idaho attorney before use.