STATE OF WISCONSIN

CIRCUIT COURT – [COUNTY] COUNTY

CRIMINAL DIVISION

State of Wisconsin,
Plaintiff,

v. Case No. [20XX-CF-____]

[DEFENDANT FULL LEGAL NAME],
Defendant.

MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE AND REQUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

[Wis. Stat. § 971.31(10)]

[// GUIDANCE: This template is intended for use in Wisconsin state criminal proceedings. Replace all bracketed text with matter-specific information, delete inapplicable sections, and add factual allegations and argument tailored to the case.]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 2
2. Procedural Posture ................................................................................................. 2
3. Statement of Facts ................................................................................................. 3
4. Applicable Law ....................................................................................................... 4
   4.1 Constitutional Framework ................................................................................. 4
   4.2 Wisconsin Statutory Framework ....................................................................... 4
   4.3 Suppression Standard & Burdens .................................................................... 5
   4.4 Good-Faith Exception ....................................................................................... 5
5. Argument ................................................................................................................ 6
   5.1 Defective Warrant / Warrantless Search ......................................................... 6
   5.2 No Applicable Exception to the Warrant Requirement .................................... 7
   5.3 Evidence Must Be Suppressed ....................................................................... 8
6. Request for Evidentiary Hearing .......................................................................... 8
7. Relief Requested .................................................................................................... 9
8. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 9
9. Certification of Compliance ................................................................................. 10
10. Proposed Order (attached) ................................................................................ 11
11. Certificate of Service .......................................................................................... 12

1. Introduction

Defendant [DEFENDANT NAME] (“Defendant”) respectfully moves this Court, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 971.31(10), the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and Article I, § 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution, to suppress all physical evidence, statements, observations, and fruits thereof obtained as a result of the unlawful [search/seizure] conducted on [DATE] at [LOCATION].

2. Procedural Posture

1. On [DATE], the State filed a Criminal Complaint charging Defendant with [LIST CHARGES] arising from the incident of [DATE].
2. Defendant was arraigned on [DATE] and entered pleas of not guilty.
3. Discovery produced on [DATE] reveals that the evidence at issue was obtained through [briefly describe search/seizure].
4. This Motion is timely under Wis. Stat. § 971.31(5)(a) and the Court’s [DATE] scheduling order.

[// GUIDANCE: Modify the timeline and citations to any scheduling orders.]

3. Statement of Facts

[Provide a concise, chronologically-ordered narrative of all facts relevant to the challenged search or seizure. Identify:
• law-enforcement agency and officers involved;
• time, date, and location;
• whether a warrant was issued (include warrant number, issuing court, and time signed);
• manner in which warrant was executed or search conducted;
• items seized;
• Defendant’s contemporaneous statements or conduct;
• any subsequent searches dependent on the first search.]

4. Applicable Law

4.1 Constitutional Framework

1. The Fourth Amendment guarantees the right of the people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV.
2. Article I, § 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution affords co-extensive protections.

4.2 Wisconsin Statutory Framework

1. Warrants, execution of warrants, and related procedures are governed by Wis. Stat. §§ 968.10–968.22.
2. Motions to suppress must be brought under Wis. Stat. § 971.31(10).
3. The exclusionary rule bars the admission of evidence obtained in violation of constitutional or statutory search-and-seizure provisions.

4.3 Suppression Standard & Burdens

1. The State bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the search or seizure was lawful.
2. Once the Defendant makes a prima facie showing of illegality, the burden shifts to the State to justify the intrusion under a recognized exception.

4.4 Good-Faith Exception

1. Wisconsin recognizes a “good-faith” exception to the exclusionary rule where officers act in objectively reasonable reliance on a facially valid warrant or binding precedent.
2. The State bears the burden of establishing applicability of the exception; it does not apply where (a) the warrant is based on knowingly or recklessly false information, (b) the issuing court wholly abandons its neutral role, (c) the affidavit is so lacking in probable cause that belief in its existence is objectively unreasonable, or (d) the warrant is so facially deficient that officers cannot reasonably presume it to be valid.

[// GUIDANCE: Insert case-specific reasons why the good-faith exception fails, e.g., stale information, bare-bones affidavit, misstatements, etc.]

5. Argument

5.1 Defective Warrant / Warrantless Search

[Analyze why no valid warrant existed or why the warrant was deficient—probable cause, particularity, staleness, jurisdictional defect, absence of oath, etc.]

5.2 No Applicable Exception to the Warrant Requirement

[Address and negate each potential exception raised by the State: consent, exigent circumstances, search-incident-to-arrest, automobile exception, plain view, protective sweep, inventory search, community-caretaker, etc.]

5.3 Evidence Must Be Suppressed

1. Because the search violated Defendant’s constitutional and statutory rights, the fruits of that search are inadmissible.
2. Suppression must extend to all direct and derivative evidence, including but not limited to:
   a. [ITEM 1];
   b. [ITEM 2];
   c. [STATEMENTS];
   d. Any additional evidence discovered via subsequent searches dependent on the original illegality (fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine).

6. Request for Evidentiary Hearing

Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 971.31(3), Defendant requests an evidentiary (Franks/McMotions) hearing to (a) permit cross-examination of officers, (b) test the sufficiency and veracity of the affidavit, and (c) develop the factual record required for adjudication of this Motion.

[// GUIDANCE: If challenging misstatements or omissions in an affidavit, include a Franks proffer and specify portions to be examined.]

7. Relief Requested

Defendant respectfully asks that the Court:
1. Conduct an evidentiary hearing;
2. Suppress all evidence obtained as a result of the unconstitutional [search/seizure] described herein;
3. Suppress all derivative evidence; and
4. Grant such further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

8. Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons, the Court should suppress the challenged evidence in its entirety.

9. Certification of Compliance

I certify that this Motion:
1. Complies with Wis. Stat. § 971.31 and any local rules;
2. Is not interposed for improper purpose; and
3. Is supported by existing law or a good-faith argument for extension, modification, or reversal of existing law.

DATED: [DATE]

Respectfully submitted,

[ATTORNEY NAME]
State Bar No. [XXXXXXX]
[LAW FIRM]
[ADDRESS]
[PHONE] | [EMAIL]
Counsel for Defendant

10. Proposed Order

[COURT CAPTION AS ABOVE]

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

The Court, having considered Defendant’s Motion, the evidence adduced, and the arguments of counsel, finds that the [search/seizure] of [DATE] violated Defendant’s rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Article I, § 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution, and Wis. Stat. §§ 968.10–968.22.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Motion is GRANTED.
2. All evidence identified in the Motion, and any fruits thereof, are SUPPRESSED.
3. [Optional] The State shall, within [##] days, file a statement indicating how it intends to proceed.

Dated: _____ , 20__.

Circuit Court Judge
[COUNTY] County, Wisconsin

11. Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on [DATE] a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion to Suppress Evidence and Proposed Order was served upon the [DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE] by [method of service, e.g., electronic filing system, hand delivery, or mail] in accordance with Wis. Stat. § 971.31(5)(b) and local rules.

[ATTORNEY NAME]

[// GUIDANCE:
• Verify local court rules for formatting, page limits, and hearing-request procedures.
• Attach any supporting exhibits (warrant, affidavit, police reports, transcripts) with an index.
• For electronically filed cases, ensure compliance with eFiling technical requirements.
• Consider simultaneously filing a brief in support if local practice favors a separate memorandum.]