State Criminal Motion to Suppress - South Dakota

South Dakota Criminal Law Updated October 23, 2026 Free Word and PDF

Motion to Suppress Evidence

STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
COUNTY OF [____________]
IN CIRCUIT COURT, [____________] JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

State of South Dakota, Plaintiff Case No. [____________]
v. MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
[DEFENDANT FULL NAME], Defendant

Defendant [NAME], through [COUNSEL NAME], moves under SDCL § 23A-8-3(4) and the Fourth Amendment to suppress the evidence identified below. This motion concerns the search, seizure, and, if selected, custodial questioning on [DATE] at [LOCATION]. Defendant requests a hearing and essential findings on contested facts under SDCL § 23A-8-8.

1. Evidence and requested relief

Evidence or statement When and where obtained Government act challenged Requested ruling
[ITEM / RECORD] [____________] [SEARCH OR SEIZURE] [____________]
[ITEM / RECORD] [____________] [SEARCH OR SEIZURE] [____________]
[EXACT STATEMENT] [____________] [CUSTODIAL QUESTIONING] [____________]

Defendant requests suppression only to the extent the Court finds the identified evidence was obtained in violation of the asserted constitutional rule and is subject to exclusion after considering any applicable exception or limitation. A Miranda warning claim in Section 4 seeks exclusion of the identified statements; it does not, by itself, seek exclusion of physical evidence derived from an unwarned statement.

2. Case and filing posture

  1. The State charged Defendant with [OFFENSE AND STATUTORY CITATION] by [COMPLAINT / INFORMATION / INDICTMENT] filed [DATE]. This action is pending in this circuit court. SDCL § 16-6-12 states the court's felony and concurrent misdemeanor jurisdiction.
  2. The State disclosed [REPORT / BODY CAMERA / RECORDING / PROPERTY INVENTORY] on [DATE]. It shows the acts described below.
  3. This motion is filed before trial and by the Court's [DATE] deadline. SDCL § 23A-8-3(4) requires suppression motions to be raised before trial; § 23A-8-4 permits the Court to set motion and hearing dates. If the deadline has passed, Defendant requests relief for cause shown under § 23A-8-9 and explains the cause: [____________].

3. Facts supporting the search or seizure claim

  1. On [DATE AND TIME], [OFFICER NAME AND AGENCY] [ENTERED / STOPPED / DETAINED / SEARCHED] [PERSON OR PLACE]. The relevant facts are [SPECIFIC FACTS, WITH RECORD CITATIONS].
  2. The State asserts [WARRANT / CONSENT / EXIGENCY / OTHER AUTHORITY]. Defendant contests it because [FACTUAL BASIS AND RECORD CITATIONS].
  3. The search or seizure produced [EVIDENCE]. The connection between the challenged act and each item is [____________].
  4. The disputed facts needing testimony are [____________]. Proposed witnesses and exhibits are [____________].

4. Legal grounds

A. Fourth Amendment search or seizure

The Fourth Amendment protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures and requires probable cause and particularity for warrants. U.S. Const. amend. IV. On the facts in Section 3, Defendant contends that [SPECIFY WARRANT DEFECT OR WHY THE ASSERTED WARRANT EXCEPTION FAILS]. The State's anticipated position is [____________]; Defendant's response is [____________]. Defendant requests exclusion of [SPECIFIC EVIDENCE] if the Court finds a violation and determines exclusion is warranted under the law applicable to that violation.

B. Custodial statements, if applicable

☐ Defendant was in custody because [SPECIFIC FACTS]. Officers questioned Defendant by [QUESTIONS OR CONDUCT] on [DATE] before giving the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). The exact unwarned statement(s) are [____________]. Defendant requests exclusion of those statement(s) from the prosecution's case, subject to the applicable law and any facts concerning warnings, waiver, and use of the statements.

☐ This ground is not asserted.

5. Hearing and order requested

Defendant asks the Court to:

  1. Set a hearing for [DATE OR "the Court's earliest available date"] under SDCL § 23A-8-4;
  2. Receive [WITNESS / EXHIBIT] and resolve the factual disputes in Sections 3 and 4;
  3. State essential factual findings on the record under SDCL § 23A-8-8;
  4. Suppress [PRECISE ITEMS OR STATEMENTS] if the Court finds the applicable grounds and no controlling exception permits their use; and
  5. Grant any further appropriate relief.

If newly discovered evidence warrants another suppression hearing after the scheduled hearing, Defendant may request that the Court exercise its authority under SDCL § 23A-8-5. This motion does not assume a further hearing is automatic.

Dated: [____________]

[COUNSEL NAME]
[SD BAR NUMBER]
[ADDRESS]
[PHONE / EMAIL]
Counsel for Defendant

Notice of hearing

The hearing is scheduled for [DATE AND TIME] at [COURTROOM / ADDRESS], before [JUDGE], or at a time later set by the Court. If no hearing date has been assigned, replace this paragraph after the Court schedules one.

Certificate of service

I certify that on [DATE], I served this motion on [PROSECUTOR NAME AND OFFICE] by [METHOD], at [ADDRESS OR APPROVED ELECTRONIC ADDRESS].

[SIGNATURE]
[COUNSEL NAME]

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)Choose a plan

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
state_criminal_motion_to_suppress_sd.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Draft it in the editor

The AI drafts each section from your answers and you review every word. Drafting from scratch takes hours; finish yours for $99 one time.

  • Built on this template
    Uses the South Dakota version and the statutes it cites.
  • Formatted like the template
    Captions, numbering and layout stay intact.
  • AI editing
    Rewrite any section from your own notes.
  • Export as PDF and Word
    Yours to review, sign, or file.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About this template

Last updated
October 23, 2026
Citations checked
October 23, 2026
Jurisdiction
South Dakota
Category
Criminal Law

Legal authority

  • SDCL § 23A-8-3(4)
  • SDCL § 23A-8-4
  • SDCL § 23A-8-5
  • SDCL § 23A-8-8
  • SDCL § 23A-8-9
  • SDCL § 16-6-12
  • U.S. Const. amend. IV
  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Criminal law paperwork covers every stage of a criminal case, from the first appearance and bail motion through pretrial motions, plea agreements, sentencing, and appeals. Deadlines in criminal cases are short and often unforgiving, and constitutional rights can be waived just by missing a filing. Using the right motion at the right time can mean the difference between evidence getting suppressed, charges getting reduced, or a case getting dismissed entirely.

Not legal advice

This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Checked against the law it cites

A reviewer verified this template's legal citations against the official source on October 23, 2026.

SDCL § 23A-8-3(4) (checked October 23, 2026): "The following must be raised prior to trial: (1) Defenses and objections based on defects in the institution of the prosecution; (2) Defenses and objections based upon prior conviction or acquittal; (3) Defenses and objections based on defects in the indictment or information (other than that it fails to show jurisdiction in the court or to charge an offense which objections shall be noticed by the court at any time during the pendency of the proceedings); (4) Motions to suppress evidence;"

SDCL § 23A-8-4 (checked October 23, 2026): "A court may at the time of an arraignment or as soon thereafter as practicable, set a time for the making of pretrial motions or requests and, if required, a later date of hearing."

SDCL § 23A-8-5 (checked October 23, 2026): "A court may set a subsequent hearing after the hearing set pursuant to § 23A-8-4 for the purpose of hearing motions to suppress newly discovered evidence."

SDCL § 23A-8-8 (checked October 23, 2026): "Where factual issues are involved in determining a motion, the court shall state its essential findings on the record."

Draft your State Criminal Motion to Suppress in the editor

Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.