Templates Criminal Law State Criminal Motion to Suppress
Ready to Edit
State Criminal Motion to Suppress - Free Editor

State of Nebraska, ) Case No. [CASE NO.]
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) DEFENDANT’S MOTION
) TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
[DEFENDANT NAME], )
)
Defendant. )
____________________________________ )

[DATE]

====================================================================
TABLE OF CONTENTS
====================================================================
I. Preliminary Statement..............................................2
II. Procedural Posture & Request for Hearing...........................2
III. Statement of Relevant Facts........................................3
IV. Grounds for Suppression............................................5
A. Unlawful Search & Seizure (Fourth Amendment /
Nebraska Constitution)..........................................5
B. Invalid/Warrantless Arrest......................................6
C. Miranda / Custodial Interrogation Issues........................7
D. Fruits-of-the-Poisonous-Tree Doctrine...........................8
E. Lack of Good-Faith Reliance.....................................9
V. Burden of Proof & Standard of Review..............................10
VI. Prayer for Relief.................................................11
VII. Reservation of Rights............................................12
VIII. Verification.....................................................12
IX. Certificate of Service...........................................13
Proposed Order (Exhibit A)..............................................14

====================================================================
I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
====================================================================
COMES NOW the Defendant, [DEFENDANT NAME] (“Defendant”), by and through
undersigned counsel, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court,
pursuant to U.S. Const. amend. IV, Neb. Const. art. I, § 7, and all
other applicable law, to suppress the physical, testimonial, and
derivative evidence described herein. In support thereof, Defendant
states as follows:

[// GUIDANCE: List every item of evidence you seek to suppress
separately (e.g., “all narcotics, photographs, statements, and digital
data seized on [DATE]”).]

====================================================================
II. PROCEDURAL POSTURE & REQUEST FOR HEARING
====================================================================
1. Defendant was charged by [Complaint/Information] filed on
[FILING DATE].

  1. Pursuant to [LOCAL RULE] and Neb. R. Crim. P. 6-[LOCAL RULE
    NUMBER], this Motion is timely filed within the period prescribed
    for pre-trial motions.

  2. Defendant respectfully requests an evidentiary hearing at which the
    State shall bear the burden of proving the lawfulness of the search,
    seizure, arrest, and interrogation beyond a mere showing of good
    faith.

[// GUIDANCE: Insert the specific court rule or scheduling order
deadline that governs filing of suppression motions in your judicial
district.]

====================================================================
III. STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS
====================================================================
4. On [DATE] at approximately [TIME], officers of the
[LAW-ENFORCEMENT AGENCY] entered [LOCATION] and conducted
[DESCRIPTION OF SEARCH/SEIZURE].

  1. The officers lacked a warrant at the time of entry.
    —OR—
    Officers obtained Warrant No. [WARRANT #] issued by [JUDGE] at
    [TIME], based on an affidavit by [AFFIANT] containing the assertions
    summarized below.

  2. [Provide concise chronology of events: detention, questioning,
    seizure of items, statements made, etc.]

  3. No Miranda warnings were provided until [TIME/LATER], after
    Defendant had already given statements and consent allegedly
    obtained by officers.

[// GUIDANCE: Lay out facts neutrally but with enough specificity to let
the court see exactly when constitutional protections attached.]

====================================================================
IV. GROUNDS FOR SUPPRESSION
====================================================================

A. Unlawful Search & Seizure

  1. The warrantless entry violated the Fourth Amendment and Neb.
    Const. art. I, § 7 because no recognized exception (e.g., consent,
    exigency, plain view) applied.

  2. Alternatively, if the State relies on the warrant dated [DATE], the
    affidavit lacked probable cause because:
    a. It relied on conclusory statements without factual nexus;
    b. Material information was omitted and/or false;
    c. The place to be searched and items to be seized were described
    with insufficient particularity.

B. Invalid/Warrantless Arrest

  1. Defendant’s arrest occurred absent probable cause where officers
    lacked articulable facts connecting Defendant to any crime.

C. Miranda / Custodial Interrogation Issues

  1. Any statements obtained before issuance of Miranda warnings must be
    suppressed. Post-warning statements constitute fruit of the initial
    illegality and were not the product of a knowing, intelligent, and
    voluntary waiver.

D. Fruits-of-the-Poisonous-Tree

  1. All evidence derived—directly or indirectly—from the unlawful
    search, seizure, or interrogation is tainted and inadmissible.

E. Lack of Good-Faith Reliance

  1. The State cannot invoke any good-faith exception because no
    objectively reasonable officer could believe the search or seizure
    was lawful under the circumstances described.

[// GUIDANCE: Insert any Nebraska-specific statutory rule on motions to
suppress here—e.g., Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-822 et seq.—after verifying
accuracy.]

====================================================================
V. BURDEN OF PROOF & STANDARD OF REVIEW
====================================================================
14. Once the defendant challenges the legality of a search or seizure,
the prosecution bears the burden of proving the challenged conduct
was constitutionally valid.

  1. Suppression is mandatory where the State fails to meet this burden;
    doubts must be resolved in favor of the constitutional preference
    for warrants.

====================================================================
VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
====================================================================
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully prays that this Court:

A. Conduct an evidentiary hearing on this Motion;
B. Suppress all physical evidence, statements, identifications, and
derivative evidence obtained on [DATE] or thereafter;
C. Order the State to refrain from any mention or introduction of such
evidence before the jury; and
D. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and
proper.

====================================================================
VII. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
====================================================================
16. Defendant reserves all rights to file additional motions, including
motions in limine, and to supplement or amend this Motion should new
facts or legal grounds arise.

====================================================================
VIII. VERIFICATION
====================================================================
I, [ATTORNEY NAME], counsel for Defendant, hereby certify that the
foregoing statements of fact are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge, information, and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry.

/s/ [ATTORNEY NAME]
[LAW FIRM]
[ADDRESS]
[PHONE]
[EMAIL]

====================================================================
IX. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
====================================================================
I hereby certify that on the ___ day of __________, 20__, I served a
true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion to Suppress Evidence upon
the [County Attorney/Prosecuting Attorney] by:

☐ Hand Delivery
☐ U.S. Mail, postage prepaid
☐ E-Filing System

/s/ [ATTORNEY NAME]

====================================================================
EXHIBIT A – PROPOSED ORDER
====================================================================
(Draft only; court may modify.)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [COUNTY] COUNTY, NEBRASKA
State of Nebraska v. [DEFENDANT NAME]
Case No. [CASE NO.]

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion, the evidence adduced, and
arguments of counsel, the Court finds that the search, seizure, and/or
interrogation at issue violated Defendant’s constitutional rights and
that no good-faith exception applies. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that all evidence listed in ¶ [NUMBER] of Defendant’s
Motion, and any fruits thereof, are hereby SUPPRESSED and shall not be
introduced at trial or any other proceeding.

SO ORDERED this ___ day of __________, 20__.

_________________________________
Judge of the District Court
[COUNTY] County, Nebraska

====================================================================
[END OF DOCUMENT – PLACEHOLDER]
====================================================================

[// GUIDANCE:
1. Verify local procedural rules for format, timing, and page limits.
2. Confirm the accuracy of any Nebraska statutory citations before
filing.
3. Attach supporting exhibits (warrant, affidavit, transcripts,
body-camera footage logs) as separate labeled exhibits.
4. Consider filing a separate brief if complex constitutional issues
require expanded argument.
5. Adapt Verification section if client—not counsel—must verify facts
in your jurisdiction.
]

AI Legal Assistant

Download this template free, or draft it 10x faster with Ezel's AI-powered legal workspace.

Do more with Ezel

This free template is just the beginning. See how Ezel helps legal teams draft, research, and collaborate faster.

AI Document Editor

AI that drafts while you watch

Tell the AI what you need and watch your document transform in real-time. No more copy-pasting between tools or manually formatting changes.

  • Natural language commands: "Add a force majeure clause"
  • Context-aware suggestions based on document type
  • Real-time streaming shows edits as they happen
  • Milestone tracking and version comparison
Learn more about the Editor
AI Chat for legal research
AI Chat Workspace

Research and draft in one conversation

Ask questions, attach documents, and get answers grounded in case law. Link chats to matters so the AI remembers your context.

  • Pull statutes, case law, and secondary sources
  • Attach and analyze contracts mid-conversation
  • Link chats to matters for automatic context
  • Your data never trains AI models
Learn more about AI Chat
Case law search interface
Case Law Search

Search like you think

Describe your legal question in plain English. Filter by jurisdiction, date, and court level. Read full opinions without leaving Ezel.

  • All 50 states plus federal courts
  • Natural language queries - no boolean syntax
  • Citation analysis and network exploration
  • Copy quotes with automatic citation generation
Learn more about Case Law Search

Ready to transform your legal workflow?

Join legal teams using Ezel to draft documents, research case law, and organize matters - all in one workspace.