COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY

[_] CIRCUIT COURT
[___] DIVISION

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Plaintiff

v. CASE NO. [__]

[DEFENDANT FULL LEGAL NAME]
Defendant

MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

(Pursuant to U.S. Const. amend. IV; Ky. Const. § 10; and Ky. R. Crim. P. 8.27, 9.78)

[// GUIDANCE: File and notice this motion in strict compliance with Ky. R. Crim. P. 8.27 (timing) and applicable local rules. Serve the Commonwealth electronically or by hand pursuant to RCr 12.04. Tailor factual and legal sections to the precise search/seizure statements you are challenging.]

I. INTRODUCTION

Comes now the Defendant, [DEFENDANT NAME] (“Defendant”), by and through undersigned counsel, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court for an Order suppressing and excluding from evidence at trial (a) tangible items seized on or about [DATE] during the warrantless search of [LOCATION], (b) any and all statements allegedly made by Defendant subsequent to the unlawful detention and interrogation on [DATE], and (c) all derivative evidence flowing therefrom as the “fruit of the poisonous tree.” This Motion is brought pursuant to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Section 10 of the Kentucky Constitution, and Kentucky Rules of Criminal Procedure 8.27 and 9.78.

II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

1. Arrest & Charges. Defendant was arrested on [DATE] and is presently charged under Indictment No. [__] with [LIST CHARGES].
2. Discovery. On [DATE], the Commonwealth produced discovery indicating that the challenged evidence will be introduced at trial.
3. Timeliness. This Motion is timely because it is filed within the period prescribed by RCr 8.27(1) and the Court’s scheduling Order dated [DATE].

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS

[// GUIDANCE: Provide a concise, record-supported chronology. Reference discovery bates numbers, body-cam timestamps, etc.]

1. Initial Encounter. At approximately [TIME] on [DATE], officers with the [AGENCY] approached Defendant at [LOCATION] without a warrant.
2. Search & Seizure. Officers conducted a search of [VEHICLE/RESIDENCE/PERSON] and seized [ITEMS SEIZED]. No warrant was obtained and no recognized exception applied.
3. Interrogation. Following the seizure, Defendant was detained and questioned. [Indicate whether Miranda warnings were given.]
4. Resulting Evidence. The Commonwealth intends to introduce the seized items, Defendant’s statements, and laboratory results linking the items to Defendant.

IV. APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS

A. Constitutional Framework
1. The Fourth Amendment and Kentucky Constitution § 10 protect against unreasonable searches and seizures.
2. Warrantless searches are per se unreasonable absent a narrowly drawn exception. The Commonwealth bears the burden of proving the applicability of any exception.

B. Kentucky Procedural Requirements
1. Under Ky. R. Crim. P. 8.27, a defendant may move to suppress evidence prior to trial; factual disputes are resolved via an evidentiary hearing governed by RCr 9.78.
2. The Court must state essential findings of fact on the record. RCr 9.78.

C. Exclusionary Rule & Good-Faith Exception
1. Evidence obtained in violation of constitutional protections is inadmissible.
2. The “good-faith” exception does not apply where officers lacked an objectively reasonable belief in the legality of their conduct or where the conduct was the result of reckless disregard for constitutional requirements.

V. ARGUMENT

1. The Warrantless Search Was Unconstitutional.
   a. No exception—including consent, exigent circumstances, search incident to arrest, inventory, or automobile exception—exists on the present record.
   b. Officers lacked probable cause at the time of the search, as evidenced by [CITE RECORD FACTS].

2. Defendant’s Statements Were the Fruit of an Illegal Detention.
   a. Any statements followed an unlawful seizure; therefore, they are tainted and must be suppressed.
   b. Miranda warnings, if given, do not attenuate the constitutional violation under these facts.

3. The “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” Doctrine Requires Suppression of All Derivative Evidence.
   a. Lab results, chain-of-custody documentation, and any testimonial references to the seized items must likewise be excluded.

4. The Good-Faith Exception Is Inapplicable.
   a. Officers did not rely on a warrant, nor did they act on objectively reasonable authority.
   b. Suppression here will serve the deterrent purpose of the exclusionary rule and outweigh any societal cost.

VI. REQUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

Pursuant to RCr 9.78, Defendant requests an evidentiary hearing to resolve contested issues of fact, including but not limited to:
1. The officers’ basis for initiating contact;
2. The existence (or lack) of voluntary consent;
3. The timeline of events relative to Miranda warnings; and
4. The chain of custody of the seized evidence.

[// GUIDANCE: Attach proposed witness list and estimated time needed, if local rules require.]

VII. RELIEF REQUESTED

WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully prays that this Court:

A. Conduct an evidentiary hearing;
B. Enter an Order suppressing:
i. All physical evidence seized on [DATE];
ii. All oral or written statements allegedly made by Defendant; and
iii. Any and all derivative evidence;
C. Instruct the Commonwealth to refrain from referencing the suppressed evidence in the presence of the jury; and
D. Grant such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

VIII. NOTICE OF FILING

Notice is hereby given that the foregoing Motion to Suppress Evidence has been electronically filed with the Clerk of the [_____] Circuit Court on this [DAY] day of [MONTH] [YEAR], and that a true and correct copy has been served on the Office of the Commonwealth’s Attorney, [COUNTY] County, Kentucky.

IX. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on [DATE], a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion was served upon:

[NAME], Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney
[ADDRESS or ELECTRONIC SERVICE DETAILS]

by [method of service].

[ATTORNEY NAME] (KBA # [_____])
[Law Firm / Public Defender Office]
[Street Address]
[City, State, ZIP]
[Phone] | [Email]
Counsel for Defendant

X. PROPOSED ORDER

(Attach as “Exhibit A” or submit separately per local practice)

[// GUIDANCE: Provide the Court with a concise proposed Order reciting the granting of suppression and excluding specified evidence, leaving blanks for the Court’s factual findings.]

EXHIBIT A

[ PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPRESS ]
[Insert caption identical to front page]

The Court, having considered Defendant’s Motion to Suppress, the evidence presented, and being otherwise sufficiently advised, hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
2. The following evidence is SUPPRESSED and shall not be introduced at trial:
   a. [ITEMS]
   b. [STATEMENTS]
   c. Any derivative evidence.
3. The Commonwealth shall not reference the suppressed evidence in the presence of the jury.

SO ORDERED this _ day of __, 20___.

JUDGE, [_____] CIRCUIT COURT

[// GUIDANCE: Review local rules for any additional verifications (e.g., affidavit requirement) and ensure compliance with formatting standards such as double-spacing, font size, and margin specifications mandated by the specific Judicial Circuit.]