[COURT CAPTION]

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE [___] JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
[COUNTY] COUNTY, ILLINOIS

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. [____]
)
[DEFENDANT FULL LEGAL NAME], )
)
Defendant. )

MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
(725 ILCS 5/114-12; U.S. CONST. AMEND. IV;
ILL. CONST. 1970, ART. I §§ 6, 10, & 11)

[// GUIDANCE: Replace bracketed placeholders with party-specific information. Tailor factual allegations and legal arguments to the particular circumstances and evidence to be challenged.]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Notice of Motion ............................................... 2
II. Preliminary Statement ......................................... 3
III. Statement of Relevant Facts .................................. 3
IV. Legal Standards ............................................... 5
V. Argument ....................................................... 6
A. The Warrantless Search Was Unconstitutional .............. 7
B. Any Warrant Obtained Was Facially / Factually Defective .. 8
C. No Applicable Exception or Good-Faith Reliance Exists .... 9
VI. Request for Evidentiary Hearing .............................. 11
VII. Prayer for Relief ........................................... 11
VIII. Verification ............................................... 12
IX. Certificate of Service ....................................... 13
X. Proposed Order ................................................ 14

===================================================================
I. NOTICE OF MOTION
===================================================================
To: [Name/Address/Email of State’s Attorney]
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on [Hearing Date], at [Time] a.m./p.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, the undersigned will appear before the Honorable [Judge’s Name], or any judge sitting in his/her stead, in courtroom [Number] of the [County] County Courthouse, and present Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence, a copy of which is hereby served upon you.

DATED: [Date]

Respectfully submitted,
[DEFENSE COUNSEL NAME]
Attorney for Defendant
[Law Firm] | [Address] | [Phone] | [Email] | ARDC No. [_____]

===================================================================
II. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
===================================================================
1. Pursuant to 725 ILCS 5/114-12, Illinois Rules of Evidence, and the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Defendant [DEFENDANT NAME] respectfully moves this Court for entry of an order suppressing all physical evidence, statements, observations, and derivative fruits obtained as a result of the unconstitutional search, seizure, and custodial interrogation described herein.

===================================================================
III. STATEMENT OF RELEVANT FACTS
===================================================================
2. On or about [Date], members of the [Law-Enforcement Agency] conducted [describe search/seizure: e.g., “a warrantless stop and search of Defendant’s vehicle”].
3. Officers [Officer Names/Badge Nos.] allegedly recovered [describe evidence: e.g., “approximately 20 grams of a substance purported to be cocaine”] from [location].
4. No warrant had been issued before the search, and Defendant did not consent to the search or seizure.
5. [Optional: If a warrant was obtained:] Alternatively, officers obtained Warrant No. [_] issued by Judge [_] on [Date]. The supporting complaint/affidavit contained material misstatements and omissions, including but not limited to [list].
6. Defendant was taken into custody and interrogated without the benefit of Miranda warnings and without counsel present, resulting in the statements the State now seeks to admit.
7. Defendant timely files this Motion within 30 days after arraignment and prior to trial, as required by 725 ILCS 5/114-12(c).

[// GUIDANCE: Paragraphs 2-7 should be meticulously grounded in the discovery record (police reports, body-cam footage, transcripts). Attach exhibits (marked “A,” “B,” etc.) when available.]

===================================================================
IV. LEGAL STANDARDS
===================================================================
8. The proponent of a motion to suppress bears the burden of production, while the State bears the ultimate burden of persuasion once the defendant makes a prima facie showing of illegality. 725 ILCS 5/114-12(b); Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).
9. Warrantless searches are per se unreasonable unless they fall within a narrowly drawn exception. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
10. Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment must be excluded unless the State establishes the good-faith exception of United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), as codified in 725 ILCS 5/114-12(b) (good-faith reliance on a warrant later determined to be invalid).
11. The Illinois Constitution affords at least equal, and in some contexts broader, protections than its federal analogue. People v. Krueger, 175 Ill. 2d 60 (1996).

===================================================================
V. ARGUMENT
===================================================================
A. The Warrantless Search Was Unconstitutional
12. Officers lacked probable cause or reasonable articulable suspicion to justify the stop and ensuing search.
13. [Describe facts negating probable cause, e.g., “Defendant’s mere presence in a high-crime area coupled with nervous behavior does not supply probable cause.”]
14. No exigent circumstance, search-incident-to-arrest rationale, or other delineated exception applies.

B. Any Warrant Obtained Was Facially or Factually Defective
15. Even if the State relies on Warrant No. [____], suppression remains warranted because:
a. The affidavit omitted material exculpatory facts;
b. The informant’s reliability was unsubstantiated under the Aguilar-Spinelli test;
c. The items to be seized were not described with particularity as required by the Fourth Amendment and Ill. Const. art. I, § 6.
16. The resulting search was therefore unauthorized and unconstitutional.

C. The Good-Faith Exception Does Not Apply
17. Leon’s good-faith exception is inapplicable where the warrant is “so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable” or where officers act in objectively unreasonable reliance.
18. Here, Officer [Name] supplied demonstrably false statements (Ex. B) and failed to verify key details, defeating good-faith.
19. Consequently, exclusion is required to deter future misconduct.

===================================================================
VI. REQUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
===================================================================
20. Pursuant to 725 ILCS 5/114-12(d), Defendant requests a full evidentiary hearing at which the State must prove the legality of the search and seizure by a preponderance of the evidence.

===================================================================
VII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
===================================================================
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully prays that this Court:
a. Grant this Motion in its entirety;
b. Suppress all physical evidence, testimony, and statements obtained as a result of the unconstitutional search, seizure, and interrogation;
c. Bar any derivative fruits under the “fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree” doctrine;
d. Order any such further relief as this Court deems just and appropriate.

DATED: [Date]

Respectfully submitted,

[DEFENSE COUNSEL NAME], Esq.
Attorney for [DEFENDANT NAME]
[Law Firm / Address / Phone / Email / ARDC No.]

===================================================================
VIII. VERIFICATION
===================================================================
I, [DEFENSE COUNSEL NAME], being first duly sworn on oath, state that I have read the foregoing Motion to Suppress Evidence, that I have discussed the factual content with my client, and that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, the facts alleged therein are true and correct.

[DEFENSE COUNSEL NAME]

Subscribed and sworn before me on this ___ day of ____, 20__.

Notary Public

===================================================================
IX. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
===================================================================
The undersigned certifies that on [Date], he/she served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion to Suppress Evidence upon the [County] County State’s Attorney by [method: e-filing / hand delivery / email], in accordance with Illinois Supreme Court Rules 11 and 12.

[DEFENSE COUNSEL NAME]

===================================================================
X. PROPOSED ORDER
===================================================================
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE [___] JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
[COUNTY] COUNTY, ILLINOIS

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Case No. [____]
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Hon. [Judge’s Name]
)
[DEFENDANT NAME], )
)
Defendant. )

ORDER

THIS MATTER coming before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence, the Court being fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

☐ The Motion is GRANTED. All evidence obtained on [Date] by [Law-Enforcement Agency] and all derivative fruits are hereby SUPPRESSED and excluded from use in the above-captioned matter.

☐ The Motion is DENIED for the reasons stated on the record.

☐ The Court sets an evidentiary hearing on _, 20_, at ____ a.m./p.m.

ENTERED: ____, 20__

Judge, Circuit Court of [County] County, Illinois

[// GUIDANCE:
1. File the motion electronically (per the statewide e-filing mandate) or on paper only with affirmative leave of court.
2. Attach any relevant exhibits—search warrant, affidavits, police reports, body-cam videos (as electronic media), and transcript excerpts.
3. Calendar the motion to allow adequate time for an evidentiary hearing before trial.
4. Serve the State’s Attorney promptly; failure to comply with the 30-day rule under 725 ILCS 5/114-12(c) may result in waiver absent good cause.
5. For motions directed at statements (confessions), adapt citations to 725 ILCS 5/114-11 and provide Miranda-specific arguments.
]