State Court Motion for Summary Judgment

Ready to Edit

[CAPTION PAGE]

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY]

[PLAINTIFF NAME],
Plaintiff,
v.
[DEFENDANT NAME],
Defendant.

Case No.: [CASE NUMBER]

Assigned for All Purposes to:
Hon. [JUDGE NAME] – Dept. [DEPT.]

[PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT]'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES;
SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS;
DECLARATION(S) OF [DECLARANT NAME(S)] AND EXHIBITS

Date: [HEARING DATE]
Time: [HEARING TIME] a.m.
Dept.: [DEPT.]

Reservation ID: [IF APPLICABLE]


TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION ............................................... 1
  2. MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES ..................................... 3
    2.1 Introduction ............................................................................... 3
    2.2 Procedural Background ........................................................... 3
    2.3 Legal Standard ........................................................................ 4
    2.4 Undisputed Material Facts ...................................................... 5
    2.5 Argument ................................................................................. 6
    2.5.1 [First Cause of Action] .................................................. 6
    2.5.2 [Second Cause of Action] ............................................ 8
    2.6 Conclusion ............................................................................. 10

  3. SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS ................. 11

  4. DECLARATION(S) OF [DECLARANT] .................................................. 17
  5. PROOF OF SERVICE .......................................................................... 22

1. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on [HEARING DATE] at [HEARING TIME] a.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard in Department [DEPT.] of the above-entitled court, located at [COURTHOUSE ADDRESS], [PARTY MOVING] ("Movant") will and hereby does move the Court, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, for an order granting summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication of the issues specified herein.

This motion is made on the grounds that there is no triable issue of material fact and Movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on each cause of action (or specified issues) asserted in the [COMPLAINT/CROSS-COMPLAINT].

The motion is based upon this Notice, the accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts ("SSUMF"), the Declaration(s) of [DECLARANT NAME(S)] and exhibits thereto, all pleadings and records on file, and upon such further oral or documentary evidence as may be presented at the hearing.

Dated: [DATE]

________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
[Law Firm]
Attorneys for [PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT]


2. MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

2.1 Introduction

[Concise one-paragraph overview of the case, relief sought, and why summary judgment is appropriate.]

2.2 Procedural Background

  1. Complaint filed: [DATE].
  2. Answer filed: [DATE].
  3. Discovery completed: [DATE].
  4. Trial set: [DATE].

2.3 Legal Standard

Under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c(a)–(p), summary judgment shall be granted when "all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." A defendant meets its burden by showing that one or more elements of the cause of action cannot be established or that an affirmative defense bars recovery. Id. § 437c(p)(2).

The moving papers must include a SSUMF in compliance with Cal. R. Ct. 3.1350(d) and (h). Supporting evidence may consist of declarations, deposition excerpts, discovery responses, admissions, and matters subject to judicial notice. See Cal. R. Ct. 3.1350(a), (b).

2.4 Undisputed Material Facts

For ease of reference, the SSUMF filed concurrently herewith identifies each material fact, cites the supporting evidence, and demonstrates the absence of any genuine dispute.

2.5 Argument

2.5.1 First Cause of Action – [NAME]

(1) Undisputed material facts establish each element of [PARTY]'s claim/defense.
(2) Alternatively, plaintiff cannot establish [element] because [reason].
(3) Therefore, defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

2.5.2 Second Cause of Action – [NAME]

[Legal analysis with pinpoint reference to SSUMF ¶¶ __ and evidence Exhibit __.]

2.6 Conclusion

Because no triable issue of material fact exists and the law entitles Movant to judgment, the Court should grant summary judgment in favor of [PARTY], or alternatively, summary adjudication of the issues identified above.


3. SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS

(Cal. R. Ct. 3.1350(d), (h))


MOVING PARTY'S UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE OPPOSING PARTY'S RESPONSE AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
FACT NO. 1: [State fact #1. Facts must be material to the causes of action or defenses at issue. Avoid legal conclusions or argument.] ☐ Undisputed ☐ Disputed
Supporting Evidence: Declaration of [NAME], ¶ [X], Exhibit [A] ("[DOCUMENT TITLE]"), p. [X]:ll. [X-X] Response: [Leave blank for opposing party]
Opposing Evidence: [Leave blank for opposing party]
------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------
FACT NO. 2: [State fact #2.] ☐ Undisputed ☐ Disputed
Supporting Evidence: Deposition of [NAME], [DATE], pp. [X]:ll. [X] – [X]:ll. [X], Exhibit [B] Response: [Leave blank for opposing party]
Opposing Evidence: [Leave blank for opposing party]
------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------
FACT NO. 3: [State fact #3.] ☐ Undisputed ☐ Disputed
Supporting Evidence: [PARTY]'s Response to Request for Admission No. [X], Set [One], Exhibit [C] Response: [Leave blank for opposing party]
Opposing Evidence: [Leave blank for opposing party]
------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------
FACT NO. 4: [Continue numbering consecutively...] ☐ Undisputed ☐ Disputed
Supporting Evidence: [Citation with exhibit letter/number, document title, specific page:line] Response: [Leave blank for opposing party]
Opposing Evidence: [Leave blank for opposing party]


4. DECLARATION OF [DECLARANT NAME]

I, [DECLARANT NAME], declare:

  1. I am [title/relationship to party]. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein and could competently testify thereto if called.
  2. On [DATE], I [signed/executed/received] [relevant document]. A true and correct copy is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
  3. [Additional foundational facts establishing authentication, relevance, and admissibility.]

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on [DATE] at [CITY], California.

________________________________
[DECLARANT NAME]


5. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING [PARTY]'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IMPORTANT: This proposed order must be LODGED with the court, NOT filed or attached to the motion papers. (Cal. R. Ct. 3.1113(m); see also 3.1312 for lodging mechanics)


The Motion for Summary Judgment (or, in the alternative, Summary Adjudication) filed by [PARTY] came on regularly for hearing on [DATE], the Honorable [JUDGE NAME] presiding. Having considered the papers submitted and good cause appearing:

IT IS ORDERED that:

  1. [PARTY]'s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in its entirety.
    OR
    1(a). Summary Adjudication is GRANTED as to the following issues: [specify].

  2. Judgment shall be entered in favor of [PARTY] and against [OPPOSING PARTY].

  3. [PARTY] shall recover its costs of suit in an amount to be determined.

DATED: ______________

________________________________
HON. [JUDGE NAME]
Judge of the Superior Court


6. PROOF OF SERVICE

(C.C.P. §§ 1013, 1013a; Cal. R. Ct. 2.251(c))

I am employed in the County of [COUNTY], State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to this action. My business address is [ADDRESS].

On [DATE], I served the foregoing document(s) described as:

• [PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT]'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS; DECLARATION(S) OF [DECLARANT NAME(S)] AND EXHIBITS

on the interested parties in this action by:

☐ E-MAIL / ELECTRONIC SERVICE (CCP § 1010.6)
☐ OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
☐ FIRST-CLASS MAIL
☐ PERSONAL SERVICE

[to] [NAME & ADDRESS OF RECIPIENT(S)]

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on [DATE] at [CITY], California.

________________________________
[NAME OF DECLARANT]


KEY CALIFORNIA SUMMARY JUDGMENT REQUIREMENTS

1. Timing Deadlines (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 437c)

Document Deadline
Motion Served at least 81 days before hearing (§ 437c(a)(2))
Opposition Due 20 days before hearing (§ 437c(b)(2))
Reply Due 11 days before hearing (§ 437c(b)(4))

Service Extensions (add to 81-day requirement):

  • Electronic service: Add 2 court days (CCP § 1010.6(a)(3)(B))
  • Mail within California: Add 5 calendar days (CCP § 1013(a))
  • Mail outside California: Add 10 calendar days (CCP § 1013(a))
  • Overnight delivery: Add 2 court days (CCP § 1013(c))

2. Page Limits (Cal. R. Ct. 3.1113(d))

Document Maximum Pages
Opening Memorandum 20 pages
Opposition Memorandum 20 pages
Reply Memorandum 10 pages
Separate Statement No limit (must comply with Rule 3.1350 format)

Excluded from page count: Caption page, table of contents, table of authorities, signature block, proof of service, exhibits.

3. Separate Statement Format (Cal. R. Ct. 3.1350(d), (h))

Required format per Rule 3.1350(h):

  • Each fact must be stated separately and numbered consecutively
  • Two-column format: Moving party's facts/evidence on left; space for opposing party's response on right
  • Citations must include: exhibit letter/number, document title, specific page and line numbers
  • Facts must be material and non-argumentative

4. Proposed Order Requirements (Cal. R. Ct. 3.1113(m))

CRITICAL: The proposed order must be:

  • LODGED with the court, not filed (see CRC 3.1312 for lodging mechanics)
  • SERVED on all parties with the moving papers
  • NOT ATTACHED to the motion papers (CRC 3.1113(m) expressly prohibits attachment)

5. Evidentiary Rules

  • Declarations must set out facts admissible in evidence (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 2015.5)
  • Documents must be properly authenticated (Evid. Code §§ 1400–1402)
  • Judicial notice requests must comply with Evid. Code §§ 452, 453
  • Objections to evidence must be made in writing (CCP § 437c(q))

6. Meet and Confer Requirement (Cal. R. Ct. 3.1350(b))

Before filing a motion for summary adjudication on less than all causes of action, the moving party must meet and confer with the opposing party to attempt to reach agreement on which issues are disputed and undisputed.


LOCAL RULES CHECKLIST

Before filing, verify the following for your specific court:

Hearing Reservation – Is online reservation required? What system?
E-Filing – Mandatory? Which provider (File & Serve, One Legal, etc.)?
PDF Bookmarking – Required? Specific bookmarking requirements?
Courtesy Copies – Required? How many? Tabbed? Bound?
Tentative Ruling System – Does the court post tentatives? Call-in procedure?
Department-Specific Rules – Does the assigned department have additional requirements?
Document Formatting – 28 lines per page? Double-spaced? Font requirements?

Common Local Rule Variations by County:

County Key Requirements
Los Angeles Mandatory e-filing; specific bookmarking; tentative rulings; LASC Local Rules
San Francisco Tentatives posted online; specific courtesy copy rules
Orange Specific e-filing/lodging procedures; Complex Civil rules
San Diego Department-specific procedures vary significantly
Santa Clara Specific PDF formatting requirements

FINAL DRAFTING NOTES


This template is intentionally comprehensive yet modular. Attorneys should customize factual content, evidentiary citations, and local rule references before filing.

Ezel AI
Hi! I can rewrite every section of this to your exact case in about 5 minutes. Heads up: I'm $49 for a one-shot, or $249/mo if you want unlimited docs. But that's still less than 10 minutes of what a lawyer charges to even look at this. Want me to do it?
AI Legal Assistant
Ezel AI
Hi! I can rewrite every section of this to your exact case in about 5 minutes. Heads up: I'm $49 for a one-shot, or $249/mo if you want unlimited docs. But that's still less than 10 minutes of what a lawyer charges to even look at this. Want me to do it?

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
state_court_motion_for_summary_judgment_ca.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Customize this document with Ezel

  • Deep Legal Knowledge
    Understands case law, statutes, and legal doctrine specific to California.
  • Court-Ready Formatting
    Proper captions, certificates of service, and local rule compliance.
  • AI-Powered Editing on Your Timeline
    Edit as many times as you need. Tailor every section to your specific case.
  • Export as PDF & Word
    Download your finished document in professional PDF or DOCX format, ready to file or send.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About This Template

These are the filings that drive a lawsuit through the system: complaints, answers, motions, briefs, discovery requests and responses, and post-judgment papers. Each has its own format requirements under federal and state procedural rules, and each has a deadline that cannot be missed without consequences. Clean, procedurally correct filings move a case forward; sloppy ones invite motions to strike, amended responses, and avoidable delays.

Important Notice

This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Last updated: May 2026