State Court Discovery - Interrogatories - Oregon

Oregon Litigation & Court Documents Updated July 30, 2026 Free Word and PDF

OREGON INTERROGATORIES — DO NOT SERVE

Discovery-Method Conversion Worksheet

Current official ORCP 36 A lists these discovery methods:

  • depositions on oral examination or written questions;
  • production of documents or things, or permission to enter land or other property for inspection and other purposes;
  • physical and mental examinations; and
  • requests for admission.

Party-served written interrogatories are not included. This file therefore is not a discovery request, does not create a response deadline, and must not be captioned or served as interrogatories in an Oregon circuit-court action.

Use this worksheet only to organize factual topics for Oregon counsel to convert into an authorized discovery device under the current ORCP, the court's scheduling order, and any case-specific order.


1. CASE INFORMATION

Field Entry
Court and county [________________________________]
Case name [________________________________]
Case number [________________________________]
Requesting party [________________________________]
Responding party or witness [________________________________]
Current discovery cutoff [__/__/____]
Case-specific discovery order [ATTACH / NONE IDENTIFIED]

2. METHOD SELECTION

For each topic below, Oregon counsel should select an authorized method and prepare the separate document required for that method.

  • ☐ Deposition on oral examination
  • ☐ Deposition on written questions
  • ☐ Request for production or inspection
  • ☐ Physical or mental examination request or motion, if applicable
  • ☐ Request for admission
  • ☐ Informal disclosure request permitted by agreement or order
  • ☐ Other authorized procedure: [________________________________]

Do not assume that a question suitable for an interrogatory in another jurisdiction can be copied verbatim into an Oregon request for admission, production request, or deposition notice.


3. FACT AND WITNESS TOPICS

3.1 Persons with Knowledge

Identify the persons believed to have knowledge of the claims or defenses, the subject of each person's knowledge, and the authorized method counsel will use to obtain the information.

Person or category Subject of knowledge Proposed method
[________________________________] [________________________________] [________________________________]
[________________________________] [________________________________] [________________________________]

3.2 Claim and Defense Contentions

Contention to investigate Supporting facts sought Proposed method
Denial or affirmative defense: [________________] [________________________________] [________________________________]
Counterclaim or mitigation theory: [___________] [________________________________] [________________________________]
Third-party responsibility: [__________________] [________________________________] [________________________________]

4. DOCUMENT AND ESI TOPICS

List the records sought without converting this worksheet into a production request.

  • ☐ Communications concerning the events at issue
  • ☐ Contracts, policies, procedures, and retention schedules
  • ☐ Photographs, video, audio, and social-media content
  • ☐ Medical, employment, accounting, or transaction records relevant to pleaded issues
  • ☐ Investigation, audit, or incident records
  • ☐ Insurance agreements or policies potentially responsive under current ORCP 36 B(2)
  • ☐ Electronically stored information and relevant custodians
  • ☐ Other: [________________________________]
Record category Date range Custodian or location Proposed method
[________________________________] [________________________________] [________________________________] [________________________________]
[________________________________] [________________________________] [________________________________] [________________________________]

5. ADMISSION TOPICS

Draft only narrow propositions that counsel determines are appropriate for a current ORCP request for admission.

Proposed proposition Purpose Counsel-approved wording
[________________________________] [________________________________] [________________________________]
[________________________________] [________________________________] [________________________________]

6. DEPOSITION TOPICS

  • Witness or organization: [________________________________]
  • Proposed oral or written-question format: [________________________________]
  • Subjects for examination: [________________________________]
  • Documents to coordinate with the deposition: [________________________________]
  • Court order or stipulation needed: [________________________________]

7. COUNSEL REVIEW CHECKLIST

  • ☐ Confirm the current official ORCP edition and any amendments effective before service.
  • ☐ Confirm the selected method is authorized for this case.
  • ☐ Confirm the court's scheduling order and discovery cutoff.
  • ☐ Confirm service, response, objection, and motion deadlines for the selected method.
  • ☐ Review proportionality, privilege, work-product, privacy, and protective-order issues.
  • ☐ Prepare a separate, method-specific discovery document.
  • ☐ Do not serve this worksheet.

SOURCES AND REFERENCES

  • Oregon Legislature, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure (current official compilation): https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/SiteAssets/ORCP.html
  • ORCP 36 A, “Discovery methods” (same official compilation)

IMPORTANT: Oregon does not list party interrogatories among the discovery methods in ORCP 36 A. This worksheet is an internal planning aid only and is not a discovery request.

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)Choose a plan

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
state_court_discovery_interrogatories_or.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Draft it in the editor

The AI drafts each section from your answers and you review every word. Drafting from scratch takes hours; finish yours for $99 one time.

  • Built on this template
    Uses the Oregon version and the statutes it cites.
  • Formatted like the template
    Captions, numbering and layout stay intact.
  • AI editing
    Rewrite any section from your own notes.
  • Export as PDF and Word
    Yours to review, sign, or file.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About this template

Last updated
July 30, 2026
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Category
Litigation & Court Documents

Legal authority

  • ORCP 36 A (authorized discovery methods; party interrogatories are not listed)

These are the filings that drive a lawsuit through the system: complaints, answers, motions, briefs, discovery requests and responses, and post-judgment papers. Each has its own format requirements under federal and state procedural rules, and each has a deadline that cannot be missed without consequences. Clean, procedurally correct filings move a case forward; sloppy ones invite motions to strike, amended responses, and avoidable delays.

Not legal advice

This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Checked against the law it cites

The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.

Draft your State Court Discovery - Interrogatories in the editor

Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.