State Court Discovery - Interrogatories - Oregon
OREGON INTERROGATORIES — DO NOT SERVE
Discovery-Method Conversion Worksheet
Current official ORCP 36 A lists these discovery methods:
- depositions on oral examination or written questions;
- production of documents or things, or permission to enter land or other property for inspection and other purposes;
- physical and mental examinations; and
- requests for admission.
Party-served written interrogatories are not included. This file therefore is not a discovery request, does not create a response deadline, and must not be captioned or served as interrogatories in an Oregon circuit-court action.
Use this worksheet only to organize factual topics for Oregon counsel to convert into an authorized discovery device under the current ORCP, the court's scheduling order, and any case-specific order.
1. CASE INFORMATION
| Field | Entry |
|---|---|
| Court and county | [________________________________] |
| Case name | [________________________________] |
| Case number | [________________________________] |
| Requesting party | [________________________________] |
| Responding party or witness | [________________________________] |
| Current discovery cutoff | [__/__/____] |
| Case-specific discovery order | [ATTACH / NONE IDENTIFIED] |
2. METHOD SELECTION
For each topic below, Oregon counsel should select an authorized method and prepare the separate document required for that method.
- ☐ Deposition on oral examination
- ☐ Deposition on written questions
- ☐ Request for production or inspection
- ☐ Physical or mental examination request or motion, if applicable
- ☐ Request for admission
- ☐ Informal disclosure request permitted by agreement or order
- ☐ Other authorized procedure: [________________________________]
Do not assume that a question suitable for an interrogatory in another jurisdiction can be copied verbatim into an Oregon request for admission, production request, or deposition notice.
3. FACT AND WITNESS TOPICS
3.1 Persons with Knowledge
Identify the persons believed to have knowledge of the claims or defenses, the subject of each person's knowledge, and the authorized method counsel will use to obtain the information.
| Person or category | Subject of knowledge | Proposed method |
|---|---|---|
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
3.2 Claim and Defense Contentions
| Contention to investigate | Supporting facts sought | Proposed method |
|---|---|---|
| Denial or affirmative defense: [________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
| Counterclaim or mitigation theory: [___________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
| Third-party responsibility: [__________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
4. DOCUMENT AND ESI TOPICS
List the records sought without converting this worksheet into a production request.
- ☐ Communications concerning the events at issue
- ☐ Contracts, policies, procedures, and retention schedules
- ☐ Photographs, video, audio, and social-media content
- ☐ Medical, employment, accounting, or transaction records relevant to pleaded issues
- ☐ Investigation, audit, or incident records
- ☐ Insurance agreements or policies potentially responsive under current ORCP 36 B(2)
- ☐ Electronically stored information and relevant custodians
- ☐ Other: [________________________________]
| Record category | Date range | Custodian or location | Proposed method |
|---|---|---|---|
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
5. ADMISSION TOPICS
Draft only narrow propositions that counsel determines are appropriate for a current ORCP request for admission.
| Proposed proposition | Purpose | Counsel-approved wording |
|---|---|---|
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
6. DEPOSITION TOPICS
- Witness or organization: [________________________________]
- Proposed oral or written-question format: [________________________________]
- Subjects for examination: [________________________________]
- Documents to coordinate with the deposition: [________________________________]
- Court order or stipulation needed: [________________________________]
7. COUNSEL REVIEW CHECKLIST
- ☐ Confirm the current official ORCP edition and any amendments effective before service.
- ☐ Confirm the selected method is authorized for this case.
- ☐ Confirm the court's scheduling order and discovery cutoff.
- ☐ Confirm service, response, objection, and motion deadlines for the selected method.
- ☐ Review proportionality, privilege, work-product, privacy, and protective-order issues.
- ☐ Prepare a separate, method-specific discovery document.
- ☐ Do not serve this worksheet.
SOURCES AND REFERENCES
- Oregon Legislature, Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure (current official compilation): https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/SiteAssets/ORCP.html
- ORCP 36 A, “Discovery methods” (same official compilation)
IMPORTANT: Oregon does not list party interrogatories among the discovery methods in ORCP 36 A. This worksheet is an internal planning aid only and is not a discovery request.
About this template
- Last updated
- July 30, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon
- Category
- Litigation & Court Documents
Legal authority
- ORCP 36 A (authorized discovery methods; party interrogatories are not listed)
These are the filings that drive a lawsuit through the system: complaints, answers, motions, briefs, discovery requests and responses, and post-judgment papers. Each has its own format requirements under federal and state procedural rules, and each has a deadline that cannot be missed without consequences. Clean, procedurally correct filings move a case forward; sloppy ones invite motions to strike, amended responses, and avoidable delays.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.
Draft your State Court Discovery - Interrogatories in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.