State Court Complaint - Personal Injury - California
COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY – CALIFORNIA STATE COURT
(Template – For Attorney Customization)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Document Header & Caption
-
Preliminary Allegations
2.1 Parties
2.2 Jurisdiction and Venue
2.3 Doe Defendants -
General Allegations (Facts)
-
Causes of Action
4.1 First Cause of Action – Negligence
4.2 [Optional] Second Cause of Action – Negligence Per Se
4.3 [Optional] Additional Causes of Action (e.g., Premises Liability) -
Damages Allegations
- Prayer for Relief
- Jury Demand
- Verification
1. DOCUMENT HEADER & CAPTION
[ATTORNEY OR FIRM NAME]
[State Bar No.]
[Street Address]
[City, State ZIP]
Telephone: [___-___-____]
Facsimile: [___-___-____]
E-Mail: [___]
Attorney for Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF NAME]
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME]
| [PLAINTIFF NAME], | Case No.: [___] |
| Plaintiff, | COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY (NEGLIGENCE) |
| v. | |
| [DEFENDANT NAME(S)] and DOES 1-50, | [DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL] |
| Defendants. |
2. PRELIMINARY ALLEGATIONS
2.1 Parties
- Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF NAME] (“Plaintiff”) is, and at all relevant times was, an individual residing in the State of California, County of [___].
- Defendant [PRIMARY DEFENDANT NAME] (“Defendant”) is, and at all relevant times was, a [corporation/LLC/individual/etc.] doing business in the County of [___], State of California.
- The true names and capacities of DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, are presently unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues such defendants by fictitious names pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. § 474. Plaintiff will amend this Complaint to allege their true names and capacities when ascertained.
- Each defendant was the agent, servant, employee, partner, joint venturer, alter ego, and/or co-conspirator of the other defendants, and in doing the things herein alleged was acting within the course and scope of such relationship and with the permission and ratification of each of the other defendants.
2.2 Jurisdiction and Venue
- This Court has original jurisdiction over this personal-injury action under Cal. Const. art. VI, § 10. The amount in controversy exceeds $35,000, so this is an unlimited civil case rather than a limited civil case under Code Civ. Proc. § 85(a).
- Venue is proper in this County under Code Civ. Proc. § 395(a) because the injury-producing events occurred here and at least one defendant resides or does business here.
2.3 Doe Defendants
- Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that each DOE defendant was negligent, and such negligence was a proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injuries described below.
3. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS (FACTS)
- On or about [DATE], at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was [location – e.g., “lawfully walking on the sidewalk adjacent to 123 Main Street, Anytown, California”] when [describe incident factually and specifically: e.g., “Defendant’s delivery truck struck Plaintiff” OR “Plaintiff slipped on a wet substance in Defendant’s store aisle”].
- [Set forth additional ultimate facts establishing duty, breach, causation, and damages. Identify any statutes, ordinances, or regulations breached if pursuing negligence per se.]
- As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ conduct, Plaintiff sustained severe physical injuries, including but not limited to [describe injuries], incurred medical expenses, suffered lost earnings, and experienced pain, suffering, and emotional distress.
4. CAUSES OF ACTION
4.1 First Cause of Action – Negligence
(Against All Defendants)
- Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through [last] as though fully set forth herein.
- Under California law, every person is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for injuries to another caused by want of ordinary care or skill in the management of property or person. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714.
- Defendants owed Plaintiff a duty of ordinary care in [describe the relevant activity or premises].
- Defendants breached that duty by [specific acts/omissions].
- Defendants’ breach was a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff’s injuries and damages as alleged.
- Pursuant to California’s pure comparative fault system, Plaintiff’s recovery shall be reduced only by the percentage of fault, if any, attributable to Plaintiff.
- Under Cal. Civ. Code § 1431.2 (Proposition 51), Defendants are jointly and severally liable for 100 percent of Plaintiff’s economic damages and severally liable for their comparative shares of noneconomic damages.
4.2 [Optional] Second Cause of Action – Negligence Per Se
(Against All Defendants)
- Plaintiff realleges Paragraphs 1 through [last].
- [Identify safety statute/regulation] was enacted to protect the class of persons that includes Plaintiff from the type of injury sustained herein.
- Defendants violated the statute/regulation by [conduct], and that violation proximately caused Plaintiff's injury. If the violation, protected-harm, and protected-class conditions are proved, Cal. Evid. Code § 669 supplies a rebuttable presumption of failure to exercise due care.
4.3 [Optional] Additional Causes of Action
5. DAMAGES ALLEGATIONS
-
As a proximate result of Defendants’ acts and omissions, Plaintiff has incurred and will continue to incur:
a. Past and future medical expenses, hospital costs, rehabilitation, and related health-care costs;
b. Past and future loss of earnings and impairment of earning capacity;
c. Past and future pain, suffering, inconvenience, anxiety, and emotional distress;
d. [If applicable] Property damage and related losses;
e. [If applicable] Loss of consortium;
f. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; and
g. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. -
Plaintiff reserves the right to seek punitive damages if discovery reveals conscious disregard, oppression, fraud, or malice by any defendant.
-
Plaintiff acknowledges that certain categories of noneconomic damages may be subject to statutory limitations (e.g., Cal. Civ. Code § 3333.2 for professional negligence by a health-care provider). Plaintiff reserves the right to contest the applicability of any cap and to seek the maximum damages permitted by law.
6. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, as follows:
- For general (noneconomic) damages according to proof;
- For special (economic) damages according to proof;
- For punitive or exemplary damages as permitted by law;
- For pre-judgment interest under Cal. Civ. Code § 3288 and post-judgment interest under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 685.010;
- For costs of suit incurred herein; and
- For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
7. JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury on all issues so triable as a matter of right under Article I, § 16 of the California Constitution and Code Civ. Proc. § 631.
8. VERIFICATION
I, [PLAINTIFF NAME], am the Plaintiff in this action. I have read the foregoing Complaint and am informed and believe that the matters stated therein are true. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on [DATE], at [CITY], California.
____________________________________
[PLAINTIFF NAME]
END OF COMPLAINT TEMPLATE
About this template
- Last updated
- October 8, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- California
- Category
- Litigation & Court Documents
Legal authority
- Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 (two-year statute of limitations for personal injury)
- Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 85, 86, 88 (limited/unlimited civil case classification, amount in controversy $35,000, amended by SB 71 eff. Jan. 1, 2024)
- Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 395(a) (venue)
- Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 410.10 (personal jurisdiction)
- Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 474 (Doe defendants)
- Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 631 (jury trial)
- Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 685.010 (post-judgment interest)
- Cal. Const. art. I, § 16 (right to jury trial)
- Cal. Civ. Code § 1714 (general duty of ordinary care)
- Cal. Civ. Code § 1431.2 (Prop. 51 – several liability for noneconomic damages)
- Cal. Civ. Code § 3288 (pre-judgment interest in tort actions)
- Cal. Civ. Code § 3294 (punitive damages – malice, oppression, or fraud)
- Cal. Civ. Code § 3333.2 (MICRA noneconomic-damages cap – health-care professional negligence only)
- Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal. 3d 804 (1975) (pure comparative negligence, judicial doctrine)
These are the filings that drive a lawsuit through the system: complaints, answers, motions, briefs, discovery requests and responses, and post-judgment papers. Each has its own format requirements under federal and state procedural rules, and each has a deadline that cannot be missed without consequences. Clean, procedurally correct filings move a case forward; sloppy ones invite motions to strike, amended responses, and avoidable delays.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.
Cal. Const. art. VI, § 10 (checked October 8, 2026): "Superior courts have original jurisdiction in all other causes."
Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 85(a) (checked October 8, 2026): "The amount in controversy does not exceed thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000)."
Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 410.10 (checked October 8, 2026): "A court of this state may exercise jurisdiction on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States."
Cal. Evid. Code § 669(a) (checked September 30, 2026): "(a) The failure of a person to exercise due care is presumed if: (1) He violated a statute, ordinance, or regulation of a public entity; (2) The violation proximately caused death or injury to person or property; (3) The death or injury resulted from an occurrence of the nature which the statute, ordinance, or regulation was designed to prevent; and (4) The person suffering the death or the injury to his person or property was one of the class of persons for whose protection the statute, ordinance, or regulation was adopted."
Draft your State Court Complaint - Personal Injury in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.