Appeal from Final Decision of Administrative Agency - Connecticut

APPEAL FROM FINAL DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY

State of Connecticut

Connecticut Uniform Administrative Procedure Act, C.G.S. § 4-183

COURT CAPTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF [________________________________]

Docket No.: ___________________

[________________________________],
Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

[________________________________],
Defendant/Appellee.

APPEAL FROM FINAL DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Preliminary Statement
2. Parties
3. Jurisdiction and Venue
4. Timeliness of Appeal
5. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies
6. Aggrievement
7. Statement of the Case
8. Standard of Review
9. Claims for Relief
10. Request for Stay of Agency Action
11. Prayer for Relief
12. Verification
13. Signature Block
14. Certificate of Service

I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1. Plaintiff/Appellant [________________________________] ("Appellant") hereby appeals pursuant to C.G.S. § 4-183 from the final decision (the "Decision") of [________________________________] (the "Agency"), dated [__/__/____], and mailed to the Appellant on [__/__/____].

2. The Decision [describe action]: [________________________________]

3. The Decision should be reversed because: [________________________________]

II. PARTIES

A. Appellant

Full Legal Name: [________________________________]

Entity Type: ☐ Individual ☐ Corporation ☐ LLC ☐ Partnership ☐ Other: [____]

Address: [________________________________]

City, State, ZIP: [________________________________]

Telephone: [________________________________]

Email: [________________________________]

B. Appellee Agency

Agency Name: [________________________________]

Enabling Statute: [________________________________]

Principal Office Address: [________________________________]

City, State, ZIP: [________________________________]

III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

3.1 Statutory Basis. This Court has jurisdiction under C.G.S. § 4-183(a), which provides that a person who has exhausted all administrative remedies available within the agency and who is aggrieved by a final decision may appeal to the Superior Court.

3.2 Venue. Under C.G.S. § 4-183(c), venue is proper in the judicial district of:

☐ The judicial district of New Britain (for state agency decisions)
☐ The judicial district in which the Appellant resides
☐ The judicial district of New Britain (if the Appellant is not a Connecticut resident)

3.3 Governing Law. This Appeal is governed by the Connecticut Constitution and the Connecticut Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (C.G.S. § 4-166 et seq.), as well as the Connecticut Practice Book § 14-7 et seq.

IV. TIMELINESS OF APPEAL

4.1 The applicable statutory event under C.G.S. § 4-183(c) was [mailing of the final decision / personal delivery where there was no mailing / denial of reconsideration / mailing or delivery of a decision after reconsideration / expiration of the reconsideration decision period] on [__/__/____]. If more than one event applies, explain which later statutory trigger controls: [________________________________].

4.2 Under C.G.S. § 4-183(c), the appeal generally must be filed and served within forty-five (45) days after the applicable event identified above. The calculated deadline is [__/__/____].

4.3 This Appeal is filed on [__/__/____] and served on the agency on [__/__/____], within the applicable 45-day statutory period. Service on the other parties listed in the decision: [names, methods, and dates: __________________________________].

4.4 Jurisdictional Requirement. The 45-day filing deadline is jurisdictional and mandatory. Failure to file within 45 days deprives this Court of subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal. Glastonbury Volunteer Ambulance Ass'n v. Freedom of Information Comm'n, 227 Conn. 848 (1993).

V. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

5.1 Appellant has exhausted all administrative remedies available within the Agency, including:

☐ Filing a response to the Agency's notice or contested case filing
☐ Participating in the contested case hearing on [__/__/____]
☐ Presenting evidence and testimony
☐ Filing post-hearing briefs
☐ Filing a petition for reconsideration (if applicable)
☐ Other: [________________________________]

5.2 The Agency issued its final Decision on [__/__/____].

5.3 No further intra-agency review or administrative remedy is available.

VI. AGGRIEVEMENT

6.1 Under C.G.S. § 4-183(a), a person may appeal only if "aggrieved" by the agency's final decision. A person is aggrieved if the agency's decision has a specific, personal, and legal interest that is adversely affected by the decision.

6.2 Appellant is aggrieved because:

☐ The Decision directly and adversely affects Appellant's [license / permit / rights / benefits / property interest / other]: [________________________________]

☐ Appellant has a specific, personal, and legal interest in the subject matter of the Decision, distinct from any general interest shared by all members of the community.

6.3 The specific harm suffered by Appellant includes: [________________________________]

VII. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

A. Background

7.1 [________________________________] (describe the regulatory matter and Agency authority)

7.2 On [__/__/____], the Agency [commenced contested case proceedings / issued notice / denied application]: [________________________________]

B. Administrative Proceedings

7.3 Pursuant to C.G.S. § 4-177, the Agency conducted a contested case hearing on [__/__/____].

7.4 The hearing was conducted before [________________________________] (Hearing Officer / Board / Commissioner).

7.5 Key evidence and testimony:

• [________________________________]
• [________________________________]
• [________________________________]

C. The Final Decision

7.6 On [__/__/____], the Agency issued its final Decision finding: [________________________________]

7.7 The Decision imposed: [________________________________]

D. Service and Record

7.8 The final Decision was served by mail on [__/__/____].

7.9 The Agency must transmit the administrative record to this Court within thirty (30) days after service of this appeal, unless the court allows more time. C.G.S. § 4-183(g).

VIII. STANDARD OF REVIEW

8.1 Under C.G.S. § 4-183(j), the Court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact. The Court shall affirm the decision of the agency unless the Court finds that substantial rights of the Appellant have been prejudiced because the administrative findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are:

1. ☐ (1) In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions;
2. ☐ (2) In excess of the statutory authority of the agency;
3. ☐ (3) Made upon unlawful procedure;
4. ☐ (4) Affected by other error of law;
5. ☐ (5) Clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence on the whole record; or
6. ☐ (6) Arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion.

8.2 Review of Agency Fact-Finding. The substantial-evidence rule governs judicial review of administrative fact-finding under the UAPA. The court asks whether the administrative record contains substantial evidence supporting the agency's basic findings and whether its conclusions reasonably follow from those findings; it may not retry the facts or reweigh the evidence. C.G.S. § 4-183(j); Dolgner v. Alander, 237 Conn. 272, 281 (1996), quoted in Avon v. Sastre, 224 Conn. App. 155, 163-64 (2024).

8.3 Questions of Law. The court reviews questions of law, including statutory interpretation, under a plenary or de novo standard. Dept. of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information Comm'n, 298 Conn. 703 (2010).

8.4 Substantial Rights Requirement. The reviewing court must find that the agency's error prejudiced the Appellant's "substantial rights" before granting relief.

IX. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION: Violation of Statutory Provisions (C.G.S. § 4-183(j)(1))

9.1 The Decision violates the following statutory provisions: [________________________________]

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION: Action in Excess of Statutory Authority (C.G.S. § 4-183(j)(2))

9.2 The Agency exceeded its statutory authority because: [________________________________]

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION: Clearly Erroneous Findings (C.G.S. § 4-183(j)(5))

9.3 The following findings are clearly erroneous in light of the whole record: [________________________________]

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION: Error of Law (C.G.S. § 4-183(j)(4))

9.4 The Decision is affected by the following errors of law: [________________________________]

FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION: Arbitrary, Capricious, or Abuse of Discretion (C.G.S. § 4-183(j)(6))

9.5 The Decision is arbitrary, capricious, or constitutes an abuse of discretion because: [________________________________]

SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION: Unlawful Procedure (C.G.S. § 4-183(j)(3))

9.6 The Agency violated the following procedural requirements: [________________________________]

SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION: Declaratory Relief

9.7 Appellant seeks a judicial declaration that the Decision is void and unenforceable.

X. REQUEST FOR STAY OF AGENCY ACTION

10.1 Pursuant to C.G.S. § 4-183(f), Appellant requests that the Agency (or this Court) stay enforcement of the Decision pending this appeal.

10.2 Under C.G.S. § 4-183(f), upon motion of a party to the appeal, the agency or the court may stay the effectiveness of the agency's final decision pending determination of the appeal. In determining whether or not to grant such stay, the court or agency shall consider the factors relevant to stays in civil actions.

10.3 Grounds for stay:

☐ Appellant is likely to prevail on the merits
☐ Appellant will suffer irreparable harm absent a stay
☐ The stay will not harm other parties or the public interest
☐ The balance of equities favors a stay

10.4 Specific harm if Decision is enforced: [________________________________]

XI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Appellant respectfully prays that this Court:

A. Sustain this Appeal;

B. Reverse the Agency's Decision;

C. In the alternative, modify the Decision;

D. In the alternative, remand the case to the Agency with specific instructions;

E. Grant a stay of enforcement pending appeal pursuant to C.G.S. § 4-183(f);

F. Award Appellant costs and attorney fees as permitted by law;

G. Grant such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

XII. VERIFICATION

I, [________________________________], am the [________________________________] of Appellant. I have read the foregoing Appeal and the matters stated therein are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

Executed on [__/__/____], at [________________________________], Connecticut.

___________________________________
[________________________________]
[Title]

XIII. SIGNATURE BLOCK

Respectfully submitted,

[________________________________]
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant

By: ___________________________________

[________________________________], Esq.
Connecticut Bar No. [________________________________]
Address: [________________________________]
City, State, ZIP: [________________________________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]

Dated: [__/__/____]

XIV. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on [__/__/____], a true and correct copy of this Appeal was served on:

Respondent Agency:
[________________________________]
[Address]
Method: State marshal service; marshal and return: [________________________________]

Alternative place to serve the Agency (if used):
Office of the Attorney General
165 Capitol Avenue
Hartford, CT 06106
Method: State marshal service; marshal and return: [________________________________]

Under the 2026 supplement to C.G.S. § 4-183(c), a state marshal serves the appeal on the Agency at its office or at the Attorney General's Hartford office, and on each party listed in the final decision within the applicable 45-day appeal window. File a service affidavit or the marshal's return within 15 days after filing the appeal under § 4-183(d).

Other Parties (if any):
[________________________________]
Method: State marshal service; marshal and return: [________________________________]

___________________________________
[Attorney Name]

CONNECTICUT-SPECIFIC PROCEDURAL NOTES

• The appeal generally must be filed within 45 days after the applicable mailing, personal delivery, or reconsideration event identified in C.G.S. § 4-183(c). Use the later statutory trigger when more than one applies. The filing deadline is jurisdictional.
• Have a state marshal serve the appeal on the agency at its office or at the Attorney General's Hartford office, and on each party listed in the final decision, within the applicable 45-day window. File a service affidavit or the marshal's return within 15 days after filing. C.G.S. § 4-183(c)–(d) (2026 supplement).
• The agency must transmit the administrative record within 30 days after service of the appeal, unless the court allows more time. C.G.S. § 4-183(g).
• Review is conducted without a jury on the basis of the agency record.
• The "clearly erroneous" standard applies to factual findings under C.G.S. § 4-183(j)(5).
• Questions of law are reviewed de novo.
• Aggrievement (a specific, personal, and legal interest adversely affected) is a jurisdictional prerequisite.
• Practice Book § 14-7 et seq. governs the procedural aspects of administrative appeals.
• A stay may be requested from the agency or the court under C.G.S. § 4-183(f).

SOURCES AND REFERENCES

1. Connecticut Uniform Administrative Procedure Act, C.G.S. § 4-166 et seq.
2. C.G.S. § 4-177 - Contested cases
3. C.G.S. § 4-183 - Appeal to Superior Court
4. C.G.S. § 4-183(c) - 45-day jurisdictional filing deadline; service requirements
5. C.G.S. § 4-183(f) - Stay of agency decision pending appeal
6. C.G.S. § 4-183(g) - Agency record transmission (30 days)
7. C.G.S. § 4-183(j) - Six grounds for reversal (clearly erroneous; arbitrary/capricious; etc.)
8. Connecticut Practice Book § 14-7 et seq. - Administrative appeals procedure
9. Glastonbury Volunteer Ambulance Ass'n v. FOIC, 227 Conn. 848 (1993) - 45-day deadline is jurisdictional
10. Dolgner v. Alander, 237 Conn. 272 (1996) - substantial-evidence rule for agency fact-finding
11. Dept. of Public Safety v. FOIC, 298 Conn. 703 (2010) - Plenary review of legal questions

This template is designed for use in the State of Connecticut under the UAPA, C.G.S. § 4-183. The 45-day filing deadline is jurisdictional and strictly enforced. This template should be customized and reviewed by a qualified Connecticut attorney before filing. Laws and regulations may change; verify all citations before use.