SECURITIES MEDIATION BRIEF
FINRA Dispute Resolution Services
CASE INFORMATION
FINRA Case Number: _________________________
Mediation Date: _________________________
Mediation Location: _________________________
☐ In-Person ☐ Telephonic ☐ Video Conference
Mediator Name: _________________________
I. PARTIES
A. Claimant
Name: _________________________
Address:
_________________________
_________________________
Telephone: _________________________ Email: _________________________
Counsel for Claimant:
Attorney Name: _________________________
Firm Name: _________________________
Address:
_________________________
_________________________
Telephone: _________________________ Email: _________________________
B. Respondent(s)
Respondent 1 (Brokerage Firm)
Firm Name: _________________________
CRD Number: _________________________
Contact Person: _________________________
Counsel for Respondent 1:
Attorney Name: _________________________
Firm Name: _________________________
Telephone: _________________________ Email: _________________________
Respondent 2 (Individual Broker)
Name: _________________________
CRD Number: _________________________
Counsel for Respondent 2:
Attorney Name: _________________________
Firm Name: _________________________
Telephone: _________________________ Email: _________________________
II. NATURE OF THE DISPUTE
A. Summary of Claims
[Provide a concise summary of the claims being mediated]
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
B. Causes of Action
☐ Breach of Fiduciary Duty
☐ Negligence
☐ Unsuitability (FINRA Rule 2111)
☐ Churning/Excessive Trading
☐ Misrepresentation
☐ Omission of Material Facts
☐ Fraud (Rule 10b-5)
☐ Unauthorized Trading
☐ Failure to Supervise
☐ Breach of Contract
☐ Margin Account Violations
☐ Other: _________________________
C. Amount in Controversy
Damages Claimed: $______________
Breakdown:
| Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| Direct Investment Losses | $______________ |
| Commissions/Fees | $______________ |
| Interest | $______________ |
| Lost Opportunity | $______________ |
| Other | $______________ |
| TOTAL | $______________ |
III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. The Parties
Claimant's Background:
Age: _______ Occupation: _________________________
Investment Experience: _________________________
Investment Objectives: _________________________
Risk Tolerance: _________________________
Financial Situation at Time of Account Opening:
- Annual Income: $______________
- Liquid Net Worth: $______________
- Total Net Worth: $______________
Respondent's Background:
Broker's Years of Experience: _______
Broker's CRD Record (relevant disclosures): _________________________
Firm's Supervisory Structure: _________________________
B. The Account Relationship
Account Information:
Account Number: _________________________
Account Type: _________________________
Date Opened: _____________
Date Closed/Transferred: _____________
Initial Investment: $______________
C. Chronology of Key Events
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| _____________ | Account opened |
| _____________ | _________________________________ |
| _____________ | _________________________________ |
| _____________ | _________________________________ |
| _____________ | _________________________________ |
| _____________ | _________________________________ |
| _____________ | Discovery of issues |
| _____________ | Complaint to firm |
| _____________ | Filing of arbitration/mediation |
D. Detailed Factual Narrative
[Provide a detailed narrative of the facts from Claimant's perspective]
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
IV. LEGAL ANALYSIS
A. Applicable Legal Standards
1. FINRA Rule 2111 - Suitability
FINRA Rule 2111 requires that a broker have a reasonable basis to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy is suitable for the customer based on the customer's investment profile.
Three Components of Suitability:
-
Reasonable-Basis Suitability: The broker must have a reasonable basis to believe the recommendation is suitable for at least some investors.
-
Customer-Specific Suitability: The broker must have a reasonable basis to believe the recommendation is suitable for this particular customer based on the customer's investment profile.
-
Quantitative Suitability: A series of recommended transactions, even if suitable when viewed in isolation, must not be excessive when viewed in the aggregate.
Application to This Case:
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
2. Breach of Fiduciary Duty
A broker owes fiduciary duties to customers, including the duty of loyalty and the duty of care.
Application to This Case:
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
3. Negligence
A broker must exercise the degree of care that a reasonably prudent securities professional would exercise under similar circumstances.
Application to This Case:
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
4. [Other Applicable Legal Theories]
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
B. Key Legal Issues
Issue 1: _______________________________________________________________________
Analysis: _________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Issue 2: _______________________________________________________________________
Analysis: _________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Issue 3: _______________________________________________________________________
Analysis: _________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
V. DAMAGES ANALYSIS
A. Methodology
[Explain the methodology used to calculate damages]
☐ Out-of-Pocket Loss
☐ Well-Managed Account Analysis
☐ Market-Adjusted Damages
☐ Rescission
☐ Other: _________________________
B. Detailed Calculation
Out-of-Pocket Calculation:
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Total Deposits/Investments | $______________ |
| Less: Withdrawals | ($______________) |
| Less: Current/Final Account Value | ($______________) |
| Net Loss | $______________ |
Alternative Calculation - Well-Managed Account:
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Beginning Account Value | $______________ |
| Expected Return (______% annually) | $______________ |
| Projected Value | $______________ |
| Less: Actual Value | ($______________) |
| Damages | $______________ |
C. Supporting Documentation
☐ Expert report attached
☐ Trading analysis attached
☐ Account statements attached
☐ Damage calculation spreadsheet attached
VI. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
A. Claimant's Case Strengths
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
B. Claimant's Case Weaknesses/Challenges
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
C. Respondent's Likely Defenses
-
Defense: _________________________
Response: _________________________ -
Defense: _________________________
Response: _________________________ -
Defense: _________________________
Response: _________________________
VII. SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
A. Claimant's Settlement Position
Initial Demand: $______________
Current Settlement Range: $______________ to $______________
Minimum Acceptable Settlement: $______________ (CONFIDENTIAL - Do not share with opposing party)
B. Factors Favoring Settlement
For Claimant:
1. _________________________________________________________________________________
2. _________________________________________________________________________________
3. _________________________________________________________________________________
For Respondent:
1. _________________________________________________________________________________
2. _________________________________________________________________________________
3. _________________________________________________________________________________
C. Costs of Continued Litigation
Estimated Costs to Arbitration:
| Category | Estimated Cost |
|---|---|
| Attorney Fees | $______________ |
| Expert Witness Fees | $______________ |
| Forum Fees | $______________ |
| Discovery Costs | $______________ |
| Hearing Preparation | $______________ |
| TOTAL | $______________ |
Time to Hearing: _______ months
D. Risk Assessment
Likelihood of Prevailing at Arbitration: ______%
Expected Award Range if Successful: $______________ to $______________
Expected Value (probability-weighted): $______________
VIII. COMPARABLE CASES AND AWARDS
A. Similar FINRA Awards
Case 1:
Case Number: _________________________
Facts: _______________________________________________________________________
Award: $______________
Relevance: _________________________________________________________________
Case 2:
Case Number: _________________________
Facts: _______________________________________________________________________
Award: $______________
Relevance: _________________________________________________________________
Case 3:
Case Number: _________________________
Facts: _______________________________________________________________________
Award: $______________
Relevance: _________________________________________________________________
B. Settlement Range Analysis
Based on comparable cases and the specific facts of this matter, a reasonable settlement range is:
Low: $______________
Mid-Point: $______________
High: $______________
IX. ISSUES FOR MEDIATION
A. Key Issues to Address
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
B. Non-Monetary Terms
☐ Confidentiality Agreement
☐ Non-Disparagement Clause
☐ Release of All Claims
☐ No Admission of Liability
☐ Expungement Considerations (if applicable)
☐ Other: _________________________
C. Authority to Settle
Claimant's Authority:
☐ Claimant has full authority to settle
☐ Claimant requires consultation with [spouse/family/other]
☐ Limited authority: _________________________
Respondent's Authority:
☐ Representative has full settlement authority
☐ Representative has limited authority: $_____________
☐ Authority to be confirmed
X. PROPOSED SETTLEMENT TERMS
A. Monetary Terms
Settlement Amount: $______________
Payment Terms:
☐ Lump sum payment within _______ days
☐ Structured payment: _________________________
B. Non-Monetary Terms
Confidentiality:
_________________________________________________________________________________
Release:
_________________________________________________________________________________
Other Terms:
_________________________________________________________________________________
XI. CONCLUSION
A. Summary of Position
[Provide a compelling summary of why Claimant should prevail and why settlement is appropriate]
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
B. Request to Mediator
Claimant respectfully requests that the mediator assist the parties in reaching a resolution that:
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
-
_________________________________________________________________________________
XII. DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED
☐ Statement of Claim
☐ Respondent's Answer
☐ Account Opening Documents
☐ Account Statements
☐ Trade Confirmations
☐ Correspondence
☐ Expert Report
☐ Damages Calculation
☐ Comparable Awards Summary
☐ Other: _________________________
Respectfully Submitted,
Date: _________________________
Signature: _________________________
Print Name: _________________________
Firm: _________________________
Counsel for Claimant
STATE-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS
California
- California Corporations Code Section 25501 provides for civil liability in securities transactions
- California Civil Code Sections 1709-1710 (fraud/deceit) may support claims
- California Evidence Code Section 1119 protects mediation confidentiality
- Consider mentioning California-specific precedents if applicable
Texas
- Texas Securities Act Article 581-33 provides civil remedies
- Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 154 governs mediation
- Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act may provide additional leverage
- Mediation communications privileged under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Section 154.073
Florida
- Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act (Chapter 517) applies
- Florida Statutes Section 44.405 protects mediation confidentiality
- Florida's elderly investor protections may strengthen claims
- Consider mentioning Florida-specific precedents if applicable
New York
- Martin Act (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law Article 23-A) provides broad anti-fraud authority
- CPLR Article 75 governs arbitration-related matters
- New York mediation confidentiality protections
- New York common law fiduciary duty standards may be favorable
MEDIATION PREPARATION CHECKLIST
Before Mediation:
☐ Review all relevant documents thoroughly
☐ Prepare chronology of events
☐ Calculate damages using multiple methodologies
☐ Research comparable FINRA awards
☐ Assess strengths and weaknesses objectively
☐ Determine settlement authority and range
☐ Prepare opening statement
☐ Anticipate Respondent's arguments
☐ Prepare responses to expected defenses
☐ Organize documents for easy reference
☐ Confirm attendance of all necessary parties
☐ Confirm settlement authority of Respondent
During Mediation:
☐ Listen actively to opposing party's position
☐ Be prepared to adjust positions based on new information
☐ Focus on interests, not just positions
☐ Use mediator effectively as neutral facilitator
☐ Be patient - mediation takes time
☐ Document any agreements reached
After Mediation:
☐ If settled: Ensure written settlement agreement is signed
☐ If not settled: Assess what was learned for arbitration
☐ Follow up on any action items
☐ Maintain mediation confidentiality
FINRA MEDIATION OVERVIEW
About FINRA Mediation
- Voluntary: Both parties must agree to mediate
- Non-Binding: Until settlement agreement is signed
- Confidential: Discussions cannot be used in arbitration
- High Success Rate: Approximately 80% of mediations result in settlement
- Flexible: Can occur before, during, or instead of arbitration
Benefits of Mediation
- Cost Savings: Significantly less expensive than full arbitration
- Time Savings: Can be scheduled quickly; typically one day
- Control: Parties control the outcome (vs. arbitrator decision)
- Preserve Relationships: Less adversarial than arbitration
- Confidential: Settlement terms remain private
- Creative Solutions: More flexibility in crafting resolution
Mediator's Role
- Facilitate communication between parties
- Help identify issues and interests
- Assist in generating options
- Reality-test positions
- NO authority to impose a solution
This template is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Securities mediation involves complex legal and factual issues. Mediation briefs are typically confidential and should be prepared with the assistance of qualified counsel. Consult a securities attorney before participating in FINRA mediation.
Do more with Ezel
This free template is just the beginning. See how Ezel helps legal teams draft, research, and collaborate faster.
AI that drafts while you watch
Tell the AI what you need and watch your document transform in real-time. No more copy-pasting between tools or manually formatting changes.
- Natural language commands: "Add a force majeure clause"
- Context-aware suggestions based on document type
- Real-time streaming shows edits as they happen
- Milestone tracking and version comparison
Research and draft in one conversation
Ask questions, attach documents, and get answers grounded in case law. Link chats to matters so the AI remembers your context.
- Pull statutes, case law, and secondary sources
- Attach and analyze contracts mid-conversation
- Link chats to matters for automatic context
- Your data never trains AI models
Search like you think
Describe your legal question in plain English. Filter by jurisdiction, date, and court level. Read full opinions without leaving Ezel.
- All 50 states plus federal courts
- Natural language queries - no boolean syntax
- Citation analysis and network exploration
- Copy quotes with automatic citation generation
Ready to transform your legal workflow?
Join legal teams using Ezel to draft documents, research case law, and organize matters — all in one workspace.