Protective Order Template
United States District Court for the [District] of [State]
Case No.: [Number]
[Plaintiff],
Plaintiff,
v.
[Defendant],
Defendant.
Stipulated Protective Order
The Court finds good cause to enter this Protective Order to facilitate the exchange of confidential information during discovery. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Definitions
- "Protected Material" includes documents, testimony, or information designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY" (AEO).
- "Producing Party" and "Receiving Party" refer to parties or non-parties exchanging discovery.
2. Scope
- Applies to all Protected Material regardless of medium. Does not restrict information lawfully obtained outside discovery or publicly available.
3. Designation of Protected Material
- Producing Party may designate material by stamping or marking "CONFIDENTIAL"/"AEO" or by written notice referencing Bates numbers.
- Deposition testimony may be designated on the record or within [Number] days after transcript receipt.
4. Challenge to Designations
- Receiving Party may challenge designations by written notice. Parties must confer in good faith; if unresolved, the challenging party may seek Court intervention. Burden remains on Producing Party to justify designation.
5. Use of Protected Material
- Protected Material used solely for this litigation and not for other purposes.
- CONFIDENTIAL material may be disclosed to parties, counsel, experts, court personnel, and others as specified.
- AEO material limited to outside counsel, experts, and individuals approved by Producing Party or Court.
6. Disclosure Requirements
- Prior to sharing Protected Material with experts or consultants, Receiving Party must obtain written acknowledgment (Exhibit A) agreeing to be bound.
7. Filing Under Seal
- If Protected Material must be filed, party shall follow Local Rule [Rule] for sealing. Public filing permitted only after applying appropriate redactions or obtaining Court approval.
8. Inadvertent Disclosure
- Inadvertent failure to designate does not waive protection; Producing Party must promptly correct designations.
- Inadvertent production of privileged material governed by Fed. R. Evid. 502(d); Receiving Party shall return or destroy upon notice.
9. Non-Party Requests
- If Receiving Party receives subpoena or order seeking Protected Material, it shall notify Producing Party promptly to allow intervention.
10. Final Disposition
- Within [Number] days after final disposition, Receiving Party shall return or destroy Protected Material, certifying compliance. Counsel may retain archival copies of filings and work product.
11. Modification
- Parties may stipulate to modifications; Court retains authority to amend this Order.
12. Jurisdiction
- Court retains jurisdiction to enforce obligations after termination of litigation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: __________
__________________________________
[Judge Name]
United States [District/Magistrate] Judge
Exhibit A – Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound
I, __________________________, have read the Protective Order entered in [Case Name], agree to be bound by its terms, and submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for enforcement.
Signature: __________________________ Date: __________
Do more with Ezel
This free template is just the beginning. See how Ezel helps legal teams draft, research, and collaborate faster.
AI that drafts while you watch
Tell the AI what you need and watch your document transform in real-time. No more copy-pasting between tools or manually formatting changes.
- Natural language commands: "Add a force majeure clause"
- Context-aware suggestions based on document type
- Real-time streaming shows edits as they happen
- Milestone tracking and version comparison
Research and draft in one conversation
Ask questions, attach documents, and get answers grounded in case law. Link chats to matters so the AI remembers your context.
- Pull statutes, case law, and secondary sources
- Attach and analyze contracts mid-conversation
- Link chats to matters for automatic context
- Your data never trains AI models
Search like you think
Describe your legal question in plain English. Filter by jurisdiction, date, and court level. Read full opinions without leaving Ezel.
- All 50 states plus federal courts
- Natural language queries - no boolean syntax
- Citation analysis and network exploration
- Copy quotes with automatic citation generation
Ready to transform your legal workflow?
Join legal teams using Ezel to draft documents, research case law, and organize matters — all in one workspace.