DEMAND FOR SETTLEMENT - PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
STATE OF INDIANA
[FIRM NAME]
Attorneys at Law
[Street Address]
[City, Indiana ZIP]
Telephone: [Phone]
Facsimile: [Fax]
Email: [Email]
Licensed in the State of Indiana
DATE: [Date]
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
AND FIRST-CLASS MAIL
[Professional's Name or Firm]
[Professional Liability Insurance Carrier]
[Street Address]
[City, State ZIP]
RE: PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE CLAIM - SETTLEMENT DEMAND
Claimant: [Client Full Name]
Date(s) of Negligent Services: [Date or Date Range]
Professional(s): [Professional Name(s)]
Type of Professional: [Attorney/CPA/Architect/Engineer]
Claim Number: [If assigned]
Dear [Recipient Name]:
This firm represents [Client Name] in connection with the professional malpractice committed by [Professional Name] during the provision of [legal/accounting/architectural/engineering] services. This letter constitutes formal notice of our client's claim and our demand for settlement.
I. INDIANA-SPECIFIC LEGAL FRAMEWORK
A. Governing Law
This claim is governed by Indiana common law principles of professional negligence and the Indiana Code.
B. Statute of Limitations
Professional Malpractice: Under Ind. Code Section 34-11-2-4, an action for injury to person or property, including professional malpractice, must be brought within two (2) years from the date the cause of action accrues.
Discovery Rule: Indiana applies the discovery rule. The limitations period begins when the plaintiff knows, or in the exercise of ordinary diligence could have discovered, the alleged malpractice. Granger v. Boulard, 928 N.E.2d 569 (Ind. 2010).
Continuous Representation: The statute may be tolled during the professional's continuing representation of the client on the same matter.
Design Professionals - Statute of Repose: Under Ind. Code Section 32-30-1-5, claims against architects, engineers, and surveyors for defective design or construction must be brought within 10 years after substantial completion.
Relevant Dates in This Matter:
- Date(s) of negligent services: [Date(s)]
- Date of discovery: [Date]
- Two-year limitations period expires: [Date]
C. Comparative Fault
Indiana follows modified comparative fault (50% bar) under Ind. Code Section 34-51-2-6. A plaintiff is barred from recovery if the plaintiff's fault is greater than 50% of the total fault. If 50% or less, recovery is reduced proportionally.
Our investigation establishes that our client bears no fault for the damages caused by the defendant's professional negligence.
D. Standard of Care Under Indiana Law
Under Indiana law, a professional must exercise that degree of care, skill, and proficiency exercised by reasonably careful, skillful, and prudent practitioners in the same field in Indiana.
Attorney Standard: An attorney must exercise the skill and knowledge normally possessed by members of the legal profession in good standing. Biomet, Inc. v. Barnes & Thornburg, 888 N.E.2d 194 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
Accountant Standard: An accountant must exercise the degree of skill and care that a reasonably competent CPA would exercise under similar circumstances.
Architect/Engineer Standard: Design professionals must exercise the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of their profession. Irmscher & Assocs., Inc. v. C.I.P., Inc., 531 N.E.2d 1196 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988).
E. Expert Witness Requirements
Expert testimony is required to establish the standard of care and breach in professional malpractice cases unless the negligence is obvious to a layperson. Biomet, Inc. v. Barnes & Thornburg, 888 N.E.2d 194 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
Certification: We have retained a qualified expert who has reviewed the relevant materials and concluded that the applicable standard of care was breached.
F. Damage Caps
Indiana does not impose statutory caps on compensatory damages in professional malpractice cases.
Punitive Damages: Under Ind. Code Section 34-51-3-4, punitive damages are capped at the greater of three times compensatory damages or $50,000.
II. PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE - LITIGATION HOLD
YOU ARE HEREBY DIRECTED TO PRESERVE ALL EVIDENCE relating to the professional services provided to [Client Name], including but not limited to:
- Complete client files (paper and electronic)
- All drafts and working papers
- Correspondence (including emails, texts, and messages)
- Engagement letters and fee agreements
- Time records and billing statements
- Internal memoranda and notes
- Professional liability insurance policies
- [For Attorneys:] Case files, pleadings, research memoranda
- [For Accountants:] Work papers, tax returns, financial statements
- [For Architects/Engineers:] Drawings, specifications, calculations, project files
Modification, destruction, or concealment of any records will result in claims for spoliation and sanctions.
III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. Professional Engagement
[Client Name] engaged [Professional Name/Firm] on or about [Date] to provide [type of professional services]:
Scope of Engagement:
- [Describe the scope of professional services]
- [Objectives or goals of the engagement]
Professional Relationship:
- Engagement date: [Date]
- [If applicable:] Termination date: [Date]
- Fee arrangement: [Hourly/Fixed/Contingency]
B. Chronology of Events
[Date]: [Describe what occurred]
[Date]: [Describe what occurred]
C. The Professional Error(s)
[Describe specifically what the professional(s) did wrong]
D. Discovery of Malpractice
Our client [did not discover / could not have reasonably discovered] the malpractice until [Date], when [describe discovery circumstances].
IV. ELEMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE
Under Indiana law, a plaintiff must establish:
A. Duty (Professional Relationship)
[Professional Name] owed a duty of care to [Client Name] arising from the professional relationship established on [Date].
B. Breach of the Standard of Care
Applicable Standard: [Professional Name] was required to exercise that degree of care, skill, and proficiency exercised by reasonably careful practitioners in the same field.
Based on our expert's analysis, the applicable standard of care required [Professional] to:
- [Standard 1]
- [Standard 2]
- [Standard 3]
Breaches:
Breach 1: [Detailed description]
Breach 2: [Detailed description]
C. Causation
Proximate Cause: But for [Professional Name]'s breach of the standard of care, [Client Name] would not have suffered the damages described herein.
Legal Malpractice - Case Within a Case: [If applicable:] Had [Attorney Name] properly handled the matter, our client would have [obtained a favorable judgment / avoided liability]. Biomet, Inc. v. Barnes & Thornburg, 888 N.E.2d 194 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008).
D. Damages
As a direct and proximate result of the malpractice, [Client Name] has suffered the damages set forth below.
V. EXPERT OPINION
We have retained [Expert Name], a [licensed attorney/CPA/architect/licensed professional engineer] with [number] years of experience. [Expert Name] has concluded that:
- [Professional Name] breached the applicable standard of care;
- These breaches were a proximate cause of [Client Name]'s damages; and
- Had appropriate professional services been rendered, [describe avoided outcome].
VI. DAMAGES
A. Direct Financial Losses
| Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| [Description of loss 1] | $[Amount] |
| [Description of loss 2] | $[Amount] |
| TOTAL DIRECT LOSSES | $[Total] |
B. Consequential Damages
| Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| [Lost business opportunity] | $[Amount] |
| [Additional professional fees] | $[Amount] |
| TOTAL CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES | $[Total] |
C. Summary of Damages
| Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| Direct Financial Losses | $[Amount] |
| Consequential Damages | $[Amount] |
| TOTAL DAMAGES | $[Grand Total] |
VII. SETTLEMENT DEMAND
Based upon the clear breach of the standard of care and the substantial damages incurred, we hereby demand:
$[DEMAND AMOUNT]
This demand will remain open for thirty (30) days from the date of this letter, expiring at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on [Expiration Date].
VIII. INSURANCE INFORMATION REQUEST
Please provide within ten (10) days:
- All professional liability insurance policies applicable to this claim
- Policy limits for each applicable policy
- Any deductible or self-insured retention amounts
IX. DOCUMENTATION ENCLOSED
- Engagement letter and correspondence
- Documents evidencing the professional's work
- Documents evidencing damages
- Expert curriculum vitae
X. CONCLUSION
This case presents clear professional malpractice that caused significant financial harm to our client. We are prepared to litigate this matter through trial in the Indiana Circuit or Superior Court if necessary.
Please respond by the deadline stated above.
Respectfully submitted,
[FIRM NAME]
By: _________________________________
[Attorney Name]
Indiana Attorney No. [Number]
Attorney for [Client Name]
ENCLOSURES: As noted above
cc: [Client Name]
File
INDIANA PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE PRACTICE NOTES
-
Modified Comparative Fault (50% Bar): Plaintiff barred if fault is greater than 50%.
-
No Certificate of Merit: Indiana does not require a certificate of merit before filing.
-
Two-Year Limitations Period: Under Ind. Code Section 34-11-2-4.
-
Discovery Rule Applies: Limitations period runs from discovery of the injury.
-
Design Professional Repose: 10-year statute of repose under Ind. Code Section 32-30-1-5.
-
Expert Testimony Required: Essential for establishing standard of care.
-
Case Within a Case: In legal malpractice, must prove the underlying case would have been successful and collectible.
-
Punitive Damages Cap: Greater of 3x compensatory or $50,000.
-
Venue: Proper in county where defendant resides or where cause of action accrued.
This template is specific to Indiana law. Always verify current law and consult with qualified Indiana counsel.