Personal Injury Complaint - Slip and Fall - District of Columbia
COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE – PREMISES LIABILITY
(Slip-and-Fall/Trip-and-Fall Personal Injury Action — Superior Court of the District of Columbia)
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| [PLAINTIFF FULL LEGAL NAME], | Plaintiff, |
| v. | Civil Action No.: ____________ |
| [DEFENDANT FULL LEGAL NAME], | Defendant. |
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA — CIVIL DIVISION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- Count I – Negligence (Premises Liability)
- Damages
- Prayer for Relief
- Jury Demand
- Certification & Signature Block
- Verification (Optional)
1. PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF FULL LEGAL NAME] (“Plaintiff”) is an individual resident of [COUNTY/STATE OF RESIDENCE] and, at all relevant times, was lawfully present on the premises described herein.
-
Defendant [DEFENDANT FULL LEGAL NAME] (“Defendant”) is a [corporation/limited liability company/individual/other] organized under the laws of [STATE OF FORMATION] with its principal place of business at [ADDRESS], and is the owner, lessee, operator, manager, and/or controller of the premises located at [PREMISES ADDRESS] (the “Premises”).
a. [If applicable] Defendant's registered agent is [REGISTERED AGENT NAME & ADDRESS].
b. [If Defendant is the District of Columbia, state the date and manner of written notice to the Mayor under D.C. Code § 12-309(a), ordinarily due within six months after the injury, and the approximate time, place, cause, and circumstances stated in the notice: DETAILS.]
2. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under D.C. Code § 11-921(a), subject to the exceptions in subsection (b).
-
The events giving rise to this action occurred at [PREMISES ADDRESS] in the District of Columbia.
-
Personal jurisdiction over Defendant exists under D.C. Code § 13-423(a) because this claim arises from Defendant's [TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS IN THE DISTRICT UNDER (a)(1) / ACT OR OMISSION IN THE DISTRICT CAUSING INJURY THERE UNDER (a)(3) / INTEREST IN, USE OF, OR POSSESSION OF DISTRICT REAL PROPERTY UNDER (a)(5)].
3. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
-
On or about [DATE OF INCIDENT] at approximately [TIME], Plaintiff was lawfully present on the Premises for the purpose of [PURPOSE, e.g., shopping, visiting, employment].
-
At the aforesaid time and place, Plaintiff encountered a dangerous and hazardous condition, namely [DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF HAZARD, e.g., “an accumulation of water on the tiled floor near the entryway,” “a raised, broken concrete slab,” etc.] (the “Hazardous Condition”).
-
The Hazardous Condition was not open and obvious to a reasonable person exercising ordinary perception and caution under the circumstances.
-
Defendant, through its agents, servants, and/or employees, knew or, by the exercise of reasonable care, should have known of the Hazardous Condition because:
a. [Actual Notice] Defendant’s employees had observed, created, or been informed about the condition; and/or
b. [Constructive Notice] The condition existed for such a period of time that Defendant, in the exercise of reasonable inspection and maintenance procedures, should have discovered and remedied it. -
Defendant failed to warn Plaintiff of the Hazardous Condition and failed to make the area reasonably safe, in violation of Defendant’s duty of reasonable care under the circumstances owed to persons lawfully on the Premises under District of Columbia premises-liability law.
-
As a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s negligence, Plaintiff slipped/tripped, fell, and sustained severe bodily injuries, including but not limited to [SPECIFY INJURIES, e.g., “fractured left ankle, torn ligaments, lumbar spine sprain”], resulting in pain, suffering, disability, medical expenses, and lost wages.
-
Plaintiff has incurred, and will continue to incur, medical and related expenses in an amount to be proven at trial, and has suffered loss of earnings and earning capacity.
4. COUNT I – NEGLIGENCE (PREMISES LIABILITY)
-
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 1 through 12 as though fully set forth herein.
-
Defendant, as owner, lessee, operator, manager, and/or controller of the Premises, owed Plaintiff, a lawful entrant, a duty of reasonable care under the circumstances. Defendant knew or reasonably should have known of the Hazardous Condition and failed to correct it or warn Plaintiff. Whiteru v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, No. 24-SP-0003 (D.C. Nov. 20, 2025).
-
Defendant breached its duty of care by, inter alia:
a. Failing to properly inspect and maintain the area where the Hazardous Condition existed;
b. Failing to remedy or cordon off the Hazardous Condition;
c. Failing to warn Plaintiff and others of the existence of the Hazardous Condition;
d. Failing to establish and enforce safety policies or procedures adequate to discover and correct such hazards; and
e. Otherwise acting with carelessness and negligence under the circumstances. -
Defendant’s breaches were the direct and proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injuries and damages.
-
As a result, Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial, including medical expenses (past and future), loss of earnings and earning capacity, pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, and other general damages.
Contributory Negligence Defense Notice
- Defendant may assert that Plaintiff was contributorily negligent. Plaintiff denies that any failure by Plaintiff to exercise reasonable care was a substantial factor in causing the alleged injury. Massengale v. Pitts, 737 A.2d 1029 (D.C. 1999).
5. DAMAGES
-
Plaintiff incorporates Paragraphs 1–18.
-
Special Damages (Economic):
a. Past medical expenses: $[AMOUNT]
b. Future medical expenses: $[AMOUNT]
c. Past lost wages: $[AMOUNT]
d. Future loss of earning capacity: $[AMOUNT]
e. Other out-of-pocket expenses: $[AMOUNT] -
General Damages (Non-Economic):
a. Pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life in an amount to be determined at trial.
6. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant as follows:
A. Compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
B. Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as permitted by law;
C. Costs of suit herein incurred;
D. Reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to any applicable statutory or contractual basis;
E. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
7. JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable, pursuant to Superior Court Rule of Civil Procedure 38.
8. CERTIFICATION & SIGNATURE BLOCK
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME] (D.C. Bar No. ________)
[LAW FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[TELEPHONE]
[EMAIL]
Counsel for Plaintiff
Dated: [DATE]
9. VERIFICATION (Optional; include only if required for this filing)
I, [PLAINTIFF NAME], being first duly sworn, depose and state that I am the Plaintiff in this action; I have read the foregoing Complaint and know the contents thereof; the same is true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
____________________________________
[PLAINTIFF NAME]
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day of __________, 20__.
____________________________________
Notary Public
My commission expires: __________
END OF TEMPLATE – PERSONAL INJURY COMPLAINT (D.C.)
About this template
- Last updated
- October 17, 2026
- Citations checked
- October 17, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- District of Columbia
- Category
- Personal Injury
Legal authority
- D.C. Code § 12-301(8) (3-year residual limitation where no other period is specially prescribed)
- D.C. Code § 11-921 (Superior Court civil subject-matter jurisdiction)
- D.C. Code § 13-423 (long-arm personal jurisdiction)
- D.C. Code § 12-309 (notice-of-claim requirement for suits against the District of Columbia)
- Whiteru v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, No. 24-SP-0003 (D.C. Nov. 20, 2025) (reasonable care for lawful entrants; distinct trespasser duties)
- Massengale v. Pitts, 737 A.2d 1029 (D.C. 1999) (contributory negligence requires a causal contribution to injury)
- D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 38(b) (jury demand)
- D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 4(c)(1) (service package)
- D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 4(m)(1)(A) (filing proof or acknowledgment within 60 days, subject to exceptions)
- D.C. Super. Ct. Civ. R. 11(a) (verification ordinarily not required)
Personal injury cases are brought by people who were hurt because of someone else's carelessness: car crashes, slip and falls, defective products, and more. Demand letters, settlement agreements, and court filings in these cases have to document the injuries, the medical treatment, the lost income, and the exact legal basis for holding the other side responsible. Well-prepared paperwork is what drives higher settlements and forces insurers to take the claim seriously.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
A reviewer verified this template's legal citations against the official source on October 17, 2026.
D.C. Code § 12-301(8) (checked October 17, 2026): "for which a limitation is not otherwise specially prescribed— 3 years"
D.C. Code § 11-921(a) (checked October 17, 2026): "Except as provided in subsection (b), the Superior Court has jurisdiction of any civil action or other matter (at law or in equity) brought in the District of Columbia."
D.C. Code § 13-423(a)(1) (checked October 17, 2026): "transacting any business in the District of Columbia;"
D.C. Code § 13-423(a)(3) (checked October 17, 2026): "causing tortious injury in the District of Columbia by an act or omission in the District of Columbia;"
Draft your Personal Injury Complaint - Slip and Fall in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.