Motion to Dismiss (Criminal) - North Dakota
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Introduction
- Statement of Facts
- Grounds for Dismissal
- Legal Argument
- Prayer for Relief
- Certificate of Service
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [________________________________]
[________________________________] JUDICIAL DISTRICT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
| STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, | Case No.: [________________________________] |
| Plaintiff, | |
| v. | |
| [DEFENDANT FULL LEGAL NAME], | |
| Defendant. |
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, [DEFENDANT FULL LEGAL NAME], by and through counsel, [ATTORNEY NAME], of [LAW FIRM NAME], hereby moves this Court for an order dismissing the ☐ Complaint / ☐ Information / ☐ Indictment filed in the above-captioned matter pursuant to N.D.R.Crim.P. 12 and/or N.D.R.Crim.P. 48. This motion is made on the grounds set forth below and supported by the accompanying memorandum, attached declaration(s), and all papers and records on file herein.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
On or about [__/__/____], Defendant was charged by way of ☐ Complaint / ☐ Information / ☐ Indictment with the following offense(s):
| Count | Charge | Statute | Alleged Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| [____] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [__/__/____] |
| [____] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [__/__/____] |
| [____] | [________________________________] | [________________________________] | [__/__/____] |
[Provide a concise factual summary of the relevant procedural history and facts giving rise to this motion.]
[________________________________]
III. GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL
Defendant seeks dismissal on the following grounds (check all that apply):
☐ A. Insufficient Evidence / Lack of Probable Cause
The evidence presented is insufficient to establish probable cause that a crime was committed and that Defendant committed it.
☐ B. Speedy Trial Violation (N.D. Const. Art. I, § 13; N.D.R.Crim.P. 48(b))
The State has failed to bring Defendant to trial within a reasonable time. There has been unnecessary delay in bringing Defendant to trial since [__/__/____].
☐ C. Statute of Limitations (N.D.C.C. § 29-04-01 et seq.)
The prosecution was commenced beyond the applicable statute of limitations. The charged offense carries a limitations period of [________________________________] and the alleged conduct occurred on or about [__/__/____].
☐ D. Double Jeopardy (U.S. Const. Amend. V; N.D. Const. Art. I, § 13)
Defendant has previously been placed in jeopardy for the same offense. The prior proceeding concluded on [__/__/____] in Case No. [________________________________].
☐ E. Due Process Violation (U.S. Const. Amend. XIV; N.D. Const. Art. I, § 12)
The prosecution's conduct has violated Defendant's due process rights, including but not limited to: [________________________________].
☐ F. Defective Charging Instrument (N.D.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3)(B))
The Information / Indictment / Complaint is fatally defective because: [________________________________].
☐ G. Prosecutorial Misconduct
The prosecution engaged in misconduct that prejudiced Defendant's rights, specifically: [________________________________].
IV. LEGAL ARGUMENT
A. Speedy Trial
Under both the Sixth Amendment and Article I, § 13 of the North Dakota Constitution, a criminal defendant has the right to a speedy trial. North Dakota applies the four-factor balancing test set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). State v. Moran, 2006 ND 62, 711 N.W.2d 915. Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 48(b), the court may dismiss for unnecessary delay in bringing a defendant to trial.
[________________________________]
B. Statute of Limitations
Under N.D.C.C. § 29-04-02, prosecution for a Class AA felony may be commenced at any time. For other offenses, the limitations period runs from the date of the offense. State v. Greenwood, 2001 ND 130, 632 N.W.2d 403.
[________________________________]
C. Double Jeopardy
The Double Jeopardy Clause protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal or conviction. North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969); State v. Hemmer, 2003 ND 125, 666 N.W.2d 439.
[________________________________]
D. Defective Charging Instrument
Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3)(B), a defendant may raise defects in the indictment or information before trial, including duplicity, multiplicity, lack of specificity, improper joinder, and failure to state an offense. State v. Brossart, 2015 ND 246, 870 N.W.2d 178.
[________________________________]
E. Additional Grounds
[________________________________]
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court:
- Dismiss all charges against Defendant with prejudice;
- Alternatively, dismiss all charges without prejudice;
- Order such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
Dated: [__/__/____]
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME], ND Bar No. [________________________________]
[LAW FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY], North Dakota [ZIP CODE]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
Attorney for Defendant [DEFENDANT FULL LEGAL NAME]
VI. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, [________________________________], hereby certify that on [__/__/____], I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS on the following parties by the method indicated:
☐ Personal delivery
☐ U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid
☐ Electronic service via [________________________________]
Office of the State's Attorney
[________________________________] County
[ADDRESS]
[CITY], North Dakota [ZIP CODE]
Dated: [__/__/____]
________________________________________
[NAME OF DECLARANT]
NORTH DAKOTA-SPECIFIC NOTES
- N.D.R.Crim.P. 12: All objections or defenses raised before trial must be made by motion to dismiss or motion to grant appropriate relief. Defects in the charging instrument, speedy trial violations, and double jeopardy must be raised before trial or they are waived.
- N.D.R.Crim.P. 48: Provides for dismissal by the prosecution (with court approval) or by the court for unnecessary delay.
- Speedy Trial: North Dakota has no statutory speedy trial time limit. The constitutional right is analyzed under the Barker v. Wingo balancing test.
- Statutes of Limitations (N.D.C.C. Ch. 29-04): No limit for Class AA felonies; other limitations vary by offense classification.
- Filing and Service: Motions must be served pursuant to N.D.R.Crim.P. 49, incorporating the methods of N.D.R.Civ.P. 5.
This template is provided by ezel.ai for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a licensed North Dakota attorney before use.
About this template
- Last updated
- September 24, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- North Dakota
- Category
- Criminal Law
Legal authority
- N.D.R.Crim.P. 12 (Pleadings and Pretrial Motions)
- N.D.R.Crim.P. 48 (Dismissal)
- N.D.C.C. § 29-01 et seq. (Criminal Procedure)
- N.D. Const. Art. I, § 12 (Due Process)
- N.D. Const. Art. I, § 13 (Rights of Accused)
Criminal law paperwork covers every stage of a criminal case, from the first appearance and bail motion through pretrial motions, plea agreements, sentencing, and appeals. Deadlines in criminal cases are short and often unforgiving, and constitutional rights can be waived just by missing a filing. Using the right motion at the right time can mean the difference between evidence getting suppressed, charges getting reduced, or a case getting dismissed entirely.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.
N.D.R.Crim.P. 12 amendment history (checked August 22, 2026): "Rule 12 was amended, effective January 1, 1980; September 1, 1983; January 1, 1995; March 1, 2006; March 1, 2016; July 1, 2026."
N.D.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(1)-(2) (checked August 22, 2026): "A party may raise by pretrial motion any defense, objection, or request that the court can determine without a trial on the merits. A motion that the court lacks jurisdiction may be made at any time while the case is pending."
N.D.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3)(A)-(B) (checked August 22, 2026): "The following defenses, objections and requests must be raised by pretrial motion if the basis for the motion is then reasonably available and the motion can be determined without a trial on the merits: a defect in instituting the prosecution, including improper venue, preindictment delay, a violation of the right to speedy trial, selective or vindictive prosecution, or an error in the grand-jury proceeding or preliminary hearing; and a defect in the indictment, information, or complaint, including duplicity, multiplicity, lack of specificity, improper joinder, or failure to state an offense."
N.D.R.Crim.P. 12(c) (checked August 22, 2026): "The court may, at the arraignment or as soon afterward as practicable, set a deadline for the parties to make pretrial motions and may also schedule a motion hearing. If the court does not set one, the deadline is the start of trial. If a party does not meet the deadline for making a Rule 12(b)(3) motion, the motion is untimely. But a court may consider the defense, objection, or request if the party shows good cause."
Draft your Motion to Dismiss (Criminal) in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.