COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
(Maryland “Lemon Law” – Md. Code Ann., Com. Law §§ 14-1501 et seq.)
[// GUIDANCE: This template is drafted for filing in a Maryland Circuit Court. Adapt caption, venue, and procedural rules if filing in District Court or another jurisdiction.]
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
I. DOCUMENT HEADER
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR [_] COUNTY, MARYLAND
Civil Action No.: _____
[PLAINTIFF NAME],
Plaintiff,
v.
[DEFENDANT MANUFACTURER NAME],
Serve: [Resident Agent / Registered Office Address]
Defendant.
COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF NAME] (“Plaintiff”), by counsel, brings this action against Defendant [DEFENDANT MANUFACTURER NAME] (“Defendant” or “Manufacturer”), and alleges as follows:
Effective Date of Filing: [DATE]
Governing Law: Maryland Automotive Warranty Enforcement Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law §§ 14-1501 et seq. (the “Act”) and other applicable Maryland law.
Forum: State court (per metadata).
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
II. DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this Complaint, the following capitalized terms have the meanings set forth below. Undefined capitalized terms take their ordinary meaning under Maryland law.
- “Act” means the Maryland Automotive Warranty Enforcement Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law §§ 14-1501 et seq.
- “Defect” means any nonconformity, condition, or malfunction that substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of the Motor Vehicle.
- “Express Warranty” means the written new-vehicle limited warranty issued by Manufacturer relating to the Motor Vehicle.
- “Motor Vehicle” means the [YEAR, MAKE, MODEL] bearing Vehicle Identification Number (“VIN”) [__], purchased by Plaintiff on [DATE OF PURCHASE].
- “Repair Attempts” means each instance in which the Motor Vehicle was presented to an authorized repair facility for correction of the Defect(s).
- “Vehicle Value Cap” means the statutory limit on recovery not to exceed the full purchase price of the Motor Vehicle, inclusive of collateral charges (see Act § 14-1502(c)).
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
III. OPERATIVE FACTS
- Purchase. On [DATE], Plaintiff purchased the Motor Vehicle from [DEALER NAME & ADDRESS] for a total purchase price of $[______], inclusive of taxes, fees, and collateral charges.
- Express Warranty. Manufacturer issued the Express Warranty covering the Motor Vehicle for [NUMBER] months/ [NUMBER] miles.
- Defects Manifested. Beginning on or about [DATE], the Motor Vehicle developed the following Defect(s): [DESCRIBE DEFECTS].
- Repair Attempts.
a. First Attempt: [DATE] – [DEALERSHIP] – [WORK ORDER #] – [DESCRIPTION].
b. Second Attempt: [DATE] – [DEALERSHIP] – [WORK ORDER #] – [DESCRIPTION].
c. Third Attempt: [DATE] – [DEALERSHIP] – [WORK ORDER #] – [DESCRIPTION].
d. Aggregate Days Out of Service: [NUMBER] days. - Notice to Manufacturer. Plaintiff provided written notice of the Defect(s) to Manufacturer on [DATE] pursuant to Act § 14-1502(e).
- Manufacturer’s Failure to Conform Vehicle. Despite the Repair Attempts, the Defect(s) persist and substantially impair the use, value, and safety of the Motor Vehicle.
- Compliance with Informal Dispute Procedure.
[CHOOSE ONE AND DELETE THE OTHER]
a. Certified Procedure Utilized: Plaintiff submitted the dispute to Manufacturer’s Attorney-General-certified informal dispute settlement procedure on [DATE]; decision issued on [DATE]; relief denied.
b. No Certified Procedure: Manufacturer did not maintain a certified informal dispute settlement procedure under Act § 14-1502(f); therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to file this action without resort to arbitration.
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. REPRESENTATIONS & WARRANTIES
- Defendant expressly warranted that the Motor Vehicle would be free from Defects and would conform to all material specifications during the warranty period.
- Plaintiff relied on the Express Warranty in purchasing the Motor Vehicle.
- Defendant breached the Express Warranty by failing to repair or replace the Motor Vehicle so that it conforms to the Express Warranty.
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
V. CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I – Violation of Maryland Automotive Warranty Enforcement Act
- Plaintiff realleges ¶¶ 1–10.
- The Motor Vehicle experienced Defect(s) subject to the Act within the first 24 months or 18,000 miles of operation (whichever first occurred).
- Defendant failed, after a reasonable number of attempts, to repair the Defect(s) or replace/refund the Motor Vehicle as mandated by Act § 14-1502(c).
- As a direct and proximate result, Plaintiff sustained damages up to the Vehicle Value Cap, plus incidental and consequential damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs as allowed by Act § 14-1504(b).
COUNT II – Breach of Express Warranty (Md. Code Ann., Com. Law § 2-313)
- Plaintiff realleges ¶¶ 1–10.
- The Express Warranty constituted an affirmation of fact and promise that became part of the basis of the bargain.
- Defendant’s failure to conform the Motor Vehicle to the Express Warranty constitutes a breach, causing Plaintiff to suffer damages in an amount to be proven at trial but not exceeding the Vehicle Value Cap.
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in Plaintiff’s favor and against Defendant as follows:
A. Order Defendant to accept return of the Motor Vehicle and, at Plaintiff’s election, either:
1. Replace the Motor Vehicle with a new, comparable vehicle; or
2. Refund the full purchase price, finance charges, taxes, fees, and other collateral costs;
B. Award incidental and consequential damages as permitted by law, provided that total monetary recovery shall not exceed the Vehicle Value Cap;
C. Award reasonable attorneys’ fees and litigation costs pursuant to Act § 14-1504(b);
D. Award pre- and post-judgment interest at the maximum rate allowable;
E. Grant such other and further relief, including injunctive or declaratory relief, as the Court deems just and proper.
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Pursuant to Article 23 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights and Md. Rule 2-325(a), Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
VIII. VERIFICATION
[// GUIDANCE: Maryland Rule 1-311 requires counsel signature; verification by Plaintiff is optional unless statute/rule demands. Lemon law complaints are typically not verified, but add if desired.]
I, [PLAINTIFF NAME], declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing facts are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
Date: __ _______
[PLAINTIFF NAME]
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
IX. SIGNATURE BLOCK
Respectfully submitted,
[ATTORNEY NAME] (Bar No. ______)
[LAW FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[PHONE] | [EMAIL]
Counsel for Plaintiff
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
X. OPTIONAL SCHEDULING ORDER PROPOSAL
[// GUIDANCE: Some Maryland circuits invite proposed scheduling orders with initial filings. Delete if not required.]
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECKLIST FOR FILING (Maryland State Court)
- Civil-Case Information Report (CCIR) completed and attached.
- Filing fee paid to Clerk of the Circuit Court.
- Summons prepared for issuance to Defendant’s resident agent.
- Exhibits attached:
• Purchase Agreement/Buyer’s Order
• Repair Orders (all)
• Notice Letter(s) to Manufacturer
• Arbitration Decision (if applicable) - Service of Process to be effected per Md. Rule 2-121.
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
[// GUIDANCE: This template is intended for attorney use and requires fact-specific customization. Double-check all statutory citations, repair dates, and numerical thresholds before filing.]