INSURANCE BAD FAITH DEMAND LETTER

State of Connecticut

[LAW FIRM LETTERHEAD]

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
SETTLEMENT COMMUNICATION - FOR RESOLUTION PURPOSES ONLY
PROTECTED UNDER CT RULES OF EVIDENCE AND F.R.E. 408

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
AND VIA EMAIL TO: [ADJUSTER_EMAIL]

Date: [DATE]

[INSURANCE_COMPANY_NAME]
[CLAIMS_DEPARTMENT_ADDRESS]
[CITY], [STATE] [ZIP]

Attention: [ADJUSTER_NAME], [ADJUSTER_TITLE]
Re: FORMAL BAD FAITH DEMAND - CONNECTICUT LAW
Insured: [INSURED_NAME]
Claimant: [CLAIMANT_NAME]
Policy Number: [POLICY_NUMBER]
Claim Number: [CLAIM_NUMBER]
Date of Loss: [DATE_OF_LOSS]
Policy Limits: [POLICY_LIMITS]
Response Deadline: [RESPONSE_DEADLINE] (This is a Time-Limited Demand)

Dear [ADJUSTER_NAME]:

I. INTRODUCTION AND NATURE OF DEMAND

This firm represents [CLIENT_NAME] ("our client") in connection with the above-referenced insurance claim arising under the laws of Connecticut. This letter constitutes a formal demand for payment of policy benefits wrongfully withheld and serves as notice of [INSURANCE_COMPANY_NAME]'s ("the Company" or "[CARRIER_SHORT_NAME]") bad faith conduct in handling our client's claim under Connecticut law.

As a seasoned insurance litigator with decades of experience representing policyholders against major carriers in Connecticut, I am well aware of the Company's obligations under Conn. Gen. Stat. Title 38a and Connecticut common law. The Company's conduct in this matter constitutes a textbook example of bad faith claims practices that Connecticut courts routinely punish with substantial damages.

This is a time-limited demand. The Company has until [RESPONSE_DEADLINE] to tender the full amount owed of $[DEMAND_AMOUNT] and resolve all claims arising from this loss. Failure to do so will result in immediate litigation seeking all available remedies under Connecticut law.

II. CONNECTICUT BAD FAITH LAW

A. Legal Standard

Connecticut does not recognize common law bad faith but permits claims under CUTPA (Conn. Gen. Stat. 42-110a et seq.) for unfair insurance practices defined in CUIPA (38a-815 et seq.). Must show unfair or deceptive act; single act may suffice for CUTPA claim. Mead v. Burns, 509 A.2d 11 (Conn. 1986).

B. Available Damages Under Connecticut Law

Under Connecticut law, our client is entitled to recover:

Actual damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees under CUTPA

C. Punitive Damages Standard

Reckless indifference to rights of others or intentional and wanton violation

D. Attorney's Fees

Recoverable under CUTPA (Conn. Gen. Stat. 42-110g)

III. POLICY INFORMATION AND COVERAGE

A. Policy Details

B. Coverage Analysis

The policy provides coverage for [DESCRIBE_COVERED_LOSS_TYPE]. The loss clearly falls within the policy's insuring agreement under Connecticut law interpretation principles.

[CARRIER_SHORT_NAME] has acknowledged coverage by [DESCRIBE_COVERAGE_ACKNOWLEDGMENT]. Having accepted coverage, the Company is obligated under Connecticut law to:

• Conduct a thorough, fair, and objective investigation
• Evaluate the claim in good faith
• Promptly pay all amounts owed under the policy
• Communicate honestly and transparently with the insured
• Avoid unreasonable delays in claim handling
• Refrain from compelling litigation through unreasonable conduct

IV. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND CLAIM HISTORY

A. The Underlying Loss

On [DATE_OF_LOSS], [DESCRIBE_LOSS_EVENT_IN_DETAIL].

[ADDITIONAL_LOSS_DETAILS]

B. Chronological Timeline of Bad Faith Conduct

V. SPECIFIC BAD FAITH CONDUCT

[CARRIER_SHORT_NAME]'s handling of this claim violates both the express and implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing recognized under Connecticut law:

A. Unreasonable Delay

The Company has unreasonably delayed the investigation, evaluation, and payment of this claim in violation of Connecticut law:

• [DESCRIBE_SPECIFIC_DELAY_1]
• [DESCRIBE_SPECIFIC_DELAY_2]
• [DESCRIBE_SPECIFIC_DELAY_3]

B. Inadequate Investigation

[CARRIER_SHORT_NAME] failed to conduct the thorough, fair, and objective investigation required under Connecticut law:

• [INVESTIGATION_FAILURE_1]
• [INVESTIGATION_FAILURE_2]
• [INVESTIGATION_FAILURE_3]

C. Unreasonable Settlement Offers

The Company's settlement offers have been grossly inadequate:

D. Misrepresentation of Policy Provisions

[DESCRIBE_MISREPRESENTATIONS]

E. Failure to Communicate

[DESCRIBE_COMMUNICATION_FAILURES]

VI. STATUTORY VIOLATIONS

A. Connecticut Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act

[CARRIER_SHORT_NAME]'s conduct violates Conn. Gen. Stat. 38a-815 et seq. (CUIPA), which prohibits:

• Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue
• Failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications with respect to claims
• Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims
• Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation
• Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair, and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear
• Compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due under an insurance policy by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered
• Attempting to settle a claim for less than the amount to which a reasonable person would have believed he or she was entitled
• Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation of the basis in the policy for denial or inadequate offer

B. Connecticut Prompt Payment Requirements

[CARRIER_SHORT_NAME] has violated Conn. Gen. Stat. 38a-816 - Unfair claims practices act by:

• [SPECIFIC_PROMPT_PAYMENT_VIOLATION_1]
• [SPECIFIC_PROMPT_PAYMENT_VIOLATION_2]
• [SPECIFIC_PROMPT_PAYMENT_VIOLATION_3]

VII. DAMAGES

A. Contract Damages

B. Consequential Damages

C. Emotional Distress Damages

[DESCRIBE_EMOTIONAL_DISTRESS_IF_RECOVERABLE_UNDER_CT_LAW]

D. Punitive/Exemplary Damages

Under Connecticut law, punitive damages require: Reckless indifference to rights of others or intentional and wanton violation

The Company's conduct meets this standard because [DESCRIBE_AGGRAVATING_FACTORS].

E. Statutory Penalties

Under Connecticut law, our client is entitled to:

[STATE_SPECIFIC_STATUTORY_PENALTIES]

VIII. DEMAND

Based on the foregoing, we hereby demand that [CARRIER_SHORT_NAME]:

A. Monetary Demand

Pay the total sum of $[TOTAL_DEMAND_AMOUNT] as follows:

B. Settlement Terms

In addition to the monetary payment:

• Full and complete release of all claims by [CARRIER_SHORT_NAME] against our client
• Confidentiality agreement regarding settlement terms (optional)
• Correction of any adverse information reported to industry databases

IX. TIME-LIMITED NATURE OF THIS DEMAND

THIS DEMAND EXPIRES AT 5:00 P.M. [TIME_ZONE] ON [RESPONSE_DEADLINE].

Consequences of Non-Response

If [CARRIER_SHORT_NAME] fails to accept this demand by the deadline:

1. Litigation will be filed immediately in Connecticut seeking all available remedies

2. This demand will be withdrawn and our client will seek:
   - Full policy benefits plus prejudgment interest
   - All consequential and emotional distress damages
   - Punitive damages without limitation
   - Attorney's fees and costs
   - All statutory penalties under Connecticut law

3. Regulatory complaints will be filed with:
   - Connecticut Insurance Department, P.O. Box 816, Hartford, CT 06142
   - National Association of Insurance Commissioners

X. DOCUMENT PRESERVATION NOTICE

This letter constitutes formal notice to preserve all documents and electronically stored information related to this claim, including but not limited to:

• The complete claim file, including all versions and drafts
• All internal communications regarding this claim
• All communications with the insured/claimant
• Adjuster notes, diaries, and activity logs
• All documents received from or sent to the insured/claimant
• All photographs, videos, and inspection reports
• All expert reports, estimates, and evaluations
• Claim handling guidelines, manuals, and procedures
• Training materials relevant to this type of claim
• Reserve information and reserve change documentation
• Supervisor notes and approvals
• Quality assurance or audit reports

XI. CONCLUSION

[CARRIER_SHORT_NAME]'s handling of this claim represents precisely the type of conduct that Connecticut bad faith laws were enacted to prevent and punish. We strongly encourage the Company to use this opportunity to resolve this matter fairly under Connecticut law.

Please direct all communications regarding this matter to the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,

[LAW_FIRM_NAME]

By: _______________________________
[ATTORNEY_NAME]
[BAR_NUMBER]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY], CT [ZIP]
[PHONE]
[FAX]
[EMAIL]

Counsel for [CLIENT_NAME]

ENCLOSURES:
- Policy declarations page
- Relevant policy provisions
- Claim correspondence chronology
- Damage documentation
- Expert reports (if applicable)

CC:
- [CLIENT_NAME]
- Connecticut Insurance Department, P.O. Box 816, Hartford, CT 06142 (via complaint filing)

CONNECTICUT LAW QUICK REFERENCE