Federal Motion to Remand Checklist
Federal Court: United States District Court for the [________________________________]
Federal Case Number: [________________________________]
Original State Court: [________________________________]
State Court Case Number: [________________________________]
Case Caption: [________________________________] v. [________________________________]
Moving Party: [________________________________]
Filing Attorney: [________________________________]
Date Prepared: [__/__/____]
I. Deadline Analysis
Critical Deadline Determination
☐ Date Notice of Removal filed: [__/__/____]
☐ 30-Day Deadline for Procedural Defects:
☐ Motion based on procedural defect must be filed within 30 days of removal
☐ 30-day deadline: [__/__/____]
☐ ☐ Within deadline ☐ Deadline passed
☐ No Time Limit for Jurisdictional Defects:
☐ Motion based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction may be filed at any time
☐ Court may remand sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction
II. Grounds for Remand
Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (No Time Limit)
☐ No Federal Question Jurisdiction:
☐ Complaint does not arise under federal law
☐ Federal question not on face of complaint
☐ Artful pleading does not create federal question
☐ Complete preemption does not apply
☐ No Diversity Jurisdiction:
☐ No complete diversity of citizenship
☐ Party citizenship analysis: [________________________________]
☐ Amount in controversy not met ($75,000 threshold)
☐ Actual amount in controversy: $[________________]
☐ Forum Defendant Rule (28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(2)):
☐ Diversity case
☐ Defendant is citizen of state where action filed
☐ Defendant was properly joined AND served at time of removal
☐ Forum defendant: [________________________________]
Procedural Defects (30-Day Deadline)
☐ Untimely Removal:
☐ Notice of Removal filed more than 30 days after service
☐ Date defendant served: [__/__/____]
☐ Date removal filed: [__/__/____]
☐ Days elapsed: [____]
☐ One-Year Bar (Diversity Cases):
☐ State court action filed: [__/__/____]
☐ Removal filed: [__/__/____]
☐ More than one year elapsed
☐ No bad faith by plaintiff to prevent removal
☐ Lack of Unanimous Consent:
☐ Not all defendants joined in or consented to removal
☐ Missing defendant: [________________________________]
☐ Consent was required (defendant properly served)
☐ Defective Notice of Removal:
☐ Required documents not attached
☐ Inadequate statement of grounds
☐ Improper venue for removal
☐ Other defect: [________________________________]
III. Motion to Remand - Contents
Motion Document
☐ Caption with case number
☐ Title: "Motion to Remand to State Court"
☐ Statement of grounds for remand
☐ Prayer for relief requesting remand to state court
☐ Request for costs and fees (if applicable)
☐ Signature block
Memorandum of Law in Support
☐ Statement of Facts
☐ Original state court filing
☐ Service on defendants
☐ Notice of Removal and timing
☐ Legal Argument
☐ Applicable legal standard
☐ Analysis of grounds for remand
☐ Burden of proof on removing party
☐ Conclusion
Supporting Evidence
☐ Declaration(s) as needed
☐ State court complaint
☐ Notice of Removal
☐ Proof of service documents
☐ Evidence of citizenship (if disputing diversity)
☐ Evidence of amount in controversy (if disputing)
IV. Legal Standard
Burden of Proof
☐ Removing party bears burden of establishing federal jurisdiction
☐ Removal statutes construed strictly
☐ Doubts resolved in favor of remand
Standard for Remand
☐ Lack of subject matter jurisdiction: mandatory remand
☐ Procedural defects: discretionary (if timely raised)
V. Request for Costs and Attorneys' Fees
28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)
☐ Request for costs and attorneys' fees included
☐ Removal lacked objectively reasonable basis
☐ Documentation of costs and fees incurred
Fee Documentation
☐ Attorney time records
☐ Billing statements
☐ Declaration of attorney regarding fees
☐ Total fees and costs sought: $[________________]
VI. Opposing Common Removal Arguments
Federal Question Arguments
☐ Preemption does not create federal question
☐ Federal defense does not create jurisdiction
☐ Embedded federal issue not necessarily removable
Diversity Arguments
☐ Citizenship properly alleged in complaint
☐ Defendant is citizen of forum state
☐ Amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000
☐ Document specific damages claim
Forum Defendant Snap Removal
☐ Defendant was properly served before removal
☐ Timing evidence of service vs. removal
VII. Procedural Requirements
Filing the Motion
☐ File motion via CM/ECF
☐ Proper event selected
☐ All attachments included
☐ Certificate of service attached
Service Requirements
☐ Serve all parties via CM/ECF or other permitted method
☐ Certificate of service completed
Briefing Schedule
☐ Opposition due: [__/__/____] (typically 14-21 days per local rule)
☐ Reply due: [__/__/____] (typically 7-14 days per local rule)
VIII. Local Rule Compliance
District: [________________________________]
☐ Local rules on motions reviewed
☐ Page/word limits verified
☐ Meet and confer requirements (if any)
☐ Hearing procedures reviewed
☐ Specific local remand motion requirements
IX. After Remand Order Entered
If Remand Granted
☐ Order specifies return to state court
☐ Federal case closed
☐ State court notified
☐ State court proceedings resume
☐ Fees/costs awarded (if applicable)
Appeal Rights (Very Limited)
☐ Remand orders generally NOT appealable (28 U.S.C. § 1447(d))
☐ Exceptions:
☐ Civil rights cases (28 U.S.C. § 1443)
☐ Class Action Fairness Act cases (28 U.S.C. § 1453)
☐ Certain arbitration cases
X. If Motion Denied
Options After Denial
☐ Interlocutory appeal (rarely available)
☐ Mandamus petition (extraordinary circumstances)
☐ Continue litigating in federal court
☐ Preserve issue for post-judgment appeal
XI. Quality Control Checklist
Before Filing
☐ Deadline verified (30 days for procedural defects)
☐ Grounds for remand clearly identified
☐ Supporting evidence gathered
☐ Legal standard properly applied
☐ Local rules reviewed
☐ All documents proofread
☐ Certificate of service prepared
Common Arguments Addressed
☐ Burden of proof on removing party
☐ Strict construction of removal statute
☐ Doubts resolved in favor of remand
☐ Specific jurisdictional defects identified
XII. Document Tracking Log
| Document | Filed Date | Docket # | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motion to Remand | [__/__/____] | [____] | ☐ Filed |
| Memorandum in Support | [__/__/____] | [____] | ☐ Filed |
| Supporting Declaration(s) | [__/__/____] | [____] | ☐ Filed |
| Exhibits | [__/__/____] | [____] | ☐ Filed |
| Opposition | [__/__/____] | [____] | ☐ Received |
| Reply | [__/__/____] | [____] | ☐ Filed |
| Order on Motion | [__/__/____] | [____] | ☐ Pending |
XIII. Deadline Summary
| Item | Deadline | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motion to Remand (procedural defects) | 30 days from removal | [__/__/____] | ☐ Met |
| Motion to Remand (jurisdictional) | No limit | N/A | ☐ Filed |
| Opposition Due | Per local rules | [__/__/____] | ☐ Pending |
| Reply Due | Per local rules | [__/__/____] | ☐ Pending |
Sources and References
- 28 U.S.C. § 1447: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=28+USC+1447
- 28 U.S.C. § 1441: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=28+USC+1441
- Cornell Law - Removal: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/part-IV/chapter-89
Prepared by: [________________________________]
Date: [__/__/____]
Supervising Attorney (if applicable): [________________________________]
Do more with Ezel
This free template is just the beginning. See how Ezel helps legal teams draft, research, and collaborate faster.
AI that drafts while you watch
Tell the AI what you need and watch your document transform in real-time. No more copy-pasting between tools or manually formatting changes.
- Natural language commands: "Add a force majeure clause"
- Context-aware suggestions based on document type
- Real-time streaming shows edits as they happen
- Milestone tracking and version comparison
Research and draft in one conversation
Ask questions, attach documents, and get answers grounded in case law. Link chats to matters so the AI remembers your context.
- Pull statutes, case law, and secondary sources
- Attach and analyze contracts mid-conversation
- Link chats to matters for automatic context
- Your data never trains AI models
Search like you think
Describe your legal question in plain English. Filter by jurisdiction, date, and court level. Read full opinions without leaving Ezel.
- All 50 states plus federal courts
- Natural language queries - no boolean syntax
- Citation analysis and network exploration
- Copy quotes with automatic citation generation
Ready to transform your legal workflow?
Join legal teams using Ezel to draft documents, research case law, and organize matters — all in one workspace.