FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT VIOLATION DEMAND LETTER

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
AND FIRST-CLASS MAIL

[DATE]

[RECIPIENT NAME - CRA OR FURNISHER]
[RECIPIENT ADDRESS]
[CITY, STATE ZIP]

Re: FCRA Violation Demand - Willful and/or Negligent Noncompliance
Consumer: [CONSUMER FULL NAME]
SSN (Last 4): XXX-XX-[LAST 4 DIGITS]
Date of Birth: [DOB]
Current Address: [CONSUMER ADDRESS]
File/Reference Number: [IF APPLICABLE]

Dear Sir or Madam:

This law firm represents [CONSUMER FULL NAME] ("Consumer" or "Client") regarding your violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), 15 U.S.C. Section 1681 et seq., the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act ("CPPA"), D.C. Code Section 28-3901 et seq., and the D.C. Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act, D.C. Code Section 28-3861 et seq. Please direct all future communications regarding this matter to our office.

I. INTRODUCTION AND NATURE OF CLAIM

This letter constitutes formal notice that your conduct has violated federal and District of Columbia consumer protection laws. The District of Columbia provides robust consumer protections, including its own credit reporting statute and one of the most consumer-friendly consumer protection acts in the nation. We are prepared to pursue all available legal remedies unless this matter is resolved promptly.

TYPE OF DEFENDANT:

[ ] Consumer Reporting Agency ("CRA") - Equifax, Experian, TransUnion, or other CRA
[ ] Furnisher of Information - Creditor, debt collector, or other entity that furnished information
[ ] User of Consumer Reports - Entity that obtained and used our Client's consumer report

II. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA-SPECIFIC LEGAL FRAMEWORK

A. D.C. Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act

The District of Columbia has its own comprehensive credit reporting law, D.C. Code Section 28-3861 et seq., which provides protections that supplement and in some cases exceed federal law.

Key Provisions:
- Section 28-3862: Accuracy requirements for CRAs
- Section 28-3863: Consumer disclosure rights
- Section 28-3864: Permissible purposes
- Section 28-3865: Security freeze provisions
- Section 28-3866: Identity theft victim protections

B. D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act (CPPA)

The D.C. CPPA, D.C. Code Section 28-3901 et seq., is one of the strongest consumer protection statutes in the country.

Prohibited Practices (D.C. Code Section 28-3904):
- Misrepresent a material fact which has tendency to mislead
- Fail to state a material fact if such failure tends to mislead
- Use deceptive representations or designations of origin
- Represent that goods or services have characteristics they do not have
- Make false or misleading statements concerning the reasons for or existence of price reductions

CPPA Remedies (D.C. Code Section 28-3905):
- Treble damages or $1,500 per violation, whichever is greater
- Reasonable attorney's fees
- Costs of suit
- Punitive damages
- Injunctive relief

Important: The D.C. CPPA has been described as having "the broadest reach of any state consumer protection statute." See Ford v. ChartOne, Inc., 908 A.2d 72 (D.C. 2006).

C. Security Freeze Rights

Under D.C. Code Section 28-3865, D.C. consumers have robust security freeze rights:
- Free security freezes for all consumers
- CRAs must place freeze within 3 business days
- Temporary lift within 3 business days
- Protected consumers have enhanced protections

D. D.C. Identity Theft Laws

D.C. addresses identity theft under D.C. Code Section 22-3227.01 et seq.:
- Identity theft is a felony
- Victims have right to file police reports
- Enhanced credit report rights for victims
- Blocking of fraudulent information

E. Statute of Limitations

F. D.C. Attorney General Enforcement

The D.C. Attorney General has authority to enforce consumer protection laws through the Office of Consumer Protection. Complaints may be filed with the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia.

III. SUMMARY OF VIOLATIONS

Federal FCRA Violations - CRA:

[ ] Failure to follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy (15 U.S.C. Section 1681e(b))
[ ] Failure to conduct reasonable reinvestigation upon dispute (15 U.S.C. Section 1681i(a))
[ ] Failure to provide results of reinvestigation within 30 days (15 U.S.C. Section 1681i(a)(1))
[ ] Failure to delete inaccurate or unverifiable information (15 U.S.C. Section 1681i(a)(5))
[ ] Improper reinsertion of previously deleted information (15 U.S.C. Section 1681i(a)(5)(B))

Federal FCRA Violations - Furnisher:

[ ] Furnishing information known to be inaccurate (15 U.S.C. Section 1681s-2(a)(1)(A))
[ ] Failure to correct and update information (15 U.S.C. Section 1681s-2(a)(2))
[ ] Failure to conduct reasonable investigation upon notice of dispute (15 U.S.C. Section 1681s-2(b)(1))
[ ] Failure to modify, delete, or permanently block inaccurate information (15 U.S.C. Section 1681s-2(b)(1)(D))

D.C. Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act Violations:

[ ] Failure to maintain accurate files (D.C. Code Section 28-3862)
[ ] Failure to properly investigate disputes
[ ] Violation of security freeze requirements (D.C. Code Section 28-3865)

D.C. CPPA Violations:

[ ] Misrepresentation of material facts regarding credit information
[ ] Failure to disclose material facts regarding investigation procedures
[ ] Deceptive trade practices in credit reporting

User Violations:

[ ] Obtaining consumer report without permissible purpose (15 U.S.C. Section 1681b; D.C. Code Section 28-3864)
[ ] Failure to provide adverse action notice (15 U.S.C. Section 1681m(a))

IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS

A. Background

Our Client, [CONSUMER FULL NAME], is a resident of the District of Columbia and a consumer as defined by 15 U.S.C. Section 1681a(c) and D.C. Code Section 28-3861. [DEFENDANT NAME] is a [consumer reporting agency/furnisher of information/user of consumer reports] subject to both federal and D.C. law.

B. The Inaccurate Information

The following inaccurate information has been/is being reported on our Client's consumer credit report:

C. Dispute History

Our Client has properly disputed this inaccurate information as follows:

Dispute #1:
- Date of Dispute: [DATE]
- Method: [ ] Online [ ] Mail [ ] Telephone [ ] Direct to Furnisher
- Dispute Description: [SUMMARY OF DISPUTE]
- Response Date: [DATE]
- Response: [SUMMARY - Verified as accurate/Modified/Deleted/No response]
- Confirmation Number: [IF APPLICABLE]

D. Evidence of Inaccuracy

Our Client possesses documentation proving the reported information is inaccurate, including:

[ ] Court records (bankruptcy discharge, judgment satisfaction, case dismissal)
[ ] Payment records and receipts
[ ] Account statements showing accurate information
[ ] Identity theft report (FTC Affidavit)
[ ] Police report filed with D.C. Metropolitan Police
[ ] Correspondence with creditor
[ ] Other: [SPECIFY]

V. LEGAL ANALYSIS

A. Federal FCRA Violations

1. Maximum Possible Accuracy - Section 1681e(b)

The FCRA requires CRAs to "follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy." 15 U.S.C. Section 1681e(b). D.C. is in the D.C. Circuit, which reviews FCRA cases from the District.

You violated this requirement by: [SPECIFY HOW CRA FAILED TO MAINTAIN ACCURACY]

2. Furnisher Investigation Duties - Section 1681s-2(b)

Furnishers must conduct reasonable investigations upon receiving notice of disputes. Merely confirming internal records without meaningful review is insufficient.

You violated this requirement by: [SPECIFY HOW INVESTIGATION WAS UNREASONABLE]

B. D.C. State Law Violations

1. D.C. CPPA Violations

Your conduct constitutes violations of the D.C. CPPA under D.C. Code Section 28-3904:

• Misrepresentation: Your continued assertion that information is accurate when it is not constitutes misrepresentation of a material fact.
• Failure to Disclose: Your failure to disclose the inadequate nature of your investigation procedures misleads consumers.
• Deceptive Practices: Your conduct creates a false impression regarding the reliability of credit reporting.

Under Ford v. ChartOne, Inc., 908 A.2d 72 (D.C. 2006), the CPPA is to be broadly construed to protect consumers.

2. D.C. Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act

Your conduct violates D.C.'s credit reporting law:
- Failure to maintain accurate information (D.C. Code Section 28-3862)
- Failure to properly investigate disputes

C. Willfulness

Your violations were willful within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. Section 1681n. Under Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Burr, 551 U.S. 47 (2007), a violation is willful if knowing or reckless.

Your conduct was [knowing/reckless] because: [EXPLAIN WHY CONDUCT WAS WILLFUL]

VI. DAMAGES

A. Actual Damages

Our Client has suffered the following actual damages:

Credit-Related Damages:
[ ] Denial of credit: [DESCRIBE]
[ ] Increased interest rates: [CALCULATE ADDITIONAL COST]
[ ] Denial of housing/apartment application
[ ] Employment denial or adverse action

Emotional Distress:
[ ] Anxiety and worry
[ ] Embarrassment and humiliation
[ ] Frustration from repeated disputes

Out-of-Pocket Expenses:
[ ] Credit monitoring services: $[AMOUNT]
[ ] Certified mail and postage: $[AMOUNT]
[ ] Time spent disputing: $[AMOUNT]

B. Statutory Damages - Federal FCRA

For willful violations: $100-$1,000 per violation under 15 U.S.C. Section 1681n(a)(1)(A).

C. D.C. CPPA Damages

Under D.C. Code Section 28-3905:
- Treble damages or $1,500 per violation, whichever is greater
- Reasonable attorney's fees
- Costs
- Punitive damages in appropriate cases

Note: The $1,500 per violation minimum is exceptionally favorable to consumers.

D. Punitive Damages

Punitive damages are available under:
- 15 U.S.C. Section 1681n(a)(2) for willful FCRA violations
- D.C. Code Section 28-3905 for CPPA violations

E. Attorney's Fees and Costs

As the prevailing party, our Client is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees under both federal and D.C. law.

VII. PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE

You are hereby placed on notice to preserve all documents and electronically stored information relating to our Client, including but not limited to:

• Complete credit file and all versions thereof
• All dispute records, investigation notes, and correspondence
• All communications with furnishers regarding our Client
• All ACDV/AUD forms and e-OSCAR records
• Policies and procedures for investigating disputes
• Training materials for dispute investigation personnel

VIII. DEMAND FOR SETTLEMENT

To resolve this matter without litigation, we demand:

Immediate Corrective Action:

1. Deletion/Correction: Immediate permanent deletion or correction of all inaccurate information
2. Written Confirmation: Written confirmation within fourteen (14) days
3. Suppression Code: Application of codes to prevent reinsertion

Monetary Compensation:

Payment of $[SETTLEMENT DEMAND] within thirty (30) days, representing:

IX. RESPONSE REQUIRED

Please respond to this demand in writing within thirty (30) days. If we do not receive a satisfactory response, we will file suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or D.C. Superior Court.

X. CONCLUSION

The FCRA and D.C. consumer protection laws exist to ensure accuracy in consumer credit reporting. The D.C. CPPA in particular provides powerful remedies for consumers harmed by deceptive trade practices. Your violations have caused our Client significant harm. We prefer to resolve this matter amicably but are fully prepared to litigate if necessary.

All rights reserved.

Respectfully submitted,

[LAW FIRM NAME]

By: _________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
D.C. Bar No. [NUMBER]
[ADDRESS]
[WASHINGTON, D.C. ZIP]
[TELEPHONE]
[EMAIL]

Attorneys for [CONSUMER FULL NAME]

ENCLOSURES:
[ ] Consumer credit reports showing inaccurate information
[ ] Dispute letters and correspondence
[ ] CRA responses to disputes
[ ] Documentation proving inaccuracy
[ ] Evidence of damages
[ ] Authorization to represent

cc: [CONSUMER NAME] (via email)
[CLIENT FILE]

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA-SPECIFIC PRACTICE NOTES

[ ] Federal Venue: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

[ ] D.C. Circuit: Unique circuit with its own body of case law

[ ] D.C. CPPA Power: Among the strongest consumer protection statutes in the nation
- $1,500 minimum per violation OR treble damages
- Mandatory attorney's fees for prevailing plaintiffs

[ ] Broad CPPA Scope: Applies to any "trade practice" - very broadly interpreted

[ ] AG Complaints: File with Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Office of Consumer Protection, 400 6th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001

[ ] Security Freeze: Free under D.C. Code Section 28-3865

[ ] D.C. Superior Court: Alternative venue with potentially favorable jury pools

[ ] Many Federal Defendants: Many defendants are headquartered or operate in D.C.

[ ] Administrative Agencies: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and FTC are headquartered in D.C.

This template is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with a licensed attorney in the District of Columbia before use.