RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF [________________]
Case No.: [________________]
[________________________________________],
Plaintiff / Petitioner / Moving Party,
v.
[________________________________________],
Defendant / Respondent / Alleged Contemnor.
Dept.: [________]
Hearing Date: [__/__/____]
Hearing Time: [____:____] ☐ AM ☐ PM
RESPONSE OF [________________________________________] TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT
[________________________________________] ("Respondent"), through counsel, respectfully submits this Response to the Order to Show Cause Re: Contempt issued on [__/__/____], and states as follows:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
Respondent respectfully opposes the finding of contempt sought by [________________________________________] ("Moving Party"). The Moving Party has failed to establish the elements of contempt by proof beyond a reasonable doubt as required under California law. Respondent asserts the following defenses.
2. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
- The underlying order at issue was entered on [__/__/____] by this Court.
- The Order to Show Cause Re: Contempt was issued on [__/__/____].
- The alleged contemptuous conduct is: [________________________________________]
- The type of contempt alleged is: ☐ Civil (coercive) ☐ Criminal (punitive) ☐ Unclear
3. STATEMENT OF FACTS
[________________________________________]
[________________________________________]
[________________________________________]
4. LEGAL STANDARD
Under CCP § 1209, contempt is defined as acts of disobedience of lawful court orders. The Moving Party bears the burden of proving each element beyond a reasonable doubt:
(a) Valid order existed — a lawful court order was in effect;
(b) Knowledge — the alleged contemnor had knowledge of the order;
(c) Ability to comply — the alleged contemnor had the present ability to comply;
(d) Willful disobedience — the alleged contemnor willfully disobeyed the order.
In re Cassil (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1081, 1088; In re Liu (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 135.
5. DEFENSES
A. Inability to Comply
☐ Respondent lacked the present ability to comply with the order at the time of the alleged violation.
[________________________________________]
[________________________________________]
Authority: In re Ivey (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 793 — inability to comply is a complete defense to contempt.
B. Ambiguity of the Order
☐ The order at issue was ambiguous and did not clearly require the conduct alleged.
[________________________________________]
Authority: In re Marriage of Niklas (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 1619 — an order must be sufficiently clear and specific to support a contempt finding.
C. Lack of Knowledge
☐ Respondent did not have actual knowledge of the order at the time of the alleged violation.
[________________________________________]
D. Good Faith Compliance / Substantial Compliance
☐ Respondent made good faith efforts to comply with the order.
[________________________________________]
E. Due Process Violations
☐ The contempt proceedings fail to satisfy due process requirements:
☐ Inadequate notice (CCP § 1211(a))
☐ Insufficient specificity in the charging affidavit
☐ Denial of right to counsel
☐ Other: [________________________________________]
F. Other Defenses
☐ Statute of limitations (CCP § 1218.5 — five-year limit for family law contempt)
☐ Changed circumstances since the order was entered
☐ Mootness
☐ Other: [________________________________________]
6. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Respondent respectfully requests that this Court:
(a) Find Respondent NOT in contempt;
(b) Discharge the Order to Show Cause;
(c) Award Respondent attorney's fees and costs incurred in defending this proceeding;
(d) Grant such other relief as the Court deems just.
Dated: [__/__/____]
Respectfully submitted,
Signature: ________________________________________
Printed Name: [________________________________________]
State Bar No.: [________________]
Firm: [________________________________________]
Address: [________________________________________]
Phone: [________________]
Email: [________________]
Attorney for Respondent [________________________________________]
DECLARATION OF [________________________________________]
I, [________________________________________], declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California:
- I am the Respondent in this matter.
- [________________________________________]
- [________________________________________]
- [________________________________________]
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date: [__/__/____]
Signature: ________________________________________
PROOF OF SERVICE
[Standard California proof of service — see CCP § 1013a]
This template is provided for informational purposes only. Contempt proceedings may result in incarceration. Consult a licensed California attorney immediately if you are facing contempt charges.
Need help customizing this document?
Get 3 days of intelligent editing. Tailor every section to your specific case.