Templates Medical Malpractice North Dakota Expert Opinion Affidavit (Certificate of Merit)

North Dakota Expert Opinion Affidavit (Certificate of Merit)

Ready to Edit

EXPERT OPINION AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA — DISTRICT COURT

[___________] JUDICIAL DISTRICT — COUNTY OF [_____________]

Party Role
[PLAINTIFF FULL LEGAL NAME], Plaintiff,
v.
[DEFENDANT PHYSICIAN, M.D.], et al., Defendants.

Case No.: [_______________]

EXPERT OPINION AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46


STATE OF [_______________] )
) ss.
COUNTY OF [_______________] )

[EXPERT FULL NAME], [DEGREE — e.g., M.D., D.O., R.N., P.A.], being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and states as follows:

I. IDENTIFICATION OF EXPERT (N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46)

  1. Name. I am [EXPERT FULL NAME], [DEGREE].

  2. Business Address. My business address is:

[EMPLOYER / INSTITUTION NAME]
[STREET ADDRESS]
[CITY], [STATE] [ZIP]
Telephone: ([___]) [___]-[____]

  1. Field of Expertise. My field of expertise is [SPECIFY — e.g., obstetrics and gynecology; cardiothoracic surgery; emergency medicine; internal medicine — hospitalist; vascular surgery; anesthesiology; nursing — critical care; nursing — labor and delivery]. I am [board-certified / board-eligible] in [SPECIFY] by the [American Board of [_______________] / equivalent].

II. QUALIFICATIONS

  1. I received my [degree — M.D./D.O./B.S.N./etc.] from [INSTITUTION] in [YEAR].

  2. I completed my [residency / fellowship / clinical training] in [SPECIALTY] at [INSTITUTION] in [YEAR], and additional [fellowship / specialty training] in [SUBSPECIALTY] at [INSTITUTION] in [YEAR].

  3. I have been licensed to practice [medicine / nursing / etc.] in the State of [_______________] since [YEAR], license number [_______________]. I am also licensed in [LIST OTHER STATES, IF ANY].

  4. I have practiced [SPECIALTY] for [____] years. During the preceding five (5) years, I have devoted a substantial portion of my professional time to the active clinical practice of [SPECIALTY] and/or to the instruction of students in an accredited residency, fellowship, or other graduate medical or nursing education program in this same field.

  5. I am familiar with the standard of care applicable to [physicians / nurses / hospitals] practicing in the field of [SPECIALTY] in North Dakota and in similar communities, as that standard existed on or about [__/__/____] (the date of the alleged negligence).

  6. A current copy of my curriculum vitae, including a list of all publications, prior testimony, and professional affiliations, is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.

III. MATERIALS REVIEWED

  1. In forming the opinions set forth below, I have reviewed the following materials:

a. The complete medical records of [PLAINTIFF NAME] from [HOSPITAL/CLINIC], for the period [__/__/____] through [__/__/____], including but not limited to:

  • Admission history and physical;
  • Progress notes (physician and nursing);
  • Operative reports for procedures performed on [__/__/____];
  • Anesthesia records;
  • Laboratory and pathology results;
  • Diagnostic imaging studies and reports (radiology, CT, MRI, ultrasound, etc.);
  • Medication administration records (MARs);
  • Discharge summaries;
  • Consultation notes from [SPECIALTIES]; and
  • Subsequent treatment records from [PROVIDERS].

b. Plaintiff's deposition transcript (if available);

c. Pertinent peer-reviewed medical literature, clinical practice guidelines, and standards from [LIST — e.g., American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society of Critical Care Medicine; American Heart Association; Joint Commission];

d. Applicable hospital policies and procedures, to the extent available; and

e. Such other materials as identified in Exhibit B hereto.

  1. The materials I reviewed are of the type customarily relied upon by experts in my field in forming opinions on standard of care, breach, and causation.

IV. APPLICABLE STANDARD OF CARE

  1. On or about [__/__/____], the applicable standard of care required a reasonably prudent [physician practicing in the field of [SPECIALTY] / nurse practicing in the area of [AREA] / hospital] in the same or similar circumstances to:

a. [STANDARD STATEMENT 1 — e.g., obtain an immediate spiral CT or D-dimer for a postpartum patient presenting with new-onset chest discomfort, dyspnea, and tachycardia, in order to evaluate for pulmonary embolism];

b. [STANDARD STATEMENT 2 — e.g., recognize critical changes in vital signs and notify the attending physician within [____] minutes];

c. [STANDARD STATEMENT 3 — e.g., perform a [PROCEDURE] using [TECHNIQUE] with appropriate identification and protection of [ANATOMIC STRUCTURE]];

d. [STANDARD STATEMENT 4 — e.g., obtain consultation from [SPECIALTY] when the patient's presentation includes [SIGNS/SYMPTOMS]];

e. [STANDARD STATEMENT 5 — e.g., adopt and enforce a chain-of-command policy that ensures nursing concerns about deteriorating patients reach the attending physician and, if necessary, the on-call supervisor]; and

f. [ADDITIONAL STANDARD STATEMENTS AS APPLICABLE].

  1. The above standards are well-established, are reflected in the contemporaneous peer-reviewed literature and clinical practice guidelines in effect on [__/__/____], and are taught in accredited [SPECIALTY] residency and fellowship programs nationally, including in North Dakota and in similar communities.

V. BREACH OF STANDARD OF CARE

  1. Based upon my review of the materials identified above, and to a reasonable degree of medical [or nursing] probability, it is my opinion that Defendant [DEFENDANT PHYSICIAN, M.D.] violated the applicable standard of care in the following respects:

a. [BREACH 1 — e.g., failing to order a CT pulmonary angiogram despite Plaintiff's classic presentation for postpartum pulmonary embolism];

b. [BREACH 2 — e.g., failing to recognize and respond to a documented oxygen saturation drop to 86% on room air];

c. [BREACH 3 — e.g., performing the mediastinoscopy without first identifying the right innominate artery and proceeding to biopsy in a manner that lacerated the vessel];

d. [BREACH 4 — e.g., failing to obtain timely vascular surgery consultation when intraoperative bleeding was encountered]; and

e. [ADDITIONAL BREACHES AS APPLICABLE].

  1. It is also my opinion that Defendant [DEFENDANT HOSPITAL/CLINIC ENTITY], through its nurses, technicians, residents, and/or institutional policies, violated the applicable standard of care in the following respects:

a. [INSTITUTIONAL BREACH 1 — e.g., failing to ensure that nursing staff escalated abnormal vital signs through the chain of command];

b. [INSTITUTIONAL BREACH 2 — e.g., failing to maintain a functioning rapid-response team protocol]; and

c. [ADDITIONAL INSTITUTIONAL BREACHES AS APPLICABLE].

VI. CAUSATION

  1. To a reasonable degree of medical [or nursing] probability, it is my opinion that the breaches of the standard of care identified above directly and proximately caused or substantially contributed to Plaintiff's injuries, including:

a. [INJURY 1 — e.g., the right innominate artery laceration and resulting hemorrhagic shock];

b. [INJURY 2 — e.g., the cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and resulting permanent neurologic deficits];

c. [INJURY 3 — e.g., the prolonged hospitalization, additional surgeries, and rehabilitation];

d. [INJURY 4 — e.g., the permanent functional impairment, pain, and disability]; and

e. [ADDITIONAL INJURIES AS APPLICABLE].

  1. Had Defendants complied with the applicable standard of care, Plaintiff would, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, have avoided the above injuries or experienced a materially less severe outcome.

VII. PRIMA FACIE CASE

  1. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff has, in my professional opinion, an admissible expert opinion supporting a prima facie case of professional negligence against the named Defendants under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46.

  2. The opinions expressed herein are preliminary, are based upon the materials currently available to me, and are subject to amendment, supplementation, or refinement as additional information is produced through discovery, including depositions, additional medical records, and any expert reports tendered by Defendants.

VIII. COMPENSATION AND DISCLOSURES

  1. I am being compensated for the time spent reviewing materials and forming the opinions stated herein at the rate of $[____] per hour for record review and report preparation, and $[____] per hour for deposition and trial testimony. My compensation is not contingent on the content of my opinions or the outcome of this action.

  2. Within the preceding four (4) years, I have testified as an expert witness at trial or by deposition in the matters listed in Exhibit C hereto.

IX. AFFIRMATION

  1. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of North Dakota that the foregoing is true and correct.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.

Dated this [____] day of [_______________], [____].

_______________________________
[EXPERT FULL NAME], [DEGREE]


ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF [_______________] )
) ss.
COUNTY OF [_______________] )

Subscribed and sworn to before me by [EXPERT FULL NAME], [DEGREE], this [____] day of [_______________], [____].

_______________________________
Notary Public
My commission expires: [__/__/____]


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the [____] day of [_______________], [____], a true and correct copy of the foregoing Expert Opinion Affidavit Pursuant to N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46 was served upon the following counsel of record by [☐ first-class mail / ☐ email / ☐ Odyssey eFiling / ☐ personal service]:

[OPPOSING COUNSEL NAME]
[FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[EMAIL]

_______________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME], ND Bar No. [_______]
Attorney for Plaintiff


EXHIBITS

  • Exhibit A — Curriculum Vitae of [EXPERT NAME]
  • Exhibit B — Index of Materials Reviewed
  • Exhibit C — Four-Year Testimony List (Trial and Deposition)

ATTORNEY COMPLIANCE NOTES — N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46


Sources and References

  • N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46: https://ndlegis.gov/cencode/t28c01.pdf
  • N.D.C.C. § 28-01-46.1 (definitions): https://codes.findlaw.com/nd/title-28-judicial-procedure-civil/nd-cent-code-sect-28-01-46-1.html
  • North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure: https://www.ndcourts.gov/legal-resources/rules/ndrcivp
  • NCSL summary of merit-affidavit requirements: https://www.ncsl.org/financial-services/medical-liability-malpractice-merit-affidavits-and-expert-witnesses
Ezel AI
Hi! I can rewrite every section of this to your exact case in about 5 minutes. Heads up: I'm $49 for a one-shot, or $249/mo if you want unlimited docs. But that's still less than 10 minutes of what a lawyer charges to even look at this. Want me to do it?
AI Legal Assistant
Ezel AI
Hi! I can rewrite every section of this to your exact case in about 5 minutes. Heads up: I'm $49 for a one-shot, or $249/mo if you want unlimited docs. But that's still less than 10 minutes of what a lawyer charges to even look at this. Want me to do it?

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
certificate_of_merit_nd.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Customize this document with Ezel

  • Deep Legal Knowledge
    Understands case law, statutes, and legal doctrine specific to North Dakota.
  • Court-Ready Formatting
    Proper captions, certificates of service, and local rule compliance.
  • AI-Powered Editing on Your Timeline
    Edit as many times as you need. Tailor every section to your specific case.
  • Export as PDF & Word
    Download your finished document in professional PDF or DOCX format, ready to file or send.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About This Template

Medical malpractice cases involve claims that a doctor, nurse, hospital, or other provider fell below the standard of care and caused an injury. Most states require a pre-suit notice, a certificate or affidavit of merit from another qualified professional, and strict compliance with shortened statutes of limitations. Getting these preliminary documents right is what lets a case actually proceed, because courts dismiss malpractice suits over procedural defects every day.

Important Notice

This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Last updated: May 2026