Connecticut Insurance Bad Faith Demand Letter

Connecticut Insurance Law Updated September 4, 2026 Free Word and PDF

CONNECTICUT INSURANCE BAD FAITH DEMAND LETTER

FORMAL DEMAND AND NOTICE OF CUIPA/CUTPA VIOLATIONS


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
SETTLEMENT COMMUNICATION


DOCUMENT INFORMATION

Field Information
Date of Letter [__/__/____]
Delivery Method ☐ Certified Mail ☐ FedEx/UPS ☐ Hand Delivery ☐ Email

ADDRESSEE INFORMATION

Field Information
Insurance Company [________________________________]
Claims Department Address [________________________________]
City, State, ZIP [________________________________]
Claims Handler [________________________________]
Registered Agent in Connecticut [________________________________]

SENDER/CLAIMANT INFORMATION

Field Information
Insured/Claimant Name [________________________________]
Address [________________________________]
Phone [________________________________]
Attorney Name [________________________________]
Connecticut Juris No. [________________________________]

CLAIM IDENTIFICATION

Field Information
Claim Number [________________________________]
Policy Number [________________________________]
Date of Loss [__/__/____]
Type of Loss ☐ Property ☐ Auto ☐ UM/UIM ☐ Health ☐ Other
Policy Limits $[________________________________]

I. INTRODUCTION

This letter constitutes a formal demand to [INSURANCE COMPANY] ("Insurer") on behalf of [INSURED/CLAIMANT NAME] ("Insured") for payment of benefits owed.

Insurer's conduct violates the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act (CUIPA), Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-816, and constitutes an unfair trade practice under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110a et seq.

Continued refusal to pay will result in litigation seeking:

  • All policy benefits
  • CUTPA damages including punitive damages
  • Attorney's fees and costs

II. SUMMARY OF DEMAND

TOTAL AMOUNT DEMANDED: $[________________________________]

Component Amount
Unpaid/Underpaid Policy Benefits $[________________________________]
Consequential Damages $[________________________________]
TOTAL $[________________________________]

RESPONSE DEADLINE: [__/__/____] (30 days from receipt)


III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. The Insurance Policy

Policy No. [________________________________] issued [__/__/____], providing [________________________________] coverage with limits of $[________________________________].

B. The Loss Event

On [__/__/____], Insured suffered a covered loss:

[________________________________]
[________________________________]

C. Notice and Cooperation

☐ Notice provided on [__/__/____]
☐ Proof of Loss on [__/__/____]
☐ Full cooperation provided
☐ Documentation submitted
☐ Inspection on [__/__/____]


IV. CLAIM HISTORY

Date Event Days
[__/__/____] Loss occurred 0
[__/__/____] Notice provided [____]
[__/__/____] [________________________________] [____]
[__/__/____] Current status: ☐ Denied ☐ Underpaid ☐ Delayed [____]

V. COVERAGE ANALYSIS

Insuring Agreement: [________________________________]

Conditions Satisfied: ☐ Notice ☐ Proof of loss ☐ Cooperation

Exclusion Cited: [________________________________]

Not Applicable Because: [________________________________]

Conclusion: The loss is covered.


VI. IDENTIFICATION OF CUIPA VIOLATIONS

A. CUIPA – Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-816(6)

CUIPA prohibits unfair claim settlement practices. Insurer has violated:

☐ (a) Misrepresenting pertinent facts or policy provisions

  • Conduct: [________________________________]

☐ (b) Failing to acknowledge claims promptly

  • Conduct: [________________________________]

☐ (c) Failing to adopt reasonable investigation standards

  • Conduct: [________________________________]

☐ (d) Refusing to pay without reasonable investigation

  • Conduct: [________________________________]

☐ (e) Failing to affirm or deny coverage within reasonable time

  • Conduct: [________________________________]

☐ (f) Not attempting good faith settlement when liability is clear

  • Conduct: [________________________________]

☐ (g) Compelling litigation by offering substantially less than owed

  • Conduct: [________________________________]

B. "General Business Practice" Requirement

A CUIPA claim requires proof of a "general business practice" – conduct committed with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice. Heyman Assocs. No. 1 v. Ins. Co. of Pa., 231 Conn. 756 (1995).

Evidence of general business practice:
[________________________________]
[________________________________]

C. CUTPA Violations

A CUIPA violation constitutes a CUTPA violation. Mead v. Burns, 199 Conn. 651 (1986).

Note: Under State v. Acordia, Inc., 310 Conn. 1 (2013), insurance-related conduct that violates CUIPA can form the basis of a CUTPA claim.


VII. LEGAL FRAMEWORK – CONNECTICUT BAD FAITH LAW

A. CUIPA/CUTPA Relationship

  • CUIPA (§ 38a-816) defines unfair insurance practices
  • CUTPA (§ 42-110a) provides private cause of action
  • CUIPA violation can support CUTPA claim
  • Must show "general business practice" under CUIPA

B. Common Law Bad Faith

Connecticut recognizes common law bad faith requiring:

  1. Contract where plaintiff expected benefit
  2. Benefit denied or obstructed by defendant
  3. Defendant's actions taken in bad faith

Bad faith requires "reckless indifference to the rights of the insured." Buckman v. People Express, Inc., 205 Conn. 166 (1987).

C. CUTPA Remedies

Under CUTPA, successful plaintiffs may recover:

  • Actual damages
  • Punitive damages in the court's discretion
  • Attorney's fees and costs as the court may award
  • Injunctive or other equitable relief in the court's discretion

D. Key Connecticut Case Law

  1. Heyman Assocs. No. 1 v. Ins. Co. of Pa., 231 Conn. 756 (1995) – General business practice requirement.

  2. Mead v. Burns, 199 Conn. 651 (1986) – CUIPA/CUTPA relationship.

  3. State v. Acordia, Inc., 310 Conn. 1 (2013) – CUTPA requires CUIPA violation in insurance context.

  4. Harrigan v. Fidelity Nat'l Title Ins. Co., 214 Conn. App. 787 (2022) – Clarified "general business practice."

  5. Buckman v. People Express, 205 Conn. 166 (1987) – Common law bad faith elements.


VIII. DAMAGES

A. Contract Damages

Category Amount
Policy benefits owed $[________________________________]
Less: Payments made ($[________________________________])
Total Contract Damages $[________________________________]

B. CUTPA Damages

CUTPA provides for punitive damages where conduct is willful or egregious.

C. Attorney's Fees

CUTPA allows recovery of attorney's fees.

D. Summary

Category Amount
Contract Damages $[________________________________]
CUTPA Damages TBD
Attorney's Fees TBD
TOTAL (excluding punitive) $[________________________________]

IX. SETTLEMENT DEMAND

Insured demands payment of $[________________________________] within THIRTY (30) DAYS.

Payment Instructions

  1. Made payable to: [________________________________]
  2. Delivered to: [________________________________]
  3. Received by: [__/__/____]

Consequences of Non-Payment

If not paid:

  1. Insured will file suit in [________________________________] Superior Court
  2. Insured will seek contract damages, CUTPA damages, punitive damages, and attorney's fees

X. PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE

Preserve all documents and ESI including:
☐ Claim file ☐ Communications ☐ Adjuster notes ☐ Similar claims (for pattern evidence)


XI. INSURANCE DEPARTMENT COMPLAINT

Insured reserves the right to file with:

Connecticut Insurance Department
P.O. Box 816
Hartford, CT 06142-0816
(860) 297-3800


XII. CONCLUSION

Insurer's conduct violates CUIPA and CUTPA. This demand provides an opportunity to resolve before litigation seeking punitive damages.


SIGNATURE

Insured:

Signature: _______________________________________________

Print Name: [________________________________]

Date: [__/__/____]

Attorney:

Signature: _______________________________________________

Print Name: [________________________________]

CT Juris No.: [________________________________]

Date: [__/__/____]


EXHIBITS

☐ Exhibit A: Insurance Policy
☐ Exhibit B: Proof of Loss
☐ Exhibit C: Correspondence
☐ Exhibit D: Denial Letter


All rights under Connecticut law are expressly reserved.

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)Choose a plan

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
bad_faith_demand_ct_ct.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Draft it in the editor

The AI drafts each section from your answers and you review every word. Drafting from scratch takes hours; finish yours for $99 one time.

  • Built on this template
    Uses the Connecticut version and the statutes it cites.
  • Formatted like the template
    Captions, numbering and layout stay intact.
  • AI editing
    Rewrite any section from your own notes.
  • Export as PDF and Word
    Yours to review, sign, or file.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About this template

Last updated
September 4, 2026
Jurisdiction
Connecticut
Category
Insurance Law

Legal authority

  • Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-816 (CUIPA - Unfair Insurance Practices)
  • Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110a et seq. (CUTPA - Unfair Trade Practices)
  • Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-815 (Insurance Trade Practices)

Insurance law covers the rights of policyholders against insurance companies that deny claims, delay payment, or undervalue losses. Demand letters, proof of loss forms, and bad-faith complaints all have their own state-specific deadlines and format requirements. Carefully written insurance paperwork puts the claim on the record, triggers the insurer's legal obligations, and preserves the right to recover extra damages if the insurer behaves badly.

Not legal advice

This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Checked against the law it cites

The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110g(a), (d) (checked September 4, 2026): "Any person who suffers any ascertainable loss of money or property, real or personal, as a result of the use or employment of a method, act or practice prohibited by section 42-110b, may bring an action in the judicial district in which the plaintiff or defendant resides or has his principal place of business or is doing business, to recover actual damages. The court may, in its discretion, award punitive damages and may provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper. In any action brought by a person under this section, the court may award, to the plaintiff, in addition to the relief provided in this section, costs and reasonable attorneys' fees based on the work reasonably performed by an attorney and not on the amount of recovery."

Draft your Connecticut Insurance Bad Faith Demand Letter in the editor

Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.