TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Cover Page
2. Table of Authorities
3. Preliminary Statement
4. Statement of the Issues
5. Statement of the Case
6. Statement of Facts
7. Standard of Review
8. Argument
9. Conclusion
10. Certificate of Service

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA

APPELLANT'S BRIEF

Attorney for Defendant-Appellant:

[________________________________]
[________________________________] (SD Bar No. [________________________________])
[________________________________]
[________________________________], South Dakota [________________________________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

Statutes

Rules

I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered in the Circuit Court, [____] Judicial Circuit, [________________________________] County, South Dakota, the Honorable [________________________________] presiding.

Defendant-Appellant [________________________________] was convicted of [________________________________] and sentenced to [________________________________].

II. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

1. Whether the circuit court erred in [________________________________].

The circuit court ruled: [________________________________]

2. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for [________________________________].

The circuit court ruled: [________________________________]

3. [________________________________]

III. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On or about [__/__/____], an ☐ Indictment / ☐ Information was filed in the Circuit Court, [________________________________] County, charging Defendant-Appellant with:

[Summarize pretrial proceedings, motions, and rulings.]

[________________________________]

On [__/__/____], the case proceeded to ☐ jury trial / ☐ bench trial / ☐ Defendant entered a plea of ☐ guilty / ☐ no contest.

On [__/__/____], the ☐ jury returned a verdict of / ☐ court found:

[________________________________]

On [__/__/____], the circuit court sentenced Defendant-Appellant to:

[________________________________]

(TR [____]; SR [____].)

Notice of appeal was filed on [__/__/____]. (SR [____].)

IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS

A. State's Evidence

[________________________________]

(TR [____].)

B. Defense Evidence

[________________________________]

(TR [____].)

C. Rebuttal (if any)

[________________________________]

(TR [____].)

V. STANDARD OF REVIEW

Issue 1: [________________________________]

☐ De novo review applies to questions of law, including constitutional issues. (State v. Beynon, 2014 S.D. 41, 850 N.W.2d 838.)

☐ Abuse of discretion applies to discretionary rulings, including evidentiary and sentencing matters. (State v. Guthrie, 2001 S.D. 61, 627 N.W.2d 401.)

☐ Sufficiency of the evidence — the court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and determines whether a rational trier of fact could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. (State v. Carter, 2009 S.D. 65, 771 N.W.2d 7.)

☐ Clearly erroneous applies to findings of fact. (State v. Grooms, 399 N.W.2d 358 (S.D. 1987).)

Issue 2: [________________________________]

VI. ARGUMENT

A. [ISSUE ONE HEADING IN CAPS]

[________________________________]

1. Relevant Proceedings Below

[________________________________]

(TR [____]; SR [____].)

2. Applicable Legal Principles

[________________________________]

3. Analysis

[________________________________]

4. Prejudice / Harmless Error

☐ Under Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967), the constitutional error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because [________________________________].

☐ Under South Dakota's statutory harmless-error standard (SDCL § 23A-44-14), the error affected the substantial rights of the defendant because [________________________________].

[________________________________]

B. [ISSUE TWO HEADING IN CAPS]

[________________________________]

1. Relevant Proceedings Below

[________________________________]

(TR [____]; SR [____].)

2. Applicable Legal Principles

[________________________________]

3. Analysis

[________________________________]

4. Prejudice / Harmless Error

[________________________________]

C. [ADDITIONAL ISSUES AS NEEDED]

[________________________________]

VII. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Defendant-Appellant respectfully requests that this Court:

☐ Reverse the judgment of conviction.
☐ Reverse and remand for a new trial.
☐ Modify the judgment as follows: [________________________________].
☐ Vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
☐ [________________________________]

Respectfully submitted,

Date: [__/__/____]

_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
Attorney for Defendant-Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, [________________________________], certify that on [__/__/____], I served the foregoing Appellant's Brief on the following parties by the method indicated:

☐ U.S. Mail, first-class, postage prepaid
☐ Electronic service via the South Dakota Unified Judicial System eFiling
☐ Hand delivery

Date: [__/__/____]

_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]

STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES FOR SOUTH DAKOTA

1. No Intermediate Appellate Court: South Dakota has no intermediate appellate court. All criminal appeals go directly to the South Dakota Supreme Court.

2. Page Limits: For proportionally spaced typeface, principal briefs may not exceed 32 pages; reply briefs 16 pages. For monospaced typeface, principal briefs may not exceed 40 pages; reply briefs 20 pages. (S.D. Sup. Ct. Rule 13-06.)

3. Notice of Appeal: In criminal cases, the notice of appeal must be filed within the time allowed under SDCL § 23A-32-4 (generally within 30 days of judgment).

4. Assigned Counsel: For indigent defendants, appellate counsel may be assigned under SDCL § 23A-40-7.

5. Preservation of Issues: Issues not raised before the circuit court are generally not preserved for appellate review. Plain error may be noticed in exceptional circumstances affecting fundamental fairness.

6. Habeas Corpus: Separate from direct appeal, habeas corpus relief is available under SDCL ch. 21-27.

7. Oral Argument: The Supreme Court may schedule oral argument. Requests may be made in the brief.

8. Electronic Filing: Briefs must be electronically filed through the South Dakota Unified Judicial System's electronic filing system.