TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Cover Page
2. Table of Authorities
3. Statement of the Issues
4. Statement of the Case
5. Statement of Facts
6. Standard of Review
7. Argument
8. Conclusion
9. Certificate of Compliance
10. Certificate of Service

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

BRIEF OF APPELLANT

Attorney for Appellant:

[________________________________]
Kansas Supreme Court No. [________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________], Kansas [________________________________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

Statutes

Rules

I. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES

Issue 1

Whether the trial court erred in [________________________________].

Trial court ruling: [________________________________]

Where raised: [________________________________] (R. [____], L. [____].)

Issue 2

Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for [________________________________].

Trial court ruling: [________________________________]

Where raised: [________________________________] (R. [____], L. [____].)

Issue 3

Whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by [________________________________].

Trial court ruling: [________________________________]

Where raised: [________________________________]

II. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On or about [__/__/____], an ☐ information / ☐ indictment / ☐ complaint was filed in the District Court of [________________________________] County, Kansas, charging Appellant with:

[Summarize significant pretrial proceedings, motions, and rulings.]

[________________________________]

On [__/__/____], the case proceeded to ☐ jury trial / ☐ bench trial / ☐ the defendant entered a plea of ☐ guilty / ☐ no contest.

On [__/__/____], the jury returned a verdict of:

[________________________________]

On [__/__/____], the district court sentenced Appellant to:

[________________________________]

(R. [____], L. [____]; Tr. [____].)

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS

A. State's Case

[________________________________]

(R. [____], L. [____].)

B. Defense Case

[________________________________]

(R. [____], L. [____].)

IV. STANDARD OF REVIEW

Issue 1: [________________________________]

☐ Unlimited / de novo review applies to questions of law, including statutory interpretation and constitutional questions. (State v. Williams, 303 Kan. 585, 363 P.3d 1101 (2016).)

☐ Abuse of discretion applies to the trial court's discretionary rulings, including evidentiary matters. A court abuses its discretion when no reasonable person would agree with the decision. (State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 256 P.3d 801 (2011).)

☐ Sufficiency of the evidence — viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court must be convinced that a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. (State v. Frye, 294 Kan. 364, 277 P.3d 1091 (2012).)

☐ Clear error review applies to factual findings underlying legal determinations, such as suppression rulings. (State v. Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 127 P.3d 986 (2006).)

Issue 2: [________________________________]

V. ARGUMENT

A. [ISSUE ONE HEADING]

[________________________________]

1. Relevant Proceedings Below

[________________________________]

(R. [____], L. [____]; Tr. [____].)

2. Applicable Legal Principles

[________________________________]

3. Analysis

[________________________________]

4. Prejudice

☐ Under Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967), the constitutional error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because [________________________________].

☐ Under State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 256 P.3d 801 (2011), using the statutory harmless-error standard of K.S.A. § 60-261, the error was not harmless because there is a reasonable probability that the error affected the outcome of the trial.

B. [ISSUE TWO HEADING]

[________________________________]

1. Relevant Proceedings Below

[________________________________]

(R. [____], L. [____]; Tr. [____].)

2. Applicable Legal Principles

[________________________________]

3. Analysis

[________________________________]

4. Prejudice

[________________________________]

C. [ADDITIONAL ISSUES AS NEEDED]

[________________________________]

VI. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Appellant respectfully requests that this Court:

☐ Reverse the judgment of conviction and remand with directions to dismiss.
☐ Reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.
☐ Vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
☐ Modify the judgment as follows: [________________________________].
☐ [________________________________]

Respectfully submitted,

Date: [__/__/____]

_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Kansas Supreme Court Rule 6.07, I certify that this brief contains [________________________________] words, as counted by [________________________________] word-processing program. This brief does not exceed the 15,000-word limit.

Date: [__/__/____]

_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, [________________________________], hereby certify that on [__/__/____], I served the foregoing Brief of Appellant on the following parties by the method indicated:

☐ U.S. Mail, first-class, postage prepaid
☐ Electronic filing via Kansas Courts eFiling
☐ Hand delivery

_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]

STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES FOR KANSAS

1. Notice of Appeal Deadline: Must be filed within 14 days after the judgment of the district court (K.S.A. § 22-3608(a)). This is notably shorter than most states.

2. Word Limit: Brief may not exceed 15,000 words; reply brief may not exceed 15 pages (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 6.07).

3. Appellant's Brief Due: Within 30 days after the transcript is filed by the court reporter (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 6.01(a)). If no transcript is requested, 40 days after docketing.

4. Appellee's Brief Due: Within 30 days after service of the appellant's brief (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 6.01(a)).

5. Reply Brief Due: Within 14 days after service of the appellee's brief.

6. Docketing Statement: Must be filed within 21 days after filing the notice of appeal (Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 2.041).

7. Direct Appeal to Supreme Court: First-degree murder convictions and cases where the constitutionality of a statute is questioned are appealed directly to the Kansas Supreme Court (K.S.A. § 22-3601(b)).

8. Anders Brief: When appointed counsel finds no meritorious issues, counsel must comply with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982).

9. K.S.A. § 60-1507: Post-conviction claims, including ineffective-assistance claims requiring evidence outside the record, are raised by motion under K.S.A. § 60-1507.

10. Preservation: A contemporaneous objection is generally required to preserve an issue. Unpreserved constitutional claims may be raised for the first time on appeal in limited circumstances. (State v. Godfrey, 301 Kan. 1041, 350 P.3d 1068 (2015).)