APA Comment Letter (General)

Ready to Edit

PUBLIC COMMENT ON PROPOSED RULEMAKING

OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT — ORC § 119.03


RULEMAKING INFORMATION

Item Detail
Governing Statute ORC § 119.03 (Ohio Administrative Procedure Act)
Publication Register of Ohio (online at registerofohio.state.oh.us)
Comment Period Typically 30 days, set by the agency; may be lengthened or shortened
Public Hearing Required between 31 and 40 days after filing the rule with JCARR
JCARR Review Jurisdiction lasts 65 days from original filing or 30 days from refiling
Five-Year Sunset All agency rules must be reviewed every 5 years under ORC § 119.032
Filing With Secretary of State, JCARR, and Legislative Service Commission (LSC)
Submission of Comments Submit to the agency per instructions in the notice; also consider submitting to JCARR

COMMENT LETTER

Date: [__/__/____]

Via: ☐ U.S. Mail ☐ Email ☐ Electronic submission ☐ Hand delivery ☐ Facsimile


[Agency Name]
[________________________________]
Attn: [________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
[City, State ZIP]

Email (if applicable): [________________________________]


Copy to:
Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review (JCARR)
77 South High Street, Concourse Level
Columbus, Ohio 43215


Re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

  • Register of Ohio Filing Date: [__/__/____]
  • Rule Number(s): Ohio Admin. Code [________________________________]
  • Agency: [________________________________]
  • Proposed Rule Title/Subject: [________________________________]
  • Public Hearing Date: [__/__/____]
  • Comment Deadline: [__/__/____]

Dear [________________________________] (Agency Contact / Rules Coordinator):

I. IDENTIFICATION OF COMMENTER

  1. The following comment is submitted by [________________________________] ("Commenter") regarding the above-referenced proposed rulemaking filed with the Register of Ohio on [__/__/____].

  2. Commenter is a ☐ individual / ☐ business entity / ☐ trade or professional association / ☐ nonprofit organization / ☐ governmental entity / ☐ law firm / ☐ other: [________________________________].

  3. Commenter's address is [________________________________], [________________________________], Ohio [____].

  4. Contact person: [________________________________]
    - Telephone: [________________________________]
    - Email: [________________________________]

  5. Commenter's interest in this rulemaking: [________________________________]


II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF COMMENTS

  1. Commenter respectfully submits the following principal comments and recommendations:

a. Comment 1: [________________________________]

b. Comment 2: [________________________________]

c. Comment 3: [________________________________]

d. Comment 4: [________________________________]


III. DETAILED COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS

A. Comment on Proposed Ohio Admin. Code § [________________________________]
  1. Proposed Rule Text (Section/Subsection): [________________________________]

  2. Specific Concern: [________________________________]

  3. Legal Authority Analysis:

a. The proposed rule ☐ exceeds / ☐ is consistent with / ☐ is in tension with the Agency's statutory authority under ORC § [________________________________].

b. Under ORC § 119.03(A), a rule must be adopted in accordance with the agency's enabling statute. The proposed rule [________________________________].

c. JCARR may invalidate a rule that exceeds the agency's statutory authority, conflicts with the legislative intent of the enabling statute, or conflicts with another rule (ORC § 106.021). The proposed rule [________________________________].

  1. Impact Analysis:

a. Economic impact: [________________________________]

b. Regulatory burden: [________________________________]

c. Impact on small businesses: [________________________________]

d. Impact on local governments: [________________________________]

e. Cost of compliance vs. regulatory benefit: [________________________________]

  1. Recommended Change: [________________________________]

  2. Supporting Data/Evidence: [________________________________]


B. Comment on Proposed Ohio Admin. Code § [________________________________]
  1. Proposed Rule Text: [________________________________]

  2. Specific Concern: [________________________________]

  3. Legal Authority Analysis: [________________________________]

  4. Impact Analysis: [________________________________]

  5. Recommended Change: [________________________________]

  6. Supporting Data/Evidence: [________________________________]


C. Comment on Proposed Ohio Admin. Code § [________________________________]
  1. Proposed Rule Text: [________________________________]

  2. Specific Concern: [________________________________]

  3. Legal Authority Analysis: [________________________________]

  4. Impact Analysis: [________________________________]

  5. Recommended Change: [________________________________]

  6. Supporting Data/Evidence: [________________________________]


IV. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE RULE LANGUAGE (IF APPLICABLE)

  1. Commenter proposes the following alternative language:

Current Proposed Language:

[________________________________]

Commenter's Recommended Language:

[________________________________]

Explanation of Changes: [________________________________]


V. COMMENTS ON THE AGENCY'S FISCAL ANALYSIS AND BUSINESS IMPACT ANALYSIS

  1. ORC § 119.03(A) requires agencies to prepare a fiscal analysis and business impact analysis for proposed rules. Commenter provides the following comments:

a. ☐ The agency's fiscal analysis accurately reflects the costs
b. ☐ The agency's fiscal analysis understates costs because: [________________________________]
c. ☐ The business impact analysis does not adequately address the impact on: [________________________________]
d. ☐ The Common Sense Initiative (CSI) review did not adequately consider: [________________________________]
e. ☐ Additional economic data: [________________________________]


VI. FIVE-YEAR RULE REVIEW COMMENTS (IF APPLICABLE)

  1. If this rulemaking is part of the five-year rule review under ORC § 119.032, Commenter provides the following comments:

a. ☐ The rule should be continued without amendment because: [________________________________]
b. ☐ The rule should be amended as follows: [________________________________]
c. ☐ The rule should be rescinded because: [________________________________]
d. ☐ The rule is outdated and no longer necessary because: [________________________________]
e. ☐ The rule duplicates other regulatory requirements at: [________________________________]


VII. JCARR REVIEW CRITERIA

  1. Commenter requests that JCARR review the proposed rule under the following criteria (ORC § 106.021):

a. ☐ The rule exceeds the agency's statutory authority
b. ☐ The rule conflicts with the legislative intent of the enabling statute
c. ☐ The rule conflicts with another rule of the same or another agency
d. ☐ The rule imposes an undue hardship on those it affects
e. ☐ The rule is unclear or ambiguous
f. ☐ Other concerns for JCARR consideration: [________________________________]


VIII. REQUEST TO TESTIFY AT PUBLIC HEARING

  1. ☐ Commenter requests to testify at the public hearing scheduled for [__/__/____] at [________________________________] (location).

a. Estimated testimony length: [____] minutes
b. Topics to be addressed: [________________________________]
c. ☐ Written testimony will be submitted in advance


IX. CONCLUSION

  1. For the foregoing reasons, Commenter respectfully requests that the Agency:

a. ☐ Withdraw the proposed rule in its entirety
b. ☐ Adopt the proposed rule with the modifications recommended herein
c. ☐ Repropose the rule with changes and provide a new comment period
d. ☐ Extend the comment period
e. ☐ Other: [________________________________]

  1. Commenter appreciates the opportunity to participate in this rulemaking and is available to provide additional information or testimony.

Respectfully submitted,

________________________________________
[Name]
[Title]
[Organization]
[Address Line 1]
[Address Line 2]
[City, State ZIP]
[Telephone]
[Email]

Date: [__/__/____]


COMMENT PREPARATION CHECKLIST

☐ Identify the proposed rule on the Register of Ohio website (registerofohio.state.oh.us)
☐ Verify the comment deadline and public hearing date
☐ Obtain the full text of the proposed rule from the Register of Ohio
☐ Review the agency's rule summary and fiscal analysis
☐ Review the business impact analysis
☐ Review the Common Sense Initiative (CSI) recommendation (if applicable)
☐ Identify all sections of the proposed rule that affect your interests
☐ Research the agency's statutory authority under the Ohio Revised Code
☐ Determine whether this is a new rule, amendment, or five-year review
☐ Gather supporting data, economic analyses, and expert opinions
☐ Draft specific recommended changes with alternative rule language
☐ Consider submitting a copy of comments to JCARR
☐ If planning to testify at the public hearing, register with the agency
☐ Retain a dated copy of the submitted comment and proof of delivery


COMMON ISSUES CHECKLIST

Statutory Authority — Does the agency have authority to adopt the proposed rule?
Legislative Intent — Is the proposed rule consistent with the legislative intent?
JCARR Criteria — Does the rule meet the criteria for JCARR approval?
Constitutional Issues — Does the proposed rule raise constitutional concerns?
Vagueness — Are the requirements clear and definite?
Consistency — Is the proposed rule consistent with other rules and statutes?
Federal Preemption — Does the proposed rule conflict with federal law?
Economic Impact — Are costs reasonable relative to the regulatory benefit?
Small Business Impact — Has the agency minimized the burden on small businesses?
Five-Year Review — If applicable, has the rule been adequately reviewed for continued necessity?
Enforceability — Are compliance obligations practical and enforceable?
Effective Date — Is the implementation timeline reasonable?
Recordkeeping — Are reporting and documentation requirements reasonable?


OHIO RULEMAKING PROCESS OVERVIEW

  1. Proposal — Agency files proposed rule, fiscal analysis, and rule summary with Secretary of State, JCARR, and LSC; published in Register of Ohio
  2. Common Sense Initiative (CSI) Review — For rules with business impact, agency submits to CSI for review before filing
  3. Public Comment Period — Typically 30 days; agency sets the specific deadline
  4. Public Hearing — Required between 31 and 40 days after filing with JCARR
  5. JCARR Review — JCARR has 65 days of jurisdiction from original filing (or 30 days from refiling) to review and potentially recommend invalidation
  6. Agency Adoption — Agency files final rule with LSC for codification in the Ohio Administrative Code
  7. Five-Year Review — All rules must be reviewed every 5 years under ORC § 119.032; agencies must determine whether to continue, amend, or rescind each rule
  8. Effective Date — Rule takes effect 10 days after filing the final rule (unless a different effective date is specified by statute)

SOURCES AND REFERENCES

  • Ohio Administrative Procedure Act: ORC Chapter 119
  • Rulemaking Procedures: ORC § 119.03
  • Five-Year Rule Review: ORC § 119.032
  • Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review (JCARR): ORC §§ 106.021-106.031
  • Register of Ohio: https://www.registerofohio.state.oh.us/
  • Ohio Administrative Code: https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-administrative-code
  • JCARR: https://www.jcarr.state.oh.us/
  • RuleWatch Ohio: https://www.rulewatchohio.gov/

This template is provided by ezel.ai for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be used without review by a qualified attorney licensed in Ohio.

Ezel AI
Hi! I can rewrite every section of this to your exact case in about 5 minutes. Heads up: I'm $49 for a one-shot, or $249/mo if you want unlimited docs. But that's still less than 10 minutes of what a lawyer charges to even look at this. Want me to do it?
AI Legal Assistant
Ezel AI
Hi! I can rewrite every section of this to your exact case in about 5 minutes. Heads up: I'm $49 for a one-shot, or $249/mo if you want unlimited docs. But that's still less than 10 minutes of what a lawyer charges to even look at this. Want me to do it?

Insert Image

Insert Table

Watch Ezel in action (sample case)

All changes saved
Save
Export
Export as DOCX
Export as PDF
Generating PDF...
apa_comment_letter_general_oh.pdf
Ready to export as PDF or Word
AI is editing...
Chat
Review

Customize this document with Ezel

  • Deep Legal Knowledge
    Understands case law, statutes, and legal doctrine specific to Ohio.
  • Court-Ready Formatting
    Proper captions, certificates of service, and local rule compliance.
  • AI-Powered Editing on Your Timeline
    Edit as many times as you need. Tailor every section to your specific case.
  • Export as PDF & Word
    Download your finished document in professional PDF or DOCX format, ready to file or send.
Secure checkout via Stripe
Need to customize this document?

About This Template

Administrative law covers how you interact with government agencies, from filing a comment on a proposed rule to appealing a denied license or benefit. Agency processes have their own forms, deadlines, and evidence standards that are different from what courts use. Getting the paperwork wrong usually means missing a deadline or losing the right to appeal, so precision in these documents matters as much as it does in a courtroom filing.

Important Notice

This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.

Last updated: March 2026