APA Comment Letter (General)
PUBLIC COMMENT ON PROPOSED RULEMAKING
OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT — ORC § 119.03
RULEMAKING INFORMATION
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Governing Statute | ORC § 119.03 (Ohio Administrative Procedure Act) |
| Publication | Register of Ohio (online at registerofohio.state.oh.us) |
| Comment Period | Typically 30 days, set by the agency; may be lengthened or shortened |
| Public Hearing | Required between 31 and 40 days after filing the rule with JCARR |
| JCARR Review | Jurisdiction lasts 65 days from original filing or 30 days from refiling |
| Five-Year Sunset | All agency rules must be reviewed every 5 years under ORC § 119.032 |
| Filing With | Secretary of State, JCARR, and Legislative Service Commission (LSC) |
| Submission of Comments | Submit to the agency per instructions in the notice; also consider submitting to JCARR |
COMMENT LETTER
Date: [__/__/____]
Via: ☐ U.S. Mail ☐ Email ☐ Electronic submission ☐ Hand delivery ☐ Facsimile
[Agency Name]
[________________________________]
Attn: [________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
[City, State ZIP]
Email (if applicable): [________________________________]
Copy to:
Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review (JCARR)
77 South High Street, Concourse Level
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
- Register of Ohio Filing Date: [__/__/____]
- Rule Number(s): Ohio Admin. Code [________________________________]
- Agency: [________________________________]
- Proposed Rule Title/Subject: [________________________________]
- Public Hearing Date: [__/__/____]
- Comment Deadline: [__/__/____]
Dear [________________________________] (Agency Contact / Rules Coordinator):
I. IDENTIFICATION OF COMMENTER
-
The following comment is submitted by [________________________________] ("Commenter") regarding the above-referenced proposed rulemaking filed with the Register of Ohio on [__/__/____].
-
Commenter is a ☐ individual / ☐ business entity / ☐ trade or professional association / ☐ nonprofit organization / ☐ governmental entity / ☐ law firm / ☐ other: [________________________________].
-
Commenter's address is [________________________________], [________________________________], Ohio [____].
-
Contact person: [________________________________]
- Telephone: [________________________________]
- Email: [________________________________] -
Commenter's interest in this rulemaking: [________________________________]
II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF COMMENTS
- Commenter respectfully submits the following principal comments and recommendations:
a. Comment 1: [________________________________]
b. Comment 2: [________________________________]
c. Comment 3: [________________________________]
d. Comment 4: [________________________________]
III. DETAILED COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS
A. Comment on Proposed Ohio Admin. Code § [________________________________]
-
Proposed Rule Text (Section/Subsection): [________________________________]
-
Specific Concern: [________________________________]
-
Legal Authority Analysis:
a. The proposed rule ☐ exceeds / ☐ is consistent with / ☐ is in tension with the Agency's statutory authority under ORC § [________________________________].
b. Under ORC § 119.03(A), a rule must be adopted in accordance with the agency's enabling statute. The proposed rule [________________________________].
c. JCARR may invalidate a rule that exceeds the agency's statutory authority, conflicts with the legislative intent of the enabling statute, or conflicts with another rule (ORC § 106.021). The proposed rule [________________________________].
- Impact Analysis:
a. Economic impact: [________________________________]
b. Regulatory burden: [________________________________]
c. Impact on small businesses: [________________________________]
d. Impact on local governments: [________________________________]
e. Cost of compliance vs. regulatory benefit: [________________________________]
-
Recommended Change: [________________________________]
-
Supporting Data/Evidence: [________________________________]
B. Comment on Proposed Ohio Admin. Code § [________________________________]
-
Proposed Rule Text: [________________________________]
-
Specific Concern: [________________________________]
-
Legal Authority Analysis: [________________________________]
-
Impact Analysis: [________________________________]
-
Recommended Change: [________________________________]
-
Supporting Data/Evidence: [________________________________]
C. Comment on Proposed Ohio Admin. Code § [________________________________]
-
Proposed Rule Text: [________________________________]
-
Specific Concern: [________________________________]
-
Legal Authority Analysis: [________________________________]
-
Impact Analysis: [________________________________]
-
Recommended Change: [________________________________]
-
Supporting Data/Evidence: [________________________________]
IV. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE RULE LANGUAGE (IF APPLICABLE)
- Commenter proposes the following alternative language:
Current Proposed Language:
[________________________________]
Commenter's Recommended Language:
[________________________________]
Explanation of Changes: [________________________________]
V. COMMENTS ON THE AGENCY'S FISCAL ANALYSIS AND BUSINESS IMPACT ANALYSIS
- ORC § 119.03(A) requires agencies to prepare a fiscal analysis and business impact analysis for proposed rules. Commenter provides the following comments:
a. ☐ The agency's fiscal analysis accurately reflects the costs
b. ☐ The agency's fiscal analysis understates costs because: [________________________________]
c. ☐ The business impact analysis does not adequately address the impact on: [________________________________]
d. ☐ The Common Sense Initiative (CSI) review did not adequately consider: [________________________________]
e. ☐ Additional economic data: [________________________________]
VI. FIVE-YEAR RULE REVIEW COMMENTS (IF APPLICABLE)
- If this rulemaking is part of the five-year rule review under ORC § 119.032, Commenter provides the following comments:
a. ☐ The rule should be continued without amendment because: [________________________________]
b. ☐ The rule should be amended as follows: [________________________________]
c. ☐ The rule should be rescinded because: [________________________________]
d. ☐ The rule is outdated and no longer necessary because: [________________________________]
e. ☐ The rule duplicates other regulatory requirements at: [________________________________]
VII. JCARR REVIEW CRITERIA
- Commenter requests that JCARR review the proposed rule under the following criteria (ORC § 106.021):
a. ☐ The rule exceeds the agency's statutory authority
b. ☐ The rule conflicts with the legislative intent of the enabling statute
c. ☐ The rule conflicts with another rule of the same or another agency
d. ☐ The rule imposes an undue hardship on those it affects
e. ☐ The rule is unclear or ambiguous
f. ☐ Other concerns for JCARR consideration: [________________________________]
VIII. REQUEST TO TESTIFY AT PUBLIC HEARING
- ☐ Commenter requests to testify at the public hearing scheduled for [__/__/____] at [________________________________] (location).
a. Estimated testimony length: [____] minutes
b. Topics to be addressed: [________________________________]
c. ☐ Written testimony will be submitted in advance
IX. CONCLUSION
- For the foregoing reasons, Commenter respectfully requests that the Agency:
a. ☐ Withdraw the proposed rule in its entirety
b. ☐ Adopt the proposed rule with the modifications recommended herein
c. ☐ Repropose the rule with changes and provide a new comment period
d. ☐ Extend the comment period
e. ☐ Other: [________________________________]
- Commenter appreciates the opportunity to participate in this rulemaking and is available to provide additional information or testimony.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________
[Name]
[Title]
[Organization]
[Address Line 1]
[Address Line 2]
[City, State ZIP]
[Telephone]
[Email]
Date: [__/__/____]
COMMENT PREPARATION CHECKLIST
☐ Identify the proposed rule on the Register of Ohio website (registerofohio.state.oh.us)
☐ Verify the comment deadline and public hearing date
☐ Obtain the full text of the proposed rule from the Register of Ohio
☐ Review the agency's rule summary and fiscal analysis
☐ Review the business impact analysis
☐ Review the Common Sense Initiative (CSI) recommendation (if applicable)
☐ Identify all sections of the proposed rule that affect your interests
☐ Research the agency's statutory authority under the Ohio Revised Code
☐ Determine whether this is a new rule, amendment, or five-year review
☐ Gather supporting data, economic analyses, and expert opinions
☐ Draft specific recommended changes with alternative rule language
☐ Consider submitting a copy of comments to JCARR
☐ If planning to testify at the public hearing, register with the agency
☐ Retain a dated copy of the submitted comment and proof of delivery
COMMON ISSUES CHECKLIST
☐ Statutory Authority — Does the agency have authority to adopt the proposed rule?
☐ Legislative Intent — Is the proposed rule consistent with the legislative intent?
☐ JCARR Criteria — Does the rule meet the criteria for JCARR approval?
☐ Constitutional Issues — Does the proposed rule raise constitutional concerns?
☐ Vagueness — Are the requirements clear and definite?
☐ Consistency — Is the proposed rule consistent with other rules and statutes?
☐ Federal Preemption — Does the proposed rule conflict with federal law?
☐ Economic Impact — Are costs reasonable relative to the regulatory benefit?
☐ Small Business Impact — Has the agency minimized the burden on small businesses?
☐ Five-Year Review — If applicable, has the rule been adequately reviewed for continued necessity?
☐ Enforceability — Are compliance obligations practical and enforceable?
☐ Effective Date — Is the implementation timeline reasonable?
☐ Recordkeeping — Are reporting and documentation requirements reasonable?
OHIO RULEMAKING PROCESS OVERVIEW
- Proposal — Agency files proposed rule, fiscal analysis, and rule summary with Secretary of State, JCARR, and LSC; published in Register of Ohio
- Common Sense Initiative (CSI) Review — For rules with business impact, agency submits to CSI for review before filing
- Public Comment Period — Typically 30 days; agency sets the specific deadline
- Public Hearing — Required between 31 and 40 days after filing with JCARR
- JCARR Review — JCARR has 65 days of jurisdiction from original filing (or 30 days from refiling) to review and potentially recommend invalidation
- Agency Adoption — Agency files final rule with LSC for codification in the Ohio Administrative Code
- Five-Year Review — All rules must be reviewed every 5 years under ORC § 119.032; agencies must determine whether to continue, amend, or rescind each rule
- Effective Date — Rule takes effect 10 days after filing the final rule (unless a different effective date is specified by statute)
SOURCES AND REFERENCES
- Ohio Administrative Procedure Act: ORC Chapter 119
- Rulemaking Procedures: ORC § 119.03
- Five-Year Rule Review: ORC § 119.032
- Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review (JCARR): ORC §§ 106.021-106.031
- Register of Ohio: https://www.registerofohio.state.oh.us/
- Ohio Administrative Code: https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-administrative-code
- JCARR: https://www.jcarr.state.oh.us/
- RuleWatch Ohio: https://www.rulewatchohio.gov/
This template is provided by ezel.ai for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be used without review by a qualified attorney licensed in Ohio.
About This Template
Administrative law covers how you interact with government agencies, from filing a comment on a proposed rule to appealing a denied license or benefit. Agency processes have their own forms, deadlines, and evidence standards that are different from what courts use. Getting the paperwork wrong usually means missing a deadline or losing the right to appeal, so precision in these documents matters as much as it does in a courtroom filing.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: March 2026