APA Comment Letter (General)
PUBLIC COMMENT ON PROPOSED RULEMAKING
NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT — N.J.S.A. 52:14B-4
RULEMAKING INFORMATION
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Governing Statute | N.J.S.A. 52:14B-4 (New Jersey Administrative Procedure Act) |
| Publication | New Jersey Register (biweekly, published 1st and 3rd Mondays) |
| Standard Comment Period | 30 days from date of publication in the New Jersey Register |
| Extended Comment Period | Additional 30 days if sufficient public interest is demonstrated within the first 30 days |
| Public Hearing | Required upon request of a legislative committee, governmental agency, or if sufficient public interest is shown (within 30 days of publication) |
| Submission Methods | As directed by the agency in the notice of proposal |
| Expiration of Proposed Rules | Proposed rules expire if not adopted within one year of publication (N.J.S.A. 52:14B-4.12) |
COMMENT LETTER
Date: [__/__/____]
Via: ☐ U.S. Mail ☐ Email ☐ Electronic submission portal ☐ Hand delivery ☐ Facsimile
[Agency Name]
[________________________________]
Attn: [________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________]
[City, State ZIP]
Email (if applicable): [________________________________]
Re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
- New Jersey Register Citation: [____] N.J.R. [________________________________]
- Publication Date: [__/__/____]
- Proposal Number: PRN [________________________________]
- New Jersey Administrative Code Citation: N.J.A.C. [________________________________]
- Proposed Rule Title: [________________________________]
- Comment Deadline: [__/__/____]
Dear [________________________________] (Agency Contact / Rulemaking Officer):
I. IDENTIFICATION OF COMMENTER
-
The following comment is submitted by [________________________________] ("Commenter") regarding the above-referenced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published in the New Jersey Register on [__/__/____].
-
Commenter is a ☐ individual / ☐ business entity / ☐ trade or professional association / ☐ nonprofit organization / ☐ governmental entity / ☐ law firm / ☐ other: [________________________________].
-
Commenter's address is [________________________________], [________________________________], New Jersey [____].
-
Contact person: [________________________________]
- Telephone: [________________________________]
- Email: [________________________________] -
Commenter's interest in this rulemaking: [________________________________]
(Describe your relationship to the subject matter — e.g., regulated entity, industry participant, consumer advocate, affected community member, legal practitioner.)
II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF COMMENTS
- Commenter respectfully submits the following principal comments and recommendations regarding the proposed rule:
a. Comment 1: [________________________________]
b. Comment 2: [________________________________]
c. Comment 3: [________________________________]
d. Comment 4: [________________________________]
III. DETAILED COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS
A. Comment on Proposed N.J.A.C. [________________________________]
-
Proposed Rule Text (Section/Subsection): [________________________________]
-
Specific Concern: [________________________________]
(Describe the specific provision of the proposed rule that is the subject of this comment. Identify the section number, subsection, and relevant language. Explain the concern clearly.)
- Legal Authority Analysis:
a. The proposed rule ☐ exceeds / ☐ is consistent with / ☐ is in tension with the Agency's statutory authority under [________________________________] (cite enabling statute).
b. The proposed rule ☐ is consistent with / ☐ conflicts with existing rules at N.J.A.C. [________________________________].
c. Relevant case law: [________________________________]
- Impact Analysis:
a. Economic impact: [________________________________]
b. Regulatory burden: [________________________________]
c. Impact on small businesses: [________________________________] (Note: N.J.S.A. 52:14B-19 through 52:14B-25 require agencies to consider the impact on small businesses and minimize compliance burdens where feasible.)
d. Impact on jobs: [________________________________] (Note: Executive Order No. 2 (2010) requires agencies to assess the impact of proposed rules on job creation and retention.)
- Recommended Change: [________________________________]
(Provide specific alternative language, modifications, or deletion of the provision. Be as precise as possible.)
- Supporting Data/Evidence: [________________________________]
B. Comment on Proposed N.J.A.C. [________________________________]
-
Proposed Rule Text: [________________________________]
-
Specific Concern: [________________________________]
-
Legal Authority Analysis: [________________________________]
-
Impact Analysis: [________________________________]
-
Recommended Change: [________________________________]
-
Supporting Data/Evidence: [________________________________]
C. Comment on Proposed N.J.A.C. [________________________________]
-
Proposed Rule Text: [________________________________]
-
Specific Concern: [________________________________]
-
Legal Authority Analysis: [________________________________]
-
Impact Analysis: [________________________________]
-
Recommended Change: [________________________________]
-
Supporting Data/Evidence: [________________________________]
IV. PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE RULE LANGUAGE (IF APPLICABLE)
- Commenter proposes the following alternative language for the provisions identified above:
Current Proposed Language:
[________________________________]
Commenter's Recommended Language:
[________________________________]
Explanation of Changes: [________________________________]
V. REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY AND SMALL BUSINESS IMPACT
- Pursuant to the New Jersey Regulatory Flexibility Act (N.J.S.A. 52:14B-16 et seq.), Commenter requests that the Agency consider:
a. ☐ The proposed rule imposes disproportionate compliance costs on small businesses (as defined in N.J.S.A. 52:14B-17)
b. ☐ Less burdensome alternatives exist that would achieve the regulatory objective: [________________________________]
c. ☐ Extended compliance timelines should be provided for small businesses: [________________________________]
d. ☐ Simplified reporting or recordkeeping requirements should be adopted for small businesses: [________________________________]
VI. ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT REVIEW
- Commenter provides the following comments on the Agency's Economic Impact Statement:
a. ☐ The Agency's cost estimates are accurate
b. ☐ The Agency's cost estimates understate the actual costs because: [________________________________]
c. ☐ The Agency failed to account for the following costs: [________________________________]
d. ☐ The benefits identified by the Agency are overstated because: [________________________________]
e. ☐ Additional data regarding economic impact: [________________________________]
VII. REQUEST FOR PUBLIC HEARING
- ☐ Commenter requests that the Agency hold a public hearing on the proposed rule pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:14B-4(a)(3).
Justification: [________________________________]
- ☐ Commenter requests an extension of the comment period pursuant to N.J.S.A. 52:14B-4(a)(3).
Justification: [________________________________]
VIII. CONCLUSION
- For the foregoing reasons, Commenter respectfully requests that the Agency:
a. ☐ Withdraw the proposed rule in its entirety
b. ☐ Adopt the proposed rule with the modifications recommended herein
c. ☐ Repropose the rule with substantive changes and provide a new comment period
d. ☐ Extend the comment period to allow for additional public input
e. ☐ Hold a public hearing before adopting the rule
f. ☐ Other: [________________________________]
- Commenter appreciates the opportunity to participate in this rulemaking and is available to provide additional information, data, or testimony in support of these comments.
Respectfully submitted,
________________________________________
[Name]
[Title]
[Organization]
[Address Line 1]
[Address Line 2]
[City, State ZIP]
[Telephone]
[Email]
Date: [__/__/____]
COMMENT PREPARATION CHECKLIST
☐ Identify the proposed rule in the New Jersey Register by citation and PRN number
☐ Verify the comment deadline (30 days from publication date)
☐ Obtain and review the full text of the proposed rule at N.J.A.C. [________________________________]
☐ Review the Agency's notice of proposal, including the summary, social impact statement, economic impact statement, and regulatory flexibility analysis
☐ Identify all sections of the proposed rule that affect your interests
☐ Research the Agency's statutory authority and any relevant case law
☐ Gather supporting data, economic analyses, and expert opinions
☐ Draft specific recommended changes with alternative rule language where possible
☐ Review comments for accuracy, completeness, and professionalism
☐ Confirm the correct submission method (mail, email, electronic portal)
☐ Retain a copy of the submitted comment and proof of delivery
☐ Calendar the close of the comment period and any public hearing dates
COMMON ISSUES CHECKLIST
Review the proposed rule for the following common concerns:
☐ Statutory Authority — Does the Agency have authority to adopt the proposed rule under its enabling statute?
☐ Legislative Intent — Is the proposed rule consistent with the intent of the authorizing legislation?
☐ Constitutional Issues — Does the proposed rule raise due process, equal protection, or other constitutional concerns?
☐ Vagueness — Are the terms and requirements of the proposed rule sufficiently clear and definite?
☐ Consistency — Is the proposed rule consistent with other existing rules and regulations?
☐ Federal Preemption — Does the proposed rule conflict with federal law or regulations?
☐ Economic Impact — Are the costs of compliance reasonable in proportion to the regulatory benefit?
☐ Small Business Impact — Does the proposed rule adequately minimize the burden on small businesses per the Regulatory Flexibility Act?
☐ Enforceability — Are the compliance obligations clear and practically enforceable?
☐ Effective Date — Is the proposed effective date reasonable for compliance preparation?
☐ Transition Provisions — Are adequate transition or phase-in provisions included?
☐ Recordkeeping — Are reporting and recordkeeping requirements reasonable?
NEW JERSEY RULEMAKING PROCESS OVERVIEW
- Notice of Proposal — Agency publishes in the New Jersey Register
- Public Comment Period — Minimum 30 days; can be extended 30 days if sufficient public interest
- Public Hearing — Required upon request by legislative committee, governmental body, or showing of sufficient public interest
- Agency Response — Agency must prepare a summary of public comments and its responses
- Notice of Adoption — Published in the New Jersey Register; rule takes effect upon publication
- Substantial Changes — If substantial changes are made from the proposal, the Agency must republish with a new 60-day comment period
- Expiration — Proposed rules not adopted within one year expire automatically (N.J.S.A. 52:14B-4.12)
SOURCES AND REFERENCES
- New Jersey Administrative Procedure Act: N.J.S.A. 52:14B-1 et seq.
- Rulemaking Procedures: N.J.S.A. 52:14B-4
- Regulatory Flexibility Act: N.J.S.A. 52:14B-16 through 52:14B-25
- New Jersey Register: https://www.nj.gov/oal/rules/
- Office of Administrative Law: https://www.nj.gov/oal/
- New Jersey Administrative Code: https://www.nj.gov/oal/rules/accessnj/
This template is provided by ezel.ai for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be used without review by a qualified attorney licensed in New Jersey.
About This Template
Administrative law covers how you interact with government agencies, from filing a comment on a proposed rule to appealing a denied license or benefit. Agency processes have their own forms, deadlines, and evidence standards that are different from what courts use. Getting the paperwork wrong usually means missing a deadline or losing the right to appeal, so precision in these documents matters as much as it does in a courtroom filing.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: March 2026