Answer to Debt Collection Lawsuit (with FDCPA Affirmative Defenses) - Illinois
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE [____________] JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
[____________] COUNTY, ILLINOIS
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| [PLAINTIFF NAME], | Plaintiff |
| v. | |
| [DEFENDANT NAME], | Defendant |
Case No. [____________]
DEFENDANT'S ANSWER AND FACT-SPECIFIC AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
1. FILING GATE
A. Read the summons and orders
Amount demanded, excluding interest and costs: $[____________]
Case designation on the summons: [SMALL CLAIM / LAW / MUNICIPAL / OTHER]
Appearance or response date stated on summons: [DATE]
Written-answer order, local rule, or notice: [CITATION / DATE / NONE]
☐ Small claim: The action is based on tort or contract and seeks no more than $10,000, excluding interest and costs. Under Rules 101 and 286(a), do not file this answer unless the summons, notice, local rule, or court order requires it. Appear as directed.
☐ Other 30-day summons: Rule 101(d) applies, and the summons requires an answer or appearance within 30 days after service, excluding the day of service.
☐ Different route: [IDENTIFY THE CONTROLLING SUMMONS, STATUTE, RULE, OR ORDER]
B. Preserve threshold objections before filing
☐ Personal jurisdiction, process, and service have been reviewed under 735 ILCS 5/2-301.
☐ No motion to dismiss or quash under Section 2-301 will be filed.
☐ A Section 2-301 motion was filed on [DATE] and resolved on [DATE / PENDING].
C. Rule 137 review
☐ Every denial and defense below has been investigated.
☐ Every selected defense states supporting facts, not only a label.
☐ Unsupported, inconsistent, or inapplicable options have been deleted.
2. PARTIES AND CLAIM SNAPSHOT
Defendant, [NAME], answers the complaint of [PLAINTIFF] as follows.
| Issue | Entry |
|---|---|
| Original creditor | [NAME / UNKNOWN] |
| Plaintiff's claimed status | [ORIGINAL CREDITOR / ASSIGNEE / DEBT BUYER / OTHER] |
| Account ending | [LAST FOUR / SAFE IDENTIFIER] |
| Contract or account type | [TYPE] |
| Principal claimed | $[AMOUNT] |
| Interest claimed | $[AMOUNT AND RATE] |
| Fees or costs claimed | $[AMOUNT AND BASIS] |
| Last payment or transaction alleged | [DATE / DISPUTED] |
| Charge-off date alleged | [DATE / NOT ALLEGED] |
| Complaint filing date | [DATE] |
| Service date and method | [DATE AND METHOD] |
3. RESPONSES TO EACH ALLEGATION
Paragraph [1]
Allegation summarized or quoted: [TEXT]
☐ Admitted.
☐ Denied. The facts supporting the denial are: [FACTS]
☐ Defendant lacks knowledge sufficient to form a belief and therefore denies the allegation. The required affidavit is attached.
Paragraph [2]
Allegation summarized or quoted: [TEXT]
☐ Admitted.
☐ Denied. The facts supporting the denial are: [FACTS]
☐ Defendant lacks knowledge sufficient to form a belief and therefore denies the allegation. The required affidavit is attached.
Paragraph [3]
Allegation summarized or quoted: [TEXT]
☐ Admitted.
☐ Denied. The facts supporting the denial are: [FACTS]
☐ Defendant lacks knowledge sufficient to form a belief and therefore denies the allegation. The required affidavit is attached.
Paragraph [____]
Allegation summarized or quoted: [TEXT]
☐ Admitted.
☐ Denied. The facts supporting the denial are: [FACTS]
☐ Defendant lacks knowledge sufficient to form a belief and therefore denies the allegation. The required affidavit is attached.
4. WRITTEN-INSTRUMENT AND DEBT-BUYER CHECK
A. Complaint materials
☐ The claim is founded on a written instrument, and the relevant instrument is attached or recited as required by 735 ILCS 5/2-606.
☐ The complaint includes an affidavit explaining why the written instrument is inaccessible.
☐ Neither is present. The specific omission is: [FACTS]
B. Rule 280 applicability and compliance
☐ The complaint contains a credit-card claim.
☐ The complaint is a debt buyer's action to collect consumer debt.
☐ Neither; Rules 280 through 280.5 do not apply on the present facts.
For a covered action, identify:
| Rule 280.2 item | Present? | Location or defect |
|---|---|---|
| Credit Card or Debt Buyer Collection Affidavit | [YES / NO] | [PAGE / DEFECT] |
| Written contract or qualifying account document | [YES / NO] | [PAGE / DEFECT] |
| Statement that suit is within a relevant limitations period | [YES / NO] | [PAGE / DEFECT] |
| Affidavit signed by plaintiff or designated agent, not plaintiff's attorney | [YES / NO] | [PAGE / DEFECT] |
☐ Defendant requests the relief authorized by current Rule 280.4 for proven noncompliance.
C. Execution or assignment denial
☐ Defendant admits executing the identified instrument.
☐ Defendant denies executing the identified instrument and attaches a verification complying with 735 ILCS 5/2-605(b).
☐ Defendant admits the identified assignment.
☐ Defendant, who is not the alleged assignor, denies the identified assignment on information and belief and attaches a verification complying with 735 ILCS 5/2-605(b).
5. DISPUTED ELEMENTS AND PROOF ISSUES
Defendant specifically disputes the following allegation or proof issue:
☐ Formation, acceptance, or enforceable terms: [FACTS]
☐ Plaintiff's ownership of Defendant's account: [FACTS AND MISSING LINK]
☐ Account identification or attribution to Defendant: [FACTS]
☐ Principal, interest, fee, credit, or payment calculation: [FACTS AND AMOUNT]
☐ Occurrence or date of default: [FACTS]
☐ Satisfaction of a condition precedent alleged by Plaintiff: [FACTS]
☐ Other disputed element: [ELEMENT AND FACTS]
6. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Without shifting any burden not imposed by law, Defendant states only the following fact-supported defenses.
Defense 1 — Limitations
☐ Selected.
Claim classification: [WRITTEN CONTRACT / UNWRITTEN CONTRACT / SALE OF GOODS / OTHER]
Controlling limitations authority: [CURRENT CITATION]
Accrual date and supporting facts: [DATE AND FACTS]
Tolling, revival, payment, promise, or other timing issue: [FACTS / NONE]
Why the filing date is untimely: [CALCULATION]
Defense 2 — Payment, release, satisfaction, settlement, or discharge
☐ Selected ground: [GROUND]
Supporting dates, amounts, documents, and persons: [FACTS]
Defense 3 — Identity theft or mistaken identity
☐ Defendant did not incur or authorize the consumer debt because: [FACTS]
☐ Rule 280.5 applies. The Attorney General Identity Theft Affidavit was served on [DATE].
☐ The Supreme Court Identity Theft Affidavit for a credit-card or debt-buyer action was served and filed on [DATE].
Defense 4 — Other affirmative matter
Legal ground and current authority: [GROUND AND CITATION]
Facts supporting every element: [FACTS]
How those facts avoid or defeat the claim: [EXPLANATION]
7. FDCPA ISSUE SCREEN
☐ A communication before the formal pleading is at issue: [DATE, SENDER, RECIPIENT, CONTENT]
☐ Defendant sent a written dispute or original-creditor request during the applicable validation period on [DATE].
☐ Collection activity continued before the verification, judgment copy, or original-creditor information required by Section 1692g(b) was mailed: [FACTS]
☐ Counsel determined that the relevant actor, debt, consumer, and conduct fall within the FDCPA: [ANALYSIS]
☐ Any FDCPA counterclaim is stated in a separate, complete counterclaim complying with the applicable pleading and jurisdiction rules.
☐ No FDCPA claim or defense is asserted in this answer.
8. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
Defendant requests that the Court:
- deny relief on allegations Plaintiff does not prove;
- enter judgment for Defendant on each established defense;
- grant any relief properly requested under Rule 280.4;
- award only costs or other relief authorized by controlling law; and
- grant other proper relief supported by the pleadings and record.
9. JURY DEMAND
☐ Regular civil route: Defendant demands a jury and files this demand no later than the answer under 735 ILCS 5/2-1105(a).
☐ Small-claims route: Defendant demands a jury no later than the required appearance date under Rule 285 and selects ☐ 6 jurors / ☐ 12 jurors, subject to the current fee requirement.
☐ Defendant does not demand a jury.
10. SIGNATURE
Respectfully submitted,
[DEFENDANT NAME]
By: /s/ [NAME]
☐ Defendant, self-represented
☐ Attorney for Defendant, ARDC No. [NUMBER]
Address: [ADDRESS]
Telephone: [NUMBER]
Email: [EMAIL]
Date: [DATE]
11. AFFIDAVIT OR VERIFICATION ATTACHMENT
I, [NAME], state under oath:
- I am the Defendant and have personal knowledge of the facts stated here, except matters expressly stated on information and belief.
- After reasonable inquiry, I lack knowledge sufficient to form a belief about Complaint paragraphs [NUMBERS], and the lack-of-knowledge statements in the Answer are true.
- I deny that I executed the written instrument identified as [DOCUMENT] because [FACTS].
- I am not the person alleged to have made the assignment identified as [DOCUMENT]. On information and belief, I deny that assignment because [FACTS].
Further affiant sayeth not.
Signature: [____________________________]
Date: [DATE]
Subscribed and sworn before me on [DATE].
Notary or authorized officer: [____________________________]
12. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on [DATE], I served this Answer and every attachment on each required recipient using [METHOD AUTHORIZED BY CURRENT RULE, ORDER, OR E-FILING SYSTEM].
| Recipient | Address or service contact | Method | Proof or confirmation |
|---|---|---|---|
| [NAME] | [ADDRESS / EMAIL / E-FILE CONTACT] | [METHOD] | [DETAILS] |
Signature: [____________________________]
Sources and References
- Illinois General Assembly, Code of Civil Procedure, Part 3: https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ILCS/details?MajorTopic=RIGHTS%20AND%20REMEDIES&Chapter=CIVIL%20PROCEDURE&ActName=Code%20of%20Civil%20Procedure.&ActID=2017&ChapterID=56&ChapAct=735+ILCS+5%2F&SeqStart=4100000&SeqEnd=4300000&Print=True
- Illinois General Assembly, Code of Civil Procedure, Part 6: https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ILCS/details?MajorTopic=&Chapter=&ActName=Code%20of%20Civil%20Procedure.&ActID=2017&ChapterID=56&ChapAct=735+ILCS+5%2F&SeqStart=6400000&SeqEnd=9100000&Print=True
- Illinois General Assembly, Code of Civil Procedure, Part 11: https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ILCS/details?MajorTopic=&Chapter=&ActName=Code%20of%20Civil%20Procedure.&ActID=2017&ChapterID=56&ChapAct=735+ILCS+5%2F&SeqStart=12700000&SeqEnd=15200000&Print=True
- Illinois Courts, current Supreme Court Rules: https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/rules-law/supreme-court-rules/
- Office of the Law Revision Counsel, 15 U.S.C. § 1692g: https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:15%20section:1692g%20edition:prelim)
About this template
- Last updated
- August 22, 2026
- Citations checked
- August 22, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Illinois
- Category
- Consumer Protection
Legal authority
- 735 ILCS 5/2-301(a), (a-6) (personal-jurisdiction objection and prospective waiver)
- 735 ILCS 5/2-605(b) (verified denial of execution or assignment of a written instrument)
- 735 ILCS 5/2-606 (written-instrument exhibit requirement)
- 735 ILCS 5/2-610(a)-(c) (specific admissions and denials)
- 735 ILCS 5/2-613(d) (facts supporting affirmative defenses)
- 735 ILCS 5/2-1105(a) (defendant jury-demand timing)
- Illinois Supreme Court Rules 101 and 286(a) (small-claims answer and appearance route)
- Illinois Supreme Court Rule 137(a) (signature certification and sanctions)
- Illinois Supreme Court Rules 280, 280.2, and 280.4 (credit-card and debt-buyer complaints)
- Illinois Supreme Court Rule 280.5 (identity-theft affidavits and dismissal route)
- Illinois Supreme Court Rules 281 and 285 (small-claim definition and jury demand)
- 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(b)-(d) (timely written dispute and formal-pleading limitation)
Consumer protection law gives buyers, borrowers, and renters rights against unfair, deceptive, or abusive business practices. Federal and state laws cover debt collection, credit reporting, product warranties, lemon cars, and more, and most of them have strict deadlines to preserve your rights. A well-drafted demand or complaint puts the business on notice, triggers their legal obligations, and often resolves the issue without a lawsuit.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
A reviewer verified this template's legal citations against the official source on August 22, 2026.
735 ILCS 5/2-301(a), (a-6) (checked August 22, 2026): "Prior to filing another pleading or motion, subject to the listed exceptions, a party may object to personal jurisdiction, insufficiency of process, or insufficiency of service by a motion to dismiss or quash. A party that files another pleading or motion first prospectively waives those objections unless the initial filing is one of the subsection's stated exceptions."
735 ILCS 5/2-605(b) (checked August 22, 2026): "The allegation of the execution or assignment of any written instrument is admitted unless denied in a pleading verified by oath, except where verification is excused by the court; a party who is not the alleged signer or assignor may deny on information and belief."
735 ILCS 5/2-606 (checked August 22, 2026): "If a claim or defense is founded upon a written instrument, a copy of the relevant instrument must be attached to the pleading or recited in it unless the pleader attaches an affidavit stating facts showing that the instrument is inaccessible."
735 ILCS 5/2-610(a)-(c) (checked August 22, 2026): "Every answer must explicitly admit or deny each allegation. Except for damages allegations, an allegation not explicitly denied is admitted unless the pleader states insufficient knowledge and attaches an affidavit of the truth of that statement or had no opportunity to deny; denials must fairly answer the substance."
Draft your Answer to Debt Collection Lawsuit (with FDCPA Affirmative Defenses) - Illinois in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.