AI SYSTEM AUDIT ENGAGEMENT LETTER
DATE: [DATE]
ENGAGEMENT NUMBER: [ENGAGEMENT-NUMBER]
FROM (AUDITOR):
[AUDITOR FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY, STATE/PROVINCE, POSTAL CODE, COUNTRY]
Contact: [NAME]
Email: [EMAIL]
Phone: [PHONE]
TO (CLIENT):
[CLIENT ORGANIZATION NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[CITY, STATE/PROVINCE, POSTAL CODE, COUNTRY]
Attention: [NAME, TITLE]
Email: [EMAIL]
RE: AI System Audit Engagement
Dear [NAME]:
This letter confirms the terms of our engagement to perform an audit of your artificial intelligence system(s) as described herein. Please review this letter carefully and indicate your acceptance by signing below.
1. ENGAGEMENT OVERVIEW
1.1 Purpose
[AUDITOR FIRM NAME] ("Auditor," "we," "us") will perform an independent audit of the artificial intelligence system(s) identified below ("AI System" or "System") owned and/or operated by [CLIENT ORGANIZATION NAME] ("Client," "you").
The purpose of this audit is to:
☐ Assess compliance with applicable AI regulations
☐ Evaluate algorithmic fairness and bias
☐ Review AI governance and documentation practices
☐ Assess security and privacy controls
☐ Evaluate model performance and accuracy
☐ Review human oversight mechanisms
☐ Assess training data practices
☐ Conduct pre-deployment conformity assessment
☐ Fulfill regulatory audit requirements
☐ Other: [SPECIFY]
1.2 AI System(s) in Scope
| System Name | Description | Risk Classification |
|---|---|---|
| [SYSTEM 1] | [DESCRIPTION] | ☐ High ☐ Limited ☐ Minimal |
| [SYSTEM 2] | [DESCRIPTION] | ☐ High ☐ Limited ☐ Minimal |
1.3 Engagement Period
- Engagement Start Date: [DATE]
- Fieldwork Period: [START DATE] to [END DATE]
- Draft Report Due: [DATE]
- Final Report Due: [DATE]
2. SCOPE OF AUDIT
2.1 Audit Components
This engagement will include the following components:
Regulatory Compliance Assessment
☐ EU AI Act Compliance
- Classification of AI System under EU AI Act risk categories
- Assessment of conformity with applicable requirements
- Review of technical documentation
- Evaluation of quality management system
- Assessment of human oversight mechanisms
- Review of transparency and disclosure practices
☐ US State Law Compliance
- Colorado AI Act requirements assessment
- California AI transparency law compliance
- Illinois employment AI law compliance
- NYC Local Law 144 compliance (if employment-related)
- Other applicable state laws: [SPECIFY]
☐ Sector-Specific Compliance
- [SPECIFY REGULATIONS: HIPAA, GLBA, FINRA, FDA, etc.]
Algorithmic Fairness and Bias Audit
☐ Bias Assessment
- Analysis of model outputs across demographic groups
- Calculation of fairness metrics (demographic parity, equalized odds, etc.)
- Assessment of disparate impact
- Review of protected class proxies
- Evaluation of bias mitigation measures
☐ Fairness Testing
- Testing with representative datasets
- Evaluation of edge cases and subgroup performance
- Analysis of intersectional fairness
- Documentation of fairness methodology and results
Technical Assessment
☐ Model Documentation Review
- Review of model cards and technical documentation
- Assessment of development lifecycle documentation
- Evaluation of training data documentation
- Review of validation and testing records
☐ Performance Evaluation
- Verification of stated accuracy metrics
- Assessment of model robustness
- Evaluation of error handling
- Review of performance monitoring mechanisms
☐ Training Data Assessment
- Review of data sources and provenance
- Assessment of data quality controls
- Evaluation of data representativeness
- Review of consent and rights documentation
Governance Assessment
☐ AI Governance Review
- Assessment of governance structures
- Review of policies and procedures
- Evaluation of roles and responsibilities
- Assessment of documentation practices
☐ Human Oversight Assessment
- Evaluation of human-in-the-loop mechanisms
- Assessment of override capabilities
- Review of escalation procedures
- Evaluation of training and competency
☐ Risk Management Review
- Assessment of risk identification processes
- Evaluation of risk mitigation measures
- Review of incident response procedures
- Assessment of monitoring and alerting
Security and Privacy Assessment
☐ Security Review
- Assessment of access controls
- Evaluation of data protection measures
- Review of adversarial attack protections
- Assessment of logging and audit trails
☐ Privacy Review
- Evaluation of privacy impact assessments
- Assessment of data minimization practices
- Review of consent mechanisms
- Assessment of data subject rights procedures
2.2 Audit Standards and Frameworks
This audit will be conducted in accordance with:
☐ IEEE 7003-2024 Standard for Algorithmic Bias Considerations
☐ ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System Requirements
☐ NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF)
☐ EU AI Act requirements (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)
☐ ISACA AI Audit Framework
☐ AICPA SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (for security aspects)
☐ [OTHER STANDARDS: SPECIFY]
2.3 Out of Scope
The following items are explicitly excluded from this engagement:
☐ AI systems not listed in Section 1.2
☐ Legal interpretation or legal advice
☐ Penetration testing (unless specifically included)
☐ Source code review (unless specifically included)
☐ Redesign or remediation of systems
☐ Ongoing monitoring services
☐ [OTHER EXCLUSIONS]
3. AUDIT METHODOLOGY
3.1 Approach
Our audit methodology will include:
Phase 1: Planning and Information Gathering
- Review of documentation and policies
- Interviews with key stakeholders
- Understanding of system architecture and data flows
- Development of detailed audit plan
Phase 2: Testing and Assessment
- Technical testing of AI systems
- Analysis of model outputs and fairness metrics
- Review of controls and procedures
- Evaluation of compliance with requirements
Phase 3: Analysis and Reporting
- Analysis of findings
- Development of recommendations
- Preparation of draft report
- Discussion of findings with Client
- Issuance of final report
3.2 Testing Methodology
For bias and fairness testing, we will:
☐ Use Client-provided test datasets
☐ Develop independent test datasets
☐ Use both Client-provided and independent datasets
☐ Apply [SPECIFY TESTING METHODOLOGY]
Testing will assess:
| Fairness Metric | Protected Attributes Tested |
|---|---|
| Demographic Parity | [ATTRIBUTES] |
| Equalized Odds | [ATTRIBUTES] |
| Disparate Impact Ratio | [ATTRIBUTES] |
| Individual Fairness | [ATTRIBUTES] |
| [OTHER METRICS] | [ATTRIBUTES] |
3.3 Sampling
Where complete testing is not feasible, we will employ:
- Statistical sampling methods
- Risk-based sampling approaches
- Sample sizes sufficient for meaningful conclusions
Sampling methodology will be documented in our workpapers.
4. CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1 Access and Cooperation
Client agrees to provide:
☐ Access to AI system(s) and development environments
☐ Access to training data and test datasets
☐ Model documentation and technical specifications
☐ Governance policies and procedures
☐ Prior audit reports and assessments
☐ Access to relevant personnel for interviews
☐ Responses to information requests within [DAYS] business days
☐ Designated point of contact for the engagement
☐ Test environment access (if applicable)
☐ API access for automated testing (if applicable)
4.2 Information Request
Please provide the following documentation within [DAYS] of engagement acceptance:
System Documentation:
☐ System architecture diagrams
☐ Model cards or technical documentation
☐ Training data documentation
☐ Validation and testing records
☐ Performance metrics and monitoring data
Governance Documentation:
☐ AI policies and procedures
☐ Risk assessments
☐ Impact assessments
☐ Governance committee records
☐ Incident reports
Compliance Documentation:
☐ Regulatory filings and disclosures
☐ Previous audit reports
☐ Remediation plans and status
4.3 Personnel Availability
Client will make the following personnel available for interviews:
| Role | Estimated Time |
|---|---|
| AI System Owner | [HOURS] |
| Data Scientists/ML Engineers | [HOURS] |
| Privacy/Compliance Officer | [HOURS] |
| IT Security | [HOURS] |
| Legal Counsel | [HOURS] |
| Business Stakeholders | [HOURS] |
4.4 Representations
Client represents that:
- Information provided to Auditor will be accurate and complete
- Client will promptly notify Auditor of any material changes
- Client has authority to engage Auditor for this purpose
- Client will not interfere with audit activities
5. DELIVERABLES
5.1 Audit Report
Upon completion of the audit, Auditor will deliver:
Executive Summary Report including:
- Audit objectives and scope
- Summary of methodology
- Key findings and risk ratings
- Summary of recommendations
- Overall assessment/opinion
Detailed Technical Report including:
- Detailed findings with supporting evidence
- Regulatory compliance assessment
- Bias and fairness analysis results
- Technical assessment results
- Governance assessment results
- Prioritized recommendations
- Remediation guidance
5.2 Supporting Materials
☐ Fairness testing results and methodology
☐ Compliance checklist/matrix
☐ Risk rating matrix
☐ Remediation roadmap
☐ Presentation to management/board
☐ Attestation letter (if applicable)
☐ Certification statement (if applicable)
5.3 Report Ratings
Findings will be rated using the following scale:
| Rating | Description |
|---|---|
| Critical | Immediate action required; significant regulatory or harm risk |
| High | Prompt action required; material compliance or operational risk |
| Medium | Action required; moderate risk requiring timely remediation |
| Low | Improvement opportunity; minor risk |
| Observation | Best practice recommendation |
5.4 Draft Report Review
- Draft report will be provided to Client by [DATE]
- Client will have [DAYS] to review and provide feedback
- Auditor will consider Client feedback and factual corrections
- Final report will be issued within [DAYS] of receiving Client feedback
6. FEES AND EXPENSES
6.1 Professional Fees
| Component | Fee |
|---|---|
| Fixed Fee for Engagement | $[AMOUNT] |
| OR Estimated Fee Range | $[MIN] - $[MAX] |
| OR Hourly Rates | See Schedule A |
☐ Fixed Fee Engagement: Total fee of $[AMOUNT] payable as follows:
- [%] upon engagement acceptance
- [%] upon completion of fieldwork
- [%] upon delivery of final report
☐ Time and Materials: Billed at standard hourly rates:
- Partner: $[RATE]/hour
- Senior Manager: $[RATE]/hour
- Manager: $[RATE]/hour
- Senior Associate: $[RATE]/hour
- Associate: $[RATE]/hour
Estimated total: $[AMOUNT] (actual fees may vary)
6.2 Expenses
Reasonable out-of-pocket expenses will be billed at cost:
☐ Travel expenses (if on-site work required)
☐ Specialized tools or software licensing
☐ Third-party data or testing services
Estimated expenses: $[AMOUNT]
Expenses exceeding $[THRESHOLD] require prior approval.
6.3 Payment Terms
- Invoices due within [NUMBER] days of receipt
- Late payments subject to [%] monthly interest
- Client responsible for applicable taxes
6.4 Additional Services
Services beyond the scope of this engagement will be subject to separate agreement or change order.
7. CONFIDENTIALITY
7.1 Confidential Information
Auditor agrees to maintain the confidentiality of all non-public information received from Client in connection with this engagement ("Confidential Information").
7.2 Use of Information
Auditor will use Confidential Information solely for purposes of performing this engagement and will not disclose it to third parties except:
- To Auditor's personnel who need to know
- As required by law or professional standards
- With Client's prior written consent
7.3 Security Measures
Auditor will implement appropriate security measures to protect Confidential Information, including:
- Access controls and encryption
- Secure storage and transmission
- Employee confidentiality obligations
- Secure disposal upon engagement completion
7.4 Return/Destruction
Upon engagement completion or Client request, Auditor will return or securely destroy Confidential Information, except for workpapers retained per professional standards.
7.5 Duration
Confidentiality obligations survive termination for [NUMBER] years.
8. INDEPENDENCE AND OBJECTIVITY
8.1 Independence Statement
Auditor represents that:
- Auditor is independent of Client
- No conflicts of interest exist that would impair objectivity
- Auditor has no financial interest in Client or the AI System
- Auditor will disclose any relationships that could affect independence
8.2 Limitations
Auditor has not previously provided:
☐ Design or development services for the AI System
☐ Other services that would impair independence
☐ Services creating self-review threat
If applicable, potential independence concerns and safeguards:
[DESCRIBE ANY CONCERNS AND SAFEGUARDS]
9. LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS
9.1 Scope Limitations
Client acknowledges that:
- This audit is limited to the scope described herein
- Audit procedures may not detect all issues
- Findings are based on information provided and point-in-time testing
- AI systems may change after the audit
- This audit does not guarantee regulatory compliance
9.2 No Legal Advice
This engagement does not constitute legal advice. Client should consult legal counsel regarding legal obligations and interpretations.
9.3 Report Use
- The audit report is prepared solely for Client's use
- Report may not be shared with third parties without Auditor consent
- Auditor accepts no liability to third parties
☐ Exception: Report may be shared with:
- [REGULATORS, IF APPLICABLE]
- [BOARD OF DIRECTORS]
- [OTHER AUTHORIZED PARTIES]
9.4 Limitation of Liability
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW:
- Auditor's liability is limited to fees paid for this engagement
- Auditor is not liable for indirect, consequential, or punitive damages
- Auditor is not liable for Client's decisions based on report
10. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
10.1 Quality Standards
Auditor will perform this engagement in accordance with:
- Applicable professional auditing standards
- Auditor's quality management policies
- Ethical requirements of relevant professional bodies
10.2 Team Qualifications
The engagement team includes:
| Role | Name | Qualifications |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement Partner | [NAME] | [QUALIFICATIONS] |
| Technical Lead | [NAME] | [QUALIFICATIONS] |
| Team Members | [NAMES] | [QUALIFICATIONS] |
10.3 Use of Specialists
Auditor may engage specialists in:
☐ Data science/machine learning
☐ Information security
☐ Legal/regulatory compliance
☐ Industry-specific expertise
☐ [OTHER]
11. TERM AND TERMINATION
11.1 Engagement Term
This engagement commences upon acceptance and continues until delivery of final report or earlier termination.
11.2 Termination
Either party may terminate this engagement:
- For convenience upon [DAYS] written notice
- Immediately for material breach
- If continuation would violate professional standards
11.3 Effects of Termination
Upon termination:
- Client pays for work performed through termination
- Auditor returns Confidential Information
- Auditor may retain workpapers per professional standards
- Confidentiality obligations survive
12. GENERAL TERMS
12.1 Governing Law
This engagement is governed by the laws of [JURISDICTION].
12.2 Disputes
Disputes shall be resolved by:
☐ Mediation, then arbitration in [LOCATION]
☐ Litigation in courts of [JURISDICTION]
12.3 Amendment
Changes to this engagement require written agreement.
12.4 Assignment
Neither party may assign without consent.
12.5 Entire Agreement
This letter constitutes the entire agreement for this engagement.
12.6 Survival
Sections 7 (Confidentiality), 9 (Limitations), and 12 (General) survive termination.
13. ACCEPTANCE
Please indicate your acceptance of this engagement by signing below and returning a copy to us.
We look forward to working with you on this important engagement. If you have any questions, please contact [NAME] at [EMAIL] or [PHONE].
Sincerely,
[AUDITOR FIRM NAME]
Signature: _________________________________
Name: [NAME]
Title: [TITLE]
Date: _________________________________
ACCEPTANCE BY CLIENT
[CLIENT ORGANIZATION NAME] accepts the terms of this engagement as set forth above.
Signature: _________________________________
Name: [NAME]
Title: [TITLE]
Date: _________________________________
SCHEDULE A: HOURLY RATES (IF APPLICABLE)
| Level | Rate |
|---|---|
| Partner | $[RATE]/hour |
| Senior Manager | $[RATE]/hour |
| Manager | $[RATE]/hour |
| Senior Associate | $[RATE]/hour |
| Associate | $[RATE]/hour |
SCHEDULE B: DETAILED TIMELINE
| Phase | Activity | Start | End | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kickoff and planning | [DATE] | [DATE] | Audit plan |
| 2 | Documentation review | [DATE] | [DATE] | Preliminary findings |
| 3 | Interviews | [DATE] | [DATE] | Interview notes |
| 4 | Technical testing | [DATE] | [DATE] | Test results |
| 5 | Analysis | [DATE] | [DATE] | Findings matrix |
| 6 | Draft report | [DATE] | [DATE] | Draft report |
| 7 | Client review | [DATE] | [DATE] | Client feedback |
| 8 | Final report | [DATE] | [DATE] | Final report |
SCHEDULE C: DOCUMENT REQUEST LIST
Please provide the following documents:
AI System Documentation:
☐ System architecture and design documents
☐ Model cards or model documentation
☐ Training data documentation and datasheets
☐ Validation and testing reports
☐ Performance monitoring data
☐ Incident and error logs
Governance Documentation:
☐ AI ethics policy
☐ AI governance framework
☐ Risk assessment documentation
☐ Impact assessments (bias, privacy, etc.)
☐ Approval and review records
☐ Committee meeting minutes
Compliance Documentation:
☐ Regulatory filings and disclosures
☐ Prior audit reports
☐ Remediation tracking
☐ Training records
Operational Documentation:
☐ Standard operating procedures
☐ Human oversight procedures
☐ Incident response plans
☐ Change management records
This AI System Audit Engagement Letter template is provided for informational purposes. Auditor and client should customize based on specific requirements and applicable professional standards.
Do more with Ezel
This free template is just the beginning. See how Ezel helps legal teams draft, research, and collaborate faster.
AI that drafts while you watch
Tell the AI what you need and watch your document transform in real-time. No more copy-pasting between tools or manually formatting changes.
- Natural language commands: "Add a force majeure clause"
- Context-aware suggestions based on document type
- Real-time streaming shows edits as they happen
- Milestone tracking and version comparison
Research and draft in one conversation
Ask questions, attach documents, and get answers grounded in case law. Link chats to matters so the AI remembers your context.
- Pull statutes, case law, and secondary sources
- Attach and analyze contracts mid-conversation
- Link chats to matters for automatic context
- Your data never trains AI models
Search like you think
Describe your legal question in plain English. Filter by jurisdiction, date, and court level. Read full opinions without leaving Ezel.
- All 50 states plus federal courts
- Natural language queries - no boolean syntax
- Citation analysis and network exploration
- Copy quotes with automatic citation generation
Ready to transform your legal workflow?
Join legal teams using Ezel to draft documents, research case law, and organize matters — all in one workspace.