VA P.D. 23-29 BPOL Tax 2023-03-16

If I report trucking income on a federal Schedule C, does that automatically mean I'm operating a business subject to local BPOL tax rather than working as an employee?

Short answer: Reporting trucking income on a federal Schedule C creates a REBUTTABLE presumption that you're operating a business subject to local BPOL tax, but it's not automatically conclusive -- in this case, the county's own "final determination" was itself invalid because it cited the wrong local tax appeals statute and omitted the appeal-rights language state regulations require, so the case was sent back to the county to issue a proper determination and give the truck driver a real chance to rebut the presumption with evidence.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2023. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Disclaimer: This is an official published Ruling of the Virginia Tax Commissioner (Virginia Department of Taxation), issued as a redacted public document. It is based on the specific facts the taxpayer presented and the law in effect when issued; different facts or later changes in the law can change the result, and another taxpayer should not assume it applies to their situation. Virginia's retail sales and use tax is administered by the Department, but many Virginia local taxes, including the business license (BPOL) tax, business tangible personal property tax, and machinery and tools tax, are administered by local commissioners of the revenue. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Virginia tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A truck driver filed a federal Schedule C using a county business code on his joint 2020 Virginia individual tax return. The county saw that filing and concluded he was operating a business within its borders, requiring a business license -- and since he hadn't obtained one or paid any BPOL (Business, Professional and Occupational License) tax, it assessed him. He appealed to the county, arguing he was actually an EMPLOYEE of a trucking company (not a business operator) and that the county hadn't told him about his appeal rights. The county's response upheld the assessment, saying he hadn't provided evidence he was an employee or that he'd filed income tax returns elsewhere that would let him deduct gross receipts attributable to out-of-state business. He then appealed to the Department, repeating both arguments.

Before reaching the classification question, the Department found the county's own process was flawed. Virginia's BPOL appeals statute (Va. Code § 58.1-3703.1, a DIFFERENT statute than the one governing most other local business taxes) requires a taxpayer to first file a local appeal, after which the locality must issue a final determination containing specific required language notifying the taxpayer of further appeal rights (per 23 VAC 10-500-710). The county's letter cited the WRONG statute entirely (the general local-business-tax appeals statute, not the BPOL-specific one) and omitted the required appeal-rights language -- so it wasn't actually a valid final determination.

On the substance the Department did address: reporting income on a Schedule C (rather than as W-2 wages) is normally indicative of operating a business, and actually creates a REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION under Virginia law that a business is being operated -- but the Department also noted the trucking industry raises its own recurring wrinkles in local taxation that it has addressed in a string of prior rulings. The Department didn't resolve who was right; instead, because the county's determination was invalid, it sent the whole case back for the county to issue a PROPER final determination, this time citing the correct statute and including the required notice language -- with the taxpayer given a fresh chance to submit evidence and rebut the Schedule C presumption, and normal appeal rights (90 days after a valid final determination, or after a year of pending with proper notice) preserved from there.

What this means for you

Truck drivers (or anyone) who file a federal Schedule C but consider themselves an employee

Filing a Schedule C creates a rebuttable presumption that you're operating a business subject to local BPOL tax -- it's not automatically conclusive, but you'll need to affirmatively provide evidence (e.g., proof of an employment relationship, other-state filings) to overcome it. Don't assume simply asserting "I'm an employee" is enough without documentation.

Anyone receiving a "final determination" letter from a locality on a BPOL dispute

Check that it actually cites the BPOL-specific appeals statute (Va. Code § 58.1-3703.1) and includes the notice-of-appeal-rights language required by 23 VAC 10-500-710. If it cites the wrong statute (e.g., the one governing other local business taxes) or omits that language, it may not be a valid final determination -- and the Department can send the case back on that basis alone, without even reaching the merits.

Localities administering BPOL tax appeals

Make sure final determination letters cite the correct governing statute (§ 58.1-3703.1, not § 58.1-3983.1, which covers other local business taxes) and include the specific appeal-rights notice language required by 23 VAC 10-500-710 -- a procedurally defective determination can get the whole case remanded regardless of the substantive merits.

Common questions

Q: Does filing a federal Schedule C automatically mean I'm subject to local BPOL tax as a business operator?
A: Not automatically, but it creates a rebuttable presumption that you're operating a business -- you can overcome it with evidence, such as proof you're actually an employee.

Q: What's required for a locality's "final determination" on a BPOL appeal to be valid?
A: It must cite the correct BPOL appeals statute (Va. Code § 58.1-3703.1) and include the specific notice language about appeal rights required by 23 VAC 10-500-710.

Q: What happens if a locality's final determination is procedurally defective?
A: The Department can remand the case for the locality to issue a valid final determination, without deciding the underlying dispute (like a worker-classification question) at that point.

Q: Does the trucking industry get any special treatment for BPOL purposes?
A: The Department has addressed a number of trucking-industry-specific local taxation issues in prior rulings, though this ruling doesn't resolve the specific classification question for this taxpayer -- that was left to the remanded local process.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code § 58.1-3703.1 A 5 (BPOL local appeal procedure and appealable events)
  • Va. Code § 58.1-3703.1 A 6 a (Department appeal only after final local determination)
  • Va. Code § 58.1-3703.1 A 5 e (direct Department appeal if local appeal pending over 1 year, with notice)
  • Va. Code § 58.1-3700.1 (Schedule C income creates rebuttable presumption of operating a business)
  • 23 VAC 10-500-710 (required content of a final BPOL local determination)
  • 23 VAC 10-500-640 (BPOL appeals review process)
  • Guidelines for Appealing Local Business Taxes, P.D. 04-28 (referenced framework for local business tax appeals)
  • P.D. 11-124 (7/1/2011) (Department appeal only after final local determination)
  • P.D. 15-16 (2/3/2015) and P.D. 18-204 (12/10/2018) (Schedule C reporting and rebuttable presumption of business operation)
  • P.D. 97-125 (3/11/1997), P.D. 99-84 (4/22/1999), P.D. 11-42 (3/16/2011), P.D. 12-172 (11/2/2012), P.D. 13-214 (11/22/2013), P.D. 14-94 (6/24/2014) (trucking-industry-specific BPOL issues)

Subject

Administration: Appeal - Jurisdiction Classification: Truck Drivers - Federal Schedule C

Source

Original ruling text

March 16, 2023

Re: Appeal of Final Local Determination

Taxpayer: *

Locality Assessing Tax: *

Business, Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) tax

Dear *:

This notice of jurisdiction is issued upon the application for correction filed by * (the “Taxpayer”) with the Department of Taxation. The Taxpayer appeals an assessment of BPOL tax issued by *** (the “County”) for the 2021 tax year.

The following determination is based on the facts presented to the Department summarized below. The Code of Virginia sections, regulations and public documents cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Laws, Rules and Decisions section of the Department’s web site.

FACTS

The Taxpayer filed a federal Form 1040 Schedule C using the County code on his joint Virginia individual tax return for the 2020 taxable year. As a result, the County determined that he was operating a business in the County and that a business license was required. Because the Taxpayer had not obtained a County business license or paid any BPOL tax, an assessment of BPOL tax was issued.

The Taxpayer appealed to the County, contending that he was an employee of a trucking company and therefore did not need to obtain a business license. He also argued that the County had not informed him of the appeals process. In its letter of February 9, 2022, the County upheld the assessment, stating that the Taxpayer had not provided any evidence showing that he was an employee rather than the operator of a business or that he had filed income tax returns in other states in order to allow him to deduct gross receipts attributable to business conducted out of state. The Taxpayer appealed to the Department, repeating his contentions that the County failed to inform him of his appeal rights and that he was an employee of a trucking company and, as such, was not required to obtain a business license or pay BPOL tax.

ANALYSIS

Jurisdiction

The Code of Virginia creates a review process designed to encourage resolution of local license tax issues through an appeals process that includes review by the local assessing officer and appeal to the Department. Through this process, a taxpayer who disagrees with an audit assessment may apply to the local assessing officer for review. If the taxpayer is dissatisfied with the results of the local review, the taxpayer may appeal the local decision to the Department, who will make a determination of the issues raised by the taxpayer. See Title 23 of the Virginia Administrative Code (VAC) 10-500-640.

Specifically, Virginia Code § 58.1-3703.1 A 5 provides that any person assessed with a local license tax as a result of an appealable event may file an administrative appeal of the assessment within one year from the last day of the tax year for which such assessment is made, or within one year from the date of the appealable event, whichever is later, with the commissioner of the revenue or other local assessing official. An appealable event is an increase in the assessment of a local license tax payable by the taxpayer, the denial of a refund, or the assessment of a local license tax where none previously was assessed. In addition, an appealable event includes a taxpayer’s appeal of a classification, regardless of whether it is in conjunction with an assessment, examination, audit, or any other action taken by the locality.

This statute also provides the procedure that a taxpayer must follow to appeal a final local license tax assessment. A taxpayer must file an appeal with the locality in which the appealable event occurred. Once an appeal is filed, the locality’s assessing officer will fully review the taxpayer’s claim and issue a final determination letter setting forth the facts and arguments in support of its decision. See Virginia Code § 58.1-3703.1 A 5 b.

Under Virginia Code § 58.1-3703.1 A 6 a, a taxpayer may file an appeal with the Department only after a final determination has been issued by a locality. See Public Document (P.D.) 11-124 (7/1/2011). Virginia Code § 58.1-3703.1 A 5 e, however, does allow a taxpayer to appeal directly to the Department if an appeal filed with a locality has been pending for more than one year. Under such circumstances, the taxpayer can elect to consider the local appeal to have been denied. The taxpayer is required to give a locality 30 days written notice of such an election.

The Taxpayer contends that the County did not provide the required notice of his appeal rights. The County’s purported final local determination cited Virginia Code § 58.1-3983.1, which addresses the procedure for appealing local business tax assessments other than the BPOL tax. Virginia Code § 58.1-3703.1, however, is the statute governing the BPOL tax appeals process. Further, Title 23 VAC 10-500-710 contains specific language that must be included in any final written determination for a BPOL tax appeal. This language was not included in the County’s final local determination.

Income Tax Statutes and Regulations

The Taxpayer cites certain income tax statutes and regulations in support of his contention that he was not subject to the BPOL tax. The BPOL tax, however, is a separate and distinct tax, and the income tax statutes and regulations cited do not apply to BPOL tax. The amount, if any, of a taxpayer’s gross receipts that are subject to the BPOL tax must be addressed with reference to the applicable BPOL statutes and regulations found in Chapter 37 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia ( Virginia Code § 58.1-3700 et seq.) and Title 23 VAC 10-500-10 et seq., respectively.

Truck Drivers

It appears that the Taxpayer reported income from trucking services on a Schedule C. Normally, reporting such income on a Schedule C, rather than as wages reportable on a Form W-2, would be indicative of operating a business. See P.D. 15-16 (2/3/2015). In fact, receiving income reportable on a Schedule C creates a rebuttable presumption that a business is being operated. See Virginia Code § 58.1-3700.1 and P.D. 18-204 (12/10/2018). The trucking industry, however, also presents some unique issues with respect to local taxation. The Department has previously addressed some of these issues. See, e.g., P.D. 97-125 (3/11/1997), P.D. 99-84 (4/22/1999), P.D. 11-42 (3/16/2011), P.D. 12-172 (11/2/2012), P.D. 13-214 (11/22/2013) and P.D. 14-94 (6/24/2014).

DETERMINATION

The County’s letter dated February 9, 2022, claimed to be a final determination, but that letter failed to cite the governing BPOL statute and did not include the required language to notify the Taxpayer of his appeal rights as prescribed under Title 23 VAC 10-500-710. The Taxpayer, however, has not provided the County with certain information that it requested. On appeal, a BPOL tax assessment is deemed prima facie correct, i.e., the local assessment will stand unless the taxpayer proves that it is incorrect.

In light of these circumstances, this case will be returned to the County so that the Commissioner of the Revenue can issue a valid final local determination. The Taxpayer must provide any information that the County may request as a part of its review. The Taxpayer should also review the analysis set forth above and submit any further information to the County he believes is relevant to its review. Once a new final local determination is issued, the Taxpayer will have 90 days to file an appeal with the Department if he disagrees with the outcome of that determination. If the case has been pending with the County for more than one year, the Taxpayer may also appeal to the Department after giving the County the requisite notice. I also recommend that the Taxpayer and County review the BPOL tax appeals procedures described in Title 23 VAC 10-500-640 et seq.

If you have any questions regarding this determination, you may contact * in the Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Craig M. Burns

Tax Commissioner

AR/4174.B

Related Documents

97-125

99-84

11-42

11-124

12-172

13-214

14-94

15-16

18-204

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2023 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.