Could owners claim Virginia fixed-date-conformity bonus-depreciation subtractions reported on their pass-through entity forms when Virginia had no record of an earlier addition?

Plain-English summary

A married couple claimed Virginia fixed-date-conformity (FDC) depreciation subtractions for 2015 and 2016 based on their ownership of a pass-through entity. Virginia initially denied the subtractions because it found no record that the couple or entity had reported the corresponding FDC addition in an earlier year.

The couple produced Virginia asset reports and VK-1 forms showing that the entity calculated federal bonus depreciation on assets placed in service earlier but did not use that bonus depreciation for Virginia. The forms reported the later Virginia subtractions passed through to the owners.

The Tax Commissioner allowed the subtractions. When owners accurately report tax information supplied by a pass-through entity, that information is presumed correct. An error by the entity should be corrected first at the entity level and then passed through to owners. Because the couple properly reported the amounts on the federal and Virginia entity forms, the 2015 and 2016 assessments were abated.

If an earlier owner-level FDC addition was required but omitted, Virginia could correct that earlier return only within the applicable limitation period. If the error came from the entity returns, Virginia had to audit and adjust the entity level.

What this means for you

Owners should preserve VK-1s, entity asset schedules, and the history linking a prior Virginia bonus-depreciation addition to later subtractions. The ruling protected accurate owner reporting while leaving Virginia authority to correct the actual reporting error at the proper level.

Common questions

Why did Virginia originally deny the subtractions? It found no record of a prior FDC addition by the couple or the entity.

What evidence changed the result? Virginia asset reports and VK-1 forms tracing the subtractions to entity assets with federal, but not Virginia, bonus depreciation.

What happened to the assessments? They were abated.

Citations and references

• Va. Code § 58.1-301; §§ 58.1-390.1, 58.1-390.2, 58.1-391, and 58.1-394.1.
• IRC § 168(k); Treas. Reg. § 301.6221-1(a).
• Virginia Tax Bulletins 16-1 and 17-1.
• P.D. 98-158 and 07-195 -- conformity guidance cited by the ruling.

Source

• Landing page: Virginia Laws, Rules & Decisions
• Ruling: P.D. 20-31

Original ruling text

March 4, 2020

Re: § 58.1-1821 Appeal: Individual Income Tax

Dear *:

This will respond to your letter in which you seek correction of the individual income tax assessments issued to * (the “Taxpayers”) for the taxable years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016. I apologize for the delay in responding to your appeal.

FACTS

The Taxpayers, a husband and wife, filed joint Virginia individual income tax returns for the 2015 and 2016 taxable years, claiming Fixed Date Conformity (FDC) subtractions on both returns. Under review, the Department requested additional information to determine if the Taxpayers qualified for the subtractions. Based on the information received, the Department disallowed the subtractions, and issued assessments. The Taxpayers appeal, contending the FDC subtractions on their returns are correct.

DETERMINATION

Virginia Code § 58.1-301 provides that terminology and references used in Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia will have the same meaning as provided in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) unless a different meaning is clearly required. For individual income tax purposes, Virginia conforms to federal law in that it starts the computation of Virginia taxable income with federal adjusted gross income (FAGI). Income included in the FAGI of a Virginia resident is subject to taxation by Virginia, unless it was specifically exempt as a Virginia modification pursuant to Virginia Code §§ 58.1-322.01 through 58.1-322.04.

In 2003, Virginia began conforming to the IRC as of a specific or fixed date. Since then, the General Assembly has enacted legislation to move the date of conformity forward each year. Effective for taxable years beginning on and after January 1, 2015, Virginia’s conformity date was advanced from December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015, with limited exceptions. See Virginia Tax Bulletin (VTB) 16-1 (2/5/2016). Effective for taxable years beginning on and after January 1, 2016 Virginia’s conformity date was advanced from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016 with limited exceptions. See VTB 17-1 (2/6/2017). For both taxable years, Virginia continued to prohibit bonus depreciation allowed for certain assets under IRC § 168(k).

Because Virginia does not fully conform to the IRC, any bonus depreciation must be adjusted to determine the depreciation amount for Virginia income tax purposes. FDC additions and subtractions, therefore, are not considered to be Virginia modifications. Rather, any exceptions identified in Virginia Code § 58.1-301 are added to or subtracted from FAGI as computed under the IRC in order to determine an individual taxpayer’s FAGI for Virginia income tax purposes.

For example, if a taxpayer computed their FAGI using bonus depreciation for one or more assets, then their FAGI for Virginia purposes must be recomputed as if those assets had not received bonus depreciation, resulting in a Virginia addition. In a later tax year, when the Virginia depreciation amounts are less than the federal depreciation amounts, the taxpayer would recognize the difference by taking a Virginia subtraction. In general, FDC subtractions can be taken in the immediate tax years following the tax year in which an FDC addition was reported. The FDC addition required in the prior year must be equal to or greater than the total of FDC subtractions claimed in subsequent years.

FDC additions and subtractions are often taken on an individual’s return pursuant to an ownership interest in a pass-through entity (PTE). A PTE is “any entity … that is recognized as a separate entity for federal income tax purposes, in which the partners, members, or shareholders report their share of the income, gains, losses, deductions and credits from the entity on their federal income tax returns.” See Virginia Code § 58.1-390.1. In determining Virginia taxable income of an owner of a PTE, each item of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit shall be in the same proportion as the owner’s distributive share, for federal income tax purposes, and have the same character and be incurred in the same manner for an owner as if realized directly from the source from which it was realized by the PTE. See Virginia Code § 58.1-391. Owners of a PTE usually are liable for tax in their individual capacities only on income that is passed through to them, while the PTE is liable for taxes imposed on PTE itself. See Virginia Code § 58.1-390.2.

This statutory regime implies that when a PTE provides tax information to an individual owner and they accurately report the amounts on their Virginia return, the information is presumed to be correct. If it is determined that an error was made by a PTE, a change or correction would happen first to the PTE, then the change or correction would pass through to the individual owners.

In this case, the Department denied the Taxpayers’ FDC subtractions because there is no record of the Taxpayers or the relevant PTE taking an FDC addition in a prior taxable year. The Taxpayers explain that they owned a PTE from which they reported their share of the income, gains, losses, deductions and credits on their individual returns. They provided Virginia asset reports and VK-1 forms, showing that the FDC subtractions were taken for depreciation of assets that were placed in service prior to the taxable years at issue for which bonus depreciation was calculated at the federal level but not for Virginia. They assert that, because bonus depreciation was claimed in prior taxable years on the federal level but not for Virginia, they are now entitled to recognize that difference by taking a Virginia subtraction.

Virginia’s conformity to federal law is limited. See Public Document (P.D.) 98-158 (10/20/1998) and P.D. 07-195 (11/27/2007). Further guidance can be instructive in determining how the Department could approach the administration of Virginia’s income tax structure. Under Treas. Reg. § 301.6221-1(a)(a), the tax treatment of income, loss, deductions, and credits are determined at the partnership level. This means that the IRS, in general, cannot change a partner’s treatment of partnership items on the partner’s return. While not required, the Department should defer to the IRS procedures when making adjustments to amounts reported on a federal return. Because FDC additions and subtractions are essentially a modification to federal income tax laws, the Department must, likewise, consider the implications of IRS procedures. Examining FDC additions and subtractions reported by a PTE on the PTE’s return provides a more complete audit trail and record keeping consistency.

Because the Taxpayers properly reported their FDC subtraction as indicated on their federal and Virginia PTE tax forms, they are entitled to claim the subtraction on their 2015 and 2016 Virginia joint individual income tax returns. Accordingly, the assessments at issue have been abated.

If the Department determines there has been an error in reporting an FDC addition in prior taxable years, then the Department must correct the Taxpayers’ return for the taxable year in which an addition was required but not taken. As such, correction must be made within the applicable statute of limitations. Further, if the Department ascertains there has been a reporting error on the returns provided by the Taxpayers’ PTE, then the Department must audit and make adjustments at the PTE level. Pursuant to Virginia Code § 58.1-394.1, the Department is authorized to impose a penalty equal 6% of the PTE’s Virginia taxable income when such PTE fails to file a required return with the time required.

The Code of Virginia sections, and public documents cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Laws, Rules & Decisions section of the Department’s web site. If you have any questions regarding this determination, you may contact * in the Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Craig M. Burns

Tax Commissioner

AR/2073C

Related Documents

98-158

07-195

16-1

17-1