VA P.D. 16-76 Retail Sales and Use Tax 2016-05-11

What happened when a medical-equipment seller supplied new documents after a Virginia sales-tax audit?

Short answer: Virginia did not decide the claimed exemptions outright. Because the seller supplied additional records after the audit, the Department returned the case to audit staff for review and directed that the assessments be revised only if the documents warranted changes.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2016. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2016
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official published Ruling of the Virginia Tax Commissioner (Virginia Department of Taxation), issued as a redacted public document. It is based on the specific facts the taxpayer presented and the law in effect when issued; different facts or later changes in the law can change the result, and another taxpayer should not assume it applies to their situation. Virginia's retail sales and use tax is administered by the Department, but many Virginia local taxes, including the business license (BPOL) tax, business tangible personal property tax, and machinery and tools tax, are administered by local commissioners of the revenue. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Virginia tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Taxpayer has provided additional documentation, the audit will be returned to the audit staff to review the additional documentation

Plain-English summary

A medical-equipment seller and lessor challenged use tax assessed on sales to the United States and sales tax assessed on durable medical equipment allegedly purchased by or for specific individuals. It lacked sufficient documentation when the audit ended but submitted additional records with its appeal.

Virginia emphasized that an assessment is presumed correct under Va. Code § 58.1-205 and that taxpayers must retain records supporting their returns under Va. Code § 58.1-102. Without documentation at audit, the taxpayer had not yet met its burden.

The Department nevertheless returned the audit to staff to review the new material. It did not rule that either category was exempt; it directed the auditor to revise the assessments if the document review warranted an adjustment and otherwise issue updated assessments.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code §§ 58.1-205 and 58.1-102.

Source

Original ruling text

May 11, 2016

Re: § 58.1-1821 Application: Retail Sales and Use Tax

Dear *:

This will reply to your letter in which seek correction of the retail sales and use tax audit assessments issued to * (the "Taxpayer") for the periods January 2011 through June 2013 and July 2013 through December 2013.

FACTS

The Taxpayer sells and leases medical equipment. The Taxpayer takes exception to two areas in the audit findings: (1) use tax assessed on sales made to the United States; and (2) sales tax assessed on durable medical equipment purchased by or on behalf of a specific individual. The Taxpayer provides additional documentation to substantiate the above exceptions and requests a review of this documentation and adjustments be made to the audit accordingly.

DETERMINATION

Pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-205, "Any assessment of tax by the Department shall be deemed prima facie correct." The burden of proving that an assessment issued by the Department is incorrect rests with the taxpayer.

Virginia Code § 58.1-102 states:

It shall be the duty of every taxpayer to retain suitable records and documents substantiating all information contained in any return required by this statute and any such other pertinent records or documents as the Tax Commissioner may require by regulation. The records and documents shall be preserved for a period of three years from the required date for filing a return to which such records or documents pertain.

At the completion of the audit, the Taxpayer did not have sufficient documentation to support the claims in this appeal. Because the Taxpayer was unable to provide documentation, it failed to meet its burden of proving that the tax assessed in the audit was incorrect.

In light of the fact that the Taxpayer has provided additional documentation, the audit will be returned to the audit staff to review the additional documentation. Following the completion of the document review, the audit assessments will be revised if warranted and updated assessments will be issued. If there is a balance remaining, please remit payment to: Virginia Department of Taxation, 600 E. Main Street, 15 th Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219, Attn: *.

The Code of Virginia sections cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Laws, Rules, and Decisions section of the Department's web site. If you have any questions concerning this determination, please contact * in the Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at . Questions concerning the documentation review should be directed to in the Office of Compliance, Field Audit, at ***.

Sincerely,

Craig M. Burns
Tax Commissioner

AR/1-6245896439.T

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2016 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.