What result is verifiable from the published order in Karl Edward Beisel v. Virginia Department of Taxation?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2015. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.
Subject
Court Case: Karl Edward Beisel v. Virginia Department of Taxation and Craig Burns
Plain-English summary
The published document is a short final order from the Circuit Court of the City of Chesapeake. Karl Edward Beisel sued the Virginia Department of Taxation and Tax Commissioner Craig Burns.
The court granted the defendants' demurrer and dismissed the case with prejudice, making the order final and appealable. The order states that the reasons appeared in a letter opinion dated April 10, 2015.
That letter opinion is not included in the Department's published source. The order itself does not identify the tax dispute, the claims, or the court's reasoning. Those details therefore remain unresolved on this page rather than being inferred.
Common questions
Who won? The Virginia Department of Taxation and Tax Commissioner; the case was dismissed with prejudice.
Why was it dismissed? The published order does not say. It refers to an omitted April 10, 2015 letter opinion.
Can this page describe the underlying tax rule? No. The available official source does not provide enough text to ground one.
Citations and references
- Karl Edward Beisel v. Virginia Department of Taxation and Craig Burns, Case No. CL15-2 (Chesapeake Circuit Court order entered May 6, 2015).
Source
- Landing page: Virginia Laws, Rules & Decisions
- Ruling: P.D. 16-7
Original ruling text
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE
KARL EDWARD BEISEL,
Plaintiff
v. Case No. CL15-2
THE VIRGINIA DEPARMENT OF TAXATION
and CRAIG BURNS.
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter having come before the Court on the Demurrer of the Defendants, the Plaintiff having responded thereto, the Court having received argument from the parties on March 4, 2015, and upon consideration of the same, issued a Letter Opinion dated April 10, 2015,
IT IS ORDERED:
For the reasons stated in the Letter Opinion, the Demurrer is granted and this matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
This is a final and appealable order. There is no just cause for delay.
The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this order to all parties.
Entered 6 th day of May 2015.
Hon. John W. Brown, Judge
Chesapeake Circuit Court
See Attached endorsement
CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE COPY
OF THE RECORD IN MY CUSTODY,
FAYE W. MITCHELL, CLERK
CIRCUIT COURT, CHESAPEAKE, VA
BY : ____
Deputy Clerk
Order tendered by:
Duncan Pitchford
Mark R. Herring
Attorney General
John W. Daniel, II
Deputy Attorney General
Heather Hays Lockerman
Senior Assistant Attorney General & Section Chief
J. Duncan Pitchford (VSB No. 87065)
Assistant Attorney General III
Counsel of Record
Office of the Attorney General
Commonwealth of Virginia
900 East Main Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
(804) 371-0977 — Office
(804) 786-2650 — Facsimile
[email protected]
Seen: and objected to for the reasons set forth in the pleadings and on the record at oral argument.
Michael L. Donner, Sr., Esq.
CARREL BLANTON FERRIS AND ASSOCIATES, PLC
7275 Glen Forest Drive, Suite 310
Richmond, Virginia 23226
Telephone: (804) 285-7900
Facsimile: (804) 767-8390
[email protected]
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 2015 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.