Was an LLC's sole officer personally liable for sales-and-use-tax and litter-tax liabilities discovered after the business closed?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2013. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Virginia abated the converted assessments because the owner did not meet every condition for personal responsible-officer liability. He was the LLC's sole officer and 100% owner, but said other people managed the business. The LLC ceased operations and sold its assets in April 2011; the Department did not issue the audit assessments until October 2012.
Va. Code § 58.1-1813 required more than an officer title. The person had to be under a duty to perform the relevant tax act, have knowledge of the failure, have authority to prevent it, and willfully fail to pay, collect, account for, or pay over the tax.
The record showed that the LLC had settled its debts with the funds available when the sale closed, including paying back taxes known to the settlement agent. Because the audit liabilities were not identified until 18 months after the business closed, the taxpayer lacked knowledge of them and had not preferred other creditors over those later assessments. The converted sales-and-use-tax and litter-tax assessments were therefore abated.
What this means for you
- An ownership interest or officer title alone did not establish liability under the standard applied here.
- Knowledge of the tax failure and authority to prevent it were express statutory conditions.
- Closure records, settlement statements, and payment history can be important evidence.
- The result was fact-specific; an officer who knew of unpaid tax while choosing other creditors could face a different outcome.
Common questions
Q: Did the LLC's underlying tax liabilities disappear?
A: The ruling addressed the assessments converted to this individual and ordered those converted assessments abated.
Q: Why did the timing of the audit matter?
A: The audit identified the liabilities 18 months after the LLC had closed and settled its debts, supporting the finding that the taxpayer lacked knowledge of them.
Q: Was being the sole owner enough for personal liability?
A: No. The ruling required all statutory responsible-officer conditions to be met.
Citations and references
- Va. Code § 58.1-1813 A-B.
- Angelson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 25 Va. Cir. 319 (City of Richmond, 1991), cited by the taxpayer.
Subject
Converted liabilities to the Taxpayer from LLC
Source
- Landing page: Virginia Laws, Rules & Decisions
- Ruling: P.D. 13-143
Original ruling text
July 22, 2013
Re: § 58.1-1821 Application: Retail Sales and Use Tax, Litter Tax
Dear *:
This is in response to your letter in which you request the correction of converted retail sales and use tax and litter tax assessments issued to * (the "Taxpayer") for the periods October 2009 through January 2011 and January 2006 through December 2010, respectively. I apologize for the delay in responding to your appeal.
FACTS
The Taxpayer was the sole officer of and held a 100% interest in * (the "LLC"). The Department audited the LLC and issued assessments for unreported sales and use taxes on October 18, 2012, and unreported litter taxes on October 17, 2012. Pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-1813, the Department converted the LLC's outstanding sales and use tax and litter tax liabilities to the Taxpayer on December 7, 2012.
The Taxpayer states that he was the CEO of a separate business in a different city and was not actively involved in the LLC's business. The Taxpayer's brother initially managed the LLC's business operations from 2004 until 2006. Subsequently, other persons managed the business. The LLC was not financially successful. The business ceased operations and the LLC's assets were sold in April 2011. The Taxpayer has provided documentation that includes a settlement statement that lists the LLC's final receipts, including the sale proceeds, and the final disbursements of the LLC. After payment of the LLC's debts, * remained after the sale was complete. The Taxpayer maintains that, pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-1813 and Angelson v. Commonwealth of Virginia , 25 Va. Cir. 319 (City of Richmond, 1991), he is not personally liable for the business assessments made against the LLC.
DETERMINATION
Virginia Code § 58.1-1813 A states that:
Any corporate, partnership or limited liability officer who willfully fails to pay, collect, or truthfully account for and pay over any tax administered by the Department of Taxation, or willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any such tax or the payment thereof, shall in addition to other penalties provided by law, be liable to a penalty of the amount of the tax evaded, or not paid, collected or accounted for and paid over, to be assessed and collected in the same manner as such taxes are assessed and collected.
Virginia Code § 58.1-1813 B defines the term "corporate, partnership or limited liability officer" as:
an officer or employee of a corporation, or a member, manager or employee of a partnership or limited liability company, who as such officer, employee, member or manager is under a duty to perform on behalf of the corporation, partnership or limited liability company the act in respect of which the violation occurs and who (1) had knowledge of the failure or attempt as set forth herein and 2) had the authority to prevent such failure or attempt.
The Taxpayer maintains that he should not be held personally liable for the unpaid assessments issued to the LLC for two reasons. First, the Taxpayer asserts that he did not willfully fail to pay the taxes due because the Department's audit was not completed until 18 months after the LLC had ceased doing business. Second, the Taxpayer asserts that he had no knowledge of the LLC's failure to report and pay the liabilities at issue until the Department's audit was performed. When the Department's assessments were made, the LLC had settled and paid all its debts with the funds that were available when the sale of the business was finalized. In fact, the settlement included payment to the Department for back taxes that the settlement agent was made aware of at that time. A review of the Virginia State Corporation Commission's database also confirms that the LLC is no longer active.
Based on the facts and documentation presented, the Taxpayer was not knowledgeable of the sales and use tax and litter tax liabilities assessed in the Department's audit because the LLC ceased doing business 18 months prior to the audit. In addition, there was never a time when the LLC's creditors were paid in preference to the audit assessments issued by the Department because the LLC was no longer in business. For these reasons, the Taxpayer does not satisfy all of the conditions required to be considered a corporate officer pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-1813. Accordingly, the converted assessments at issue will be abated.
The Code of Virginia section cited, along with other reference documents, are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Laws, Rules and Decisions section of the Department's web site. If you have any questions concerning this determination, please contact * in the Department's Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.
Sincerely,
Craig M. Burns
Tax Commissioner
AR/1-5301851899.S
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 2013 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.