Ezel / Tax Rulings / VA
VA P.D. 12-152 Individual Income Tax 2012-08-20

What did the Warren County Circuit Court order in Early A. Caudle's case against the Virginia Department of Taxation?

Short answer: The court sustained the Department's demurrer because the plaintiff did not object and dismissed the case with prejudice. The short published order does not describe the underlying tax dispute or state a substantive tax-law holding, so no broader merits conclusion can be drawn from this document.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2012. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2012
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a Warren County Circuit Court dismissal order published by the Virginia Department of Taxation, not a Tax Commissioner ruling. It binds the parties and dismissed this case with prejudice, but the order does not identify the underlying tax issue or articulate a substantive tax-law holding. Trial-court orders may be appealed and are not statewide precedent like Supreme Court of Virginia decisions. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The court dismissed Early A. Caudle's case against the Virginia Department of Taxation with prejudice. The Department filed a demurrer, and the plaintiff did not object to it.

The Warren County Circuit Court sustained the demurrer and ordered the case dismissed with prejudice. The plaintiff signed the proposed order as seen and agreed.

The published order does not explain the underlying tax dispute, the Department's legal argument, or any substantive tax-law rule. It supports only the procedural outcome stated above.

Common questions

Q: Did the court rule on a specific tax doctrine in this order?
A: The order does not identify one.

Q: What does “with prejudice” mean here?
A: The order states that this case was dismissed with prejudice; it does not provide further analysis.

Q: Is this a Tax Commissioner ruling?
A: No. It is a Warren County Circuit Court order republished in the Department's P.D. library.

Subject

Court Case

Source

Original ruling text

VIRGINIA:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY

EARLY A. CAUDLE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 187CL12000423-00

)

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, )

DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on August 20, 2012, on the Defendant's

Demurrer.

IT APPEARING that this Demurrer is not objected to by the Plaintiff, the Court

finds that this Demurrer should be SUSTAINED.

ADJUDGED, ORDERED, AND DECREED that the Defendant's Demurrer is

SUSTAINED. It is further ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that this case be

DISMISSED with prejudice.

ENTERED this 20 th day of August, 2012

Circuit Court Judge

I ask for this:

COMMONWEAL OF VIRGINIA

Elizabeth Bushnell Myers (VSB #80739)

Assistant Attorney General

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA

900 East Main Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

(804) 786-9516 (telephone)

(804) 692-1647 (facsimile)

[email protected]

Counsel for the Defendant, Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Taxation

Seen and Agreed to:

Early A. Caudle August 16, 2012

283 Grove Farm Road

Front Royal, VA 22630

Plaintiff Pro Se

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2012 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.