What did the Chesterfield County Circuit Court decide in Ross L. McDonald's case against the Virginia Department of Taxation?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2008. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.
Subject
Court Case: Ross L. McDonald v. Virginia Department of Taxation
Plain-English summary
The Chesterfield County Circuit Court entered judgment for the Virginia Department of Taxation because Ross L. McDonald did not prove that the challenged assessments and collections were erroneous or improper.
After McDonald presented part of his case, the court granted the Department's motion to strike the allegations identified by page and line in the complaint. After all remaining evidence and closing arguments, the court found he had not met his burden on any allegation.
The case was removed from the active docket as an ended action. The final order says the court's reasons were stated orally at the June 2008 trial, but the published document does not reproduce those reasons or describe the tax type, disputed periods, amounts, or substantive claims.
What this means for you
- The taxpayer bore the burden of proving the assessments or collections wrong.
- McDonald failed to carry that burden on the record presented.
- Part of the complaint was struck before the end of trial.
- The short order does not support a broader tax-law conclusion beyond the procedural result.
Common questions
Who won?
The Virginia Department of Taxation.
Why did McDonald lose?
The court found he failed to prove the assessments and collections were erroneous or improper.
Does the order explain the underlying tax dispute?
No. Those details and the bench reasoning are absent from the published text.
Citations and references
- Ross L. McDonald v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Taxation, Chesterfield County Circuit Court Case No. CL07-2432.
Source
- Landing page: Virginia Laws, Rules & Decisions
- Ruling: P.D. 10-14
Original ruling text
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY
ROSS L. McDONALD, )
)
Plaintiff, )
v. ) Case No. CL07-2432
)
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, )
DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, )
)
Defendant, )
FINAL ORDER
On June 17 and 18, 2008, the parties to this action, Ross L. McDonald ("McDonald"), in proper person, and the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Taxation ("Department of Taxation"), by counsel, appeared for trial upon the pleadings filed herein. The parties presented evidence to the Honorable Michael C. Allen for decision. After the completion of McDonald's proof and argument by counsel for the Department of Taxation, the Court, for the reasons stated from the bench on June 17, 2008, granted the Department of Taxation's motion to strike with respect to the allegations appearing between page 1, line 29 and page 4, line 4 of McDonald's complaint. Upon the conclusion of all the evidence and the parties' closing arguments, the Court found McDonald failed to carry his burden of showing that the assessments and collections of taxes from which he applied to this Court for correction were erroneous or otherwise improper. Therefore, for the foregoing reasons and those stated from the bench at trial, the Court hereby enters judgment in favor of the Department of Taxation with respect to all allegations in McDonald's complaint. Nothing further remaining to be done herein, this case is stricken from the docket, to be indexed among the ended actions at law. Pursuant to Rule 1:13, the Court dispenses with the requirement of endorsement of this order by all counsel of record. The Court orders the Clerk to certify a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.
ENTERED THIS 30 th DAY of June, 2008.
JUDGE - Michael C. Allen
WE ASK FOR THIS:
Thomas W. Nesbitt (VSB No. 73262)
Flora T. Hezel (VSB No. 47482)
Assistant Attorneys General
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
900 East Main Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
(804) 786-7750 (telephone)
(804) 786-1904 (facsimile)
Counsel for the Commonwealth of Virginia,
Department of Taxation
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 2008 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.