VA P.D. 10-120 Retail Sales and Use Tax 2010-07-01

Did Virginia's occasional-sale exemption cover equipment transferred to a subsidiary in a corporate spinoff?

Short answer: Yes. The transfer of all electronic-medical-records assets and equipment to a subsidiary for stock was a reorganization of the business and qualified for Virginia's occasional-sale exemption. The transaction's federal treatment under IRC § 368 did not control the Virginia sales-tax result. The equipment was removed from the audit, and the company received a refund with interest.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2010
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official published Ruling of the Virginia Tax Commissioner (Virginia Department of Taxation), issued as a redacted public document. It is based on the specific facts the taxpayer presented and the law in effect when issued; different facts or later changes in the law can change the result, and another taxpayer should not assume it applies to their situation. Virginia's retail sales and use tax is administered by the Department, but many Virginia local taxes, including the business license (BPOL) tax, business tangible personal property tax, and machinery and tools tax, are administered by local commissioners of the revenue. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Virginia tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Spinoff equipment qualified for the occasional-sale exemption

Plain-English summary

Virginia held that equipment transferred during the spinoff of an electronic medical records business qualified for the occasional-sale exemption. The taxpayer moved all assets and equipment related to the EMR system to a subsidiary in exchange for stock and then distributed the subsidiary's stock to its shareholders.

Virginia's occasional-sale definition expressly includes the reorganization or liquidation of a business. The Commissioner therefore treated the asset transfer as an exempt reorganization and removed the items labeled “Spinoff Equipment” from the audit.

The taxpayer had structured the transaction as a federal tax-free reorganization under IRC § 368(a)(1)(C), but the ruling emphasized that federal income-tax treatment did not control the Virginia retail sales and use tax analysis. Because the assessment had been paid, Virginia ordered a refund of the affected tax and interest, with refund interest.

What this means for you

  • Virginia's occasional-sale exemption can apply to tangible personal property transferred as part of a business reorganization.
  • The actual structure and scope of the asset transfer matter; a federal tax label alone does not decide the Virginia sales-tax result.
  • The statutory definition also covers the sale or exchange of all or substantially all business assets and business liquidations.
  • A registered dealer does not obtain the exemption merely because an asset differs from its usual merchandise.
  • Transaction agreements and asset schedules are important evidence when seeking removal of reorganization assets from an audit.

Common questions

Did the federal IRC § 368 reorganization status create the Virginia exemption?

No. The Commissioner said federal treatment had no bearing on the Virginia retail sales and use tax status.

Why did the equipment qualify?

The transfer of all EMR assets and equipment for subsidiary stock represented a reorganization of the taxpayer's business, a category covered by the occasional-sale rules.

What property was removed from the audit?

The items identified as “Spinoff Equipment” on the taxpayer's exceptions list.

What was the financial result?

The tax on those items was abated, and the paid tax and interest were refunded with refund interest.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code §§ 58.1-609.10 and 58.1-602.
  • 23 VAC 10-210-1080(B).
  • IRC § 368(a)(1)(C).
  • Virginia Public Documents 97-453 and 04-214.

Source

Original ruling text

July 1, 2010

Re: § 58.1-1821 Application: Retail Sales and Use Tax

Dear *:

This is in response to your letter and additional supporting documentation submitted on behalf of * (the "Taxpayer"), in which you seek correction of the retail sales and use tax assessment issued for the period October 2005 through August 2008. It is noted that the assessment has been paid in full. I apologize for the delay in responding to your appeal.

FACTS

The Taxpayer states that prior to 2007, it operated two different businesses. One portion of its business operated as an Internet/computer application provider and a telephone/cabling installation contractor. The other portion of its business was an Internet based electronic medical records (EMR) system. On January 1, 2007, the Taxpayer completed a tax-free reorganization pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 368(a)(1)(C). Under the reorganization all of the assets, including all of the equipment, related to the EMR system were distributed to a subsidiary corporation. After the distribution to the subsidiary, the stock in the subsidiary was distributed to the Taxpayer's shareholders. The basis of the assets distributed to the subsidiary was the same as the basis of the assets in the Taxpayer. Relying on Public Document (P.D.) 97-453 (11/14/97), the Taxpayer contends that the transfer of the EMR assets and equipment represents an occasional sale that is not subject to the retail sales and use tax.

DETERMINATION

Virginia Code § 58.1-609.10 states, the retail sales and use tax does not apply to "[a]n occasional sale as defined in § 58.1-602." Pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-602, an occasional sale is defined as:

A sale of tangible personal property not held or used by a seller in the course of an activity for which he is required to hold a certificate of registration, including the sale or exchange of all or substantially all the assets of any business and the reorganization or liquidation of any business, provided such sale or exchange is not one of a series of sales and exchanges sufficient in number, scope and character to constitute an activity requiring the holding of a certificate of registration.

Title 23 of the Virginia Administrative Code 10-210-1080 B further defines the term "occasional sale" as:

  1. A sale by a person who is engaged in sales on three or fewer separate occasions within one calendar year, except that sales at fairs, flea markets, circuses and carnivals and sales made by peddlers and street vendors are not occasional sales; or

  2. A sale of tangible personal property not held or used by a seller in the course of an activity for which he is required to hold a certificate of registration. The words "not held or used by a seller in the course of an activity for which he is required to hold a certificate of registration" mean that a registered dealer is not entitled to an occasional sale exemption solely by virtue of the fact that the article sold may be of a different class from the merchandise he/she regularly sells; or

  3. The sale or exchange of all or substantially all the assets of any business; or

  4. The reorganization or liquidation of any business.

In P.D. 97-453 (11/14/97), the taxpayer and the subsidiary together operated a chain of retail stores in Virginia. The subsidiary owned the tangible personal property used in the stores' business and the taxpayer's employees operated the stores. The taxpayer proposed a corporate reorganization to locate all aspects of operating the stores to the taxpayer. To this end, the two parties would conduct a series of transactions. First, the subsidiary would form a new corporate subsidiary ("new company") and contribute to the new company all of the assets used by the subsidiary in the stores in exchange for all of the stock of new company. The taxpayer believed that this transaction would qualify as a tax-free reorganization under I.R.C. § 351. The subsidiary would then distribute all of the stock of the new company to the taxpayer as a dividend. Finally the taxpayer would liquidate the new company and receive all of the assets in the new company. The first transaction between the subsidiary and new company was ruled a tax-exempt reorganization of assets for stock in the commencing organization. The Department had previously determined that such a transaction is a qualifying reorganization for purposes of the occasional sale. The second transaction, a stock dividend, was ruled not taxable because it did not involve the transfer of tangible personal property. Finally, the liquidation of the new company was ruled a qualifying liquidation under the occasional sale exemption as it represented the "sale or exchange or all or substantially all the assets" of the new company.

In addition, in P.D. 04-214 (12/8/04), the taxpayer purchased stock from its Parent company as part of a recapitalization agreement. The agreement transferred a portion of the Parent's consulting services to the taxpayer. The taxpayer treated the transaction as an asset sale for federal tax purposes under I.R.C. § 338(h)(10). The taxpayer also purchased items of tangible personal property from the Parent as part of the transition services agreement. The transition services agreement was entered into within a month of when the recapitalization agreement was executed. The taxpayer was assessed tax on these purchase transactions. The taxpayer maintained that the purchases were properly made exempt of the tax because the stock transaction qualified as an occasional sale. It was determined that the fact that the taxpayer treated the transaction, for federal tax purposes, as an asset sale under I.R.C. § 338(h)(10) had no bearing on the status of the transaction for Virginia retail sales and use tax purposes. The documentation provided with the taxpayer's letter indicated that the tangible personal property purchased from the Parent as part of the transition services agreement qualified as an exempt occasional sale because it represented the reorganization of a business. Accordingly, the transactions at issue were deemed exempt from the retail sales and use tax.

In this instance, the Taxpayer treated the transactions at issue as a reorganization pursuant to I.R.C. § 368(a)(1)(C). However, the treatment of these transactions under the Internal Revenue Code has no bearing on the status of these transactions for Virginia retail sales and use tax purposes. The transfer of all of the assets and equipment, related to the EMR system, for stock in the subsidiary company represents a reorganization of the Taxpayer's business. The occasional sales exemption applies to the tangible personal property at issue as a result of the reorganization.

Accordingly, the tangible personal property at issue (labeled Spinoff Equipment on the Non-Contested Sales of Assets exceptions list) will be removed from the audit and the tax assessed with respect to these items will be abated. The audit will be returned to the audit staff for revision based on this determination. Upon completion of the revision, the Taxpayer will receive a refund of the tax and interest paid with refund interest accrued to date.

The Code of Virginia sections, regulation and public documents cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Tax Policy Library section of the Department's web site. If you have any questions about this determination, you may contact * in the Department's Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Linda Foster

Deputy Tax Commissioner

AR/1-3551112461.P

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2010 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.