VA P.D. 09-7 Retail Sales and Use Tax 2009-02-04

What does Virginia Ruling of the Tax Commissioner P.D. 09-7 conclude about A registered dealer that failed to collect the sales tax on taxable transactions?

Short answer: No. The supplier had an independent duty to collect, report, and remit sales tax on taxable sales to the consuming contractor. The contractor's separate use-tax obligation did not erase the dealer's liability. Virginia could seek payment from either party and upheld the dealer's assessment for failing to collect the tax.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2009. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2009
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Virginia Tax Commissioner final determination on one registered dealer's 2004-2006 audit. Collection liability depends on dealer status, purchaser status, exemptions, certificates, transaction facts, payment history, and current law; another taxpayer should not assume the same result. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Dealer remained liable even though the contractor also owed use tax

Plain-English summary

Virginia held the registered dealer liable for sales tax it failed to collect from a consuming real-property contractor. The dealer argued that the contractor regulation placed use-tax liability on the purchaser when a supplier did not collect tax.

That purchaser obligation did not replace the dealer's separate duties. Virginia law required the dealer to collect tax, report taxable transactions, and remit the amount due. Failure to collect made the dealer liable for the tax itself.

The ruling explained that seller and purchaser can both have legal obligations and that the Department may seek payment from either. Because this audit concerned the registered dealer's collection compliance, the assessment remained in place.

What this means for you

  • A customer's use-tax duty does not excuse a registered seller's collection failure.
  • Treat real-property contractors as consumers unless a valid rule or certificate supports different treatment.
  • Maintain customer classification, exemption certificates, invoices, returns, and collected-tax records.
  • Payment by one party should be tracked to prevent duplicate collection, but both obligations may exist.

Common questions

Was the contractor also liable?

Yes, it could owe use tax if the supplier failed to collect sales tax.

Why could Virginia assess the dealer?

The dealer had its own statutory collection and remittance duties.

Was the audit revised again?

No. The Commissioner issued a final determination upholding the revised assessment.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code §§ 58.1-612, 58.1-615, 58.1-616, and 58.1-625.
  • 23 VAC 10-210-410(A).
  • United States v. Forst, 442 F. Supp. 920 (W.D. Va. 1977), aff'd, 569 F.2d 811 (4th Cir. 1978).

Source

Original ruling text

February 4, 2009

Re: § 58.1-1821 Reconsideration: Retail Sales and Use Tax

Dear *:

This is in response to your letter requesting reconsideration of the determination of June 18, 2008 made to * (the "Taxpayer") with respect to the retail sales and use tax assessment issued for the period January 2004 through December 2006. The Taxpayer's check of *** has been applied as partial payment of the contested assessment.

FACTS

In the prior determination, the sales tax assessed on sales made to a real property construction contractor was upheld because the sales were made to a consuming contractor and thus taxable. You take exception to this treatment based on Title 23 of the Virginia Administrative Code (VAC) 10-210-410 A, which specifically states, "If a supplier of a contractor doing work in Virginia does not collect the Virginia tax from the contractor, the contractor will be liable for the use tax on his purchases from the supplier." You contend that the Taxpayer has no sales tax liability because the contractor is liable for payment of the use tax on its untaxed purchases.

DETERMINATION

Pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-612, the Taxpayer is a dealer required to collect the sales tax. Pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-615, the Taxpayer is required to file a sales and use tax return showing all taxable transactions made within the period covered by the return. Pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-616, the Taxpayer is required to remit the amount of tax due to the Department. Also, the contractor regulation set out in Title 23 VAC 10-210-410 A states, "The dealer (supplier) making the sale, distribution, or lease to or storage for such a contractor must collect the tax from him." [Emphasis added.] Based on these authorities, the Taxpayer is clearly obligated under the law and regulation to properly collect, report, and remit the tax on all taxable sales to consumers. Otherwise, Va. Code § 58.1-625 provides that the Taxpayer becomes liable for the tax when it has neglected, failed, or refused to collect the sales tax on a taxable sale.

Under long settled principles of sales and use tax law, the Department may seek payment of the tax from either the seller or the purchaser of tangible personal property. The case of United States v. Forst , 442 F. Supp. 920 (W.D. Va. 1977) aff'd, 569 F.2d 811 (4th Cir. 1978) held that while "the seller is legally obligated to collect the tax from the purchaser, the statute makes the tax the legal debt of the purchaser." Thus, the courts fully recognize that legal obligations apply to both the seller and the purchaser. As such, the Department is well within its rights to audit the Taxpayer for compliance with its sales tax collection responsibilities and to assess a sales tax when full sales tax collection compliance is not achieved.

In this case, the Taxpayer is a registered dealer that failed to collect the sales tax on taxable transactions. Under the laws and court case cited above, the Taxpayer is required to collect the tax and failure to collect the tax makes the Taxpayer liable for the tax. I recognize that contractors have responsibilities also, such as to pay the use tax if the supplier does not collect it. However, the Department audited the Taxpayer and determined that as a registered dealer, it was required to collect the tax from the contractor at issue. Accordingly, I find no basis to further revise the audit assessment. This is my final determination.

CONCLUSION

Based on the above determination, the revised assessment is correct. An updated bill, with interest accrued to date, will be sent to the Taxpayer. The outstanding balance should be paid within 30 days of the bill date to avoid additional interest charges. The Taxpayer should remit its payment to: Virginia Department of Taxation, 3600 West Broad Street, Suite 160, Richmond, Virginia 23230, Attn: *. If you have any questions concerning payment of the assessment, you may contact at **.

The Code of Virginia section and regulation cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Tax Policy Library section of the Department's web site. If you have any questions about this final determination, you may contact * in the Department's Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Janie E. Bowen

Tax Commissioner

AR/1-2649613602.R

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2009 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.