VA P.D. 08-177 Retail Sales and Use Tax 2008-09-18

Were carrier maintenance fees and separately stated on-site modular-home trim-out labor exempt from Virginia sales tax?

Short answer: Virginia split the result. Carrier maintenance fees were taxable because they were only indirectly related to delivery. Separately stated factory trim-out labor performed on-site after contractors joined the modular sections to a permanent foundation was exempt installation labor and was removed from the audit.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2008. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2008
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Virginia Tax Commissioner determination on one modular-home manufacturer's March 2004-February 2007 audit. The result depended on separately stated charges, direct delivery, and on-site trim work after foundation installation. Other fees or bundled labor may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Modular-home trim-out labor was exempt; carrier maintenance was taxable

Plain-English summary

Virginia taxed carrier maintenance fees but exempted on-site factory trim-out charges. Carrier maintenance was not the direct act of delivery, so it did not qualify as transportation.

Trim-out work performed after contractors affixed the modular sections to a permanent foundation qualified as separately stated installation labor.

What this means for you

  • Delivery exemption does not cover indirect carrier upkeep.
  • Separately state and document qualifying installation labor.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code § 58.1-609.5(2), (3).
  • 23 VAC 10-210-6000(B).

Source

Original ruling text

September 18, 2008

Re: § 58.1-1821 Application: Retail Sales and Use Tax

Dear *:

This is in response to your letter requesting correction of the retail sales and use tax assessment issued to * (the "Taxpayer") as a result of an audit for the period March 2004 through February 2007.

FACTS

The Taxpayer is a modular building manufacturer selling modular homes at retail. The Taxpayer does not affix any homes to a permanent foundation. The contractors that purchase such homes perform the installations.

The Taxpayer contests the assessment of sales tax on carrier maintenance fees and contends that such fees should be considered part of the exempt delivery charges. The Taxpayer also contests the tax assessed on factory trim out (FTO) fees and contends that such fees are exempt installation labor charges. The FTO fees involve on-site labor to complete the trim work after the modular sections have been affixed to a permanent foundation by the purchaser of the modular building sections. Trim work involves the installation of baseboard, crown molding, stairs and fascia after the individual units are joined together by the contractor.

DETERMINATION

Carrier Maintenance Fees

Virginia Code § 58.1-609.5 3 provides an exemption for separately stated transportation charges. Title 23 of the Virginia Administrative Code 10-210-6000 B defines "transportation charges" as charges for delivery from the seller to the purchaser. This definition is consistent with the common meaning of the term "transportation," which is "[t]he act of transporting or the state of being transported." Webster's II New College Dictionary (p. 1172,1995). Because there is no statutory definition of transportation, the common meaning of the term applies. As such, the exemption is applicable only to the act of delivery and does not include maintenance charges that are indirectly related to the act of delivery. Accordingly, the tax on carrier maintenance fees is upheld.

FTO Fees

Virginia Code § 58.1-609.5 2 provides an exemption from the retail sales and use tax for "[a]n amount separately charged for labor or services rendered in installing . . . property sold." As the FTO charges are in connection with the installation of products regarding real property contracts, the charge constitutes a nontaxable installation charge. Accordingly, such charges will be removed from the audit.

CONCLUSION

The assessment will be revised in accordance with this determination. A revised bill, with interest accrued to date, will be sent to the Taxpayer. The outstanding balance should be paid within 30 days of the bill date to avoid additional interest charges.

The Code of Virginia sections and regulation cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Tax Policy Library section of the Department's web site. If you have any questions about this determination, you may, contact * in the Department's Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Janie E. Bowen

Tax Commissioner

AR/1-1919660201.R

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2008 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.