VA P.D. 08-176 Corporation Income Tax 2008-09-18

Did one officer working from a Virginia home create Virginia-source income for an out-of-state corporation?

Short answer: Yes. The officer lived and worked from a Virginia residence, performed duties other than sales solicitation, and had Virginia income tax withheld. That single employee created a positive Virginia payroll factor and Virginia-source income for 2005 and 2006 even though the company had no Virginia sales or property. The refund claim was denied.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2008. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2008
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Virginia Tax Commissioner determination on one company's 2005-2006 refund claim. The result depended on an officer residing and working in Virginia, nonsolicitation duties, Virginia withholding, payroll-factor rules and law then in effect. Remote-work nexus rules may have changed. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

One Virginia employee created a positive payroll factor

Plain-English summary

Virginia denied the company's refunds because one officer worked from a Virginia residence. The company had no Virginia sales or property, but the employee's presence created a positive payroll factor.

Under the rule applied, that positive factor established Virginia-source income and corporate-income-tax liability for 2005 and 2006.

What this means for you

  • A single home-based Virginia employee can affect nexus and apportionment.
  • Duties beyond protected sales solicitation are important.
  • Review employee location and payroll before filing refund claims.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code §§ 58.1-400, 58.1-1821, and 58.1-1824.
  • 23 VAC 10-120-20; P.D. 96-123.

Source

Original ruling text

September 18, 2008

Re: § 58.1-1824 Application: Corporate Income Tax

Dear *:

This will reply to your letter in which you seek a refund of corporate income tax paid by * (the "Taxpayer") for the taxable years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006.

FACTS

The Taxpayer is a limited liability company (LLC) that files as a C corporation for income tax purposes. The Taxpayer's corporate headquarters are located in * (State A). It has no sales or property in Virginia. One of its officers, however, resides in Virginia and works out of his residence. His job responsibilities do not include the solicitation of sales. The Taxpayer withholds Virginia income tax from this employee.

The Taxpayer filed Virginia corporate income tax returns for the 2005 and 2006 taxable year and paid Virginia income tax. The Taxpayer now contends it does not have Virginia source income and requests a refund of Virginia income tax paid for the 2005 and 2006 taxable years.

DETERMINATION

Pursuant to the authority granted the Tax Commissioner under Va. Code § 58.1-1824, a protective claim for refund can be held pending the outcome of another case before the courts or the claim may be decided based upon its merits pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-1821. As permitted by statute, the Taxpayer's request has been treated as an appeal under Va. Code § 58.1-1821.

Virginia Code § 58.1-400 imposes the income tax "on the Virginia taxable income for each taxable year of every corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth and every foreign corporation having income from Virginia sources." Generally, a corporation will have income from Virginia sources if there is sufficient business activity within Virginia to make any one or more of the applicable apportionment factors positive. The existence of positive Virginia apportionment factors clearly establishes income from Virginia sources. See the definition of "income and deductions from Virginia sources" under Title 23 of the Virginia Administrative Code (VAC) 10-120-20.

In the instant case, the Taxpayer has one employee working and residing in Virginia from whom it withholds Virginia income tax. The existence of one employee residing and working in Virginia creates a positive payroll factor. See Public Document (P.D.) 96-123 (6/7/1996). As such, the Taxpayer had Virginia source income for the taxable years at issue and is subject to Virginia's corporate income tax. Accordingly, the Taxpayer's request for refund of corporate income taxes paid for the 2005 and 2006 taxable year is denied.

The Code of Virginia section and public document cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact * in the Department's Office of Tax Policy, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Janie E. Bowen

Tax Commissioner

AR/1-2342935785.B

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2008 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.