VA P.D. 07-85 Retail Sales and Use Tax 2007-05-25

Could a technology consultant remove a three-month software license fee from Virginia's sales-tax audit sample as an unusual purchase?

Short answer: No. Virginia found that the software license purchase was not isolated: it covered up to 3,000 workspaces for three months and was reasonably part of a technology consultant's normal operations. The purchase remained in the sample, and the assessment stood.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2007. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2007
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official published Virginia Tax Commissioner determination concerning one taxpayer's audit sample for August 2000 through July 2003. Sampling conclusions depend on the taxpayer's operations and whether a transaction is genuinely isolated. Different facts, records, audit methods, or later law can change the result. Virginia retail sales and use tax is Department-administered. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Charge for license fee included in sample used in the audit for calculating liability

Plain-English summary

A technology consultant asked Virginia to remove a software license fee from the sample used to project its sales-and-use-tax audit liability. It argued that license fees were not regularly incurred and that this purchase inflated the assessment.

Virginia kept the purchase in the sample. Under the Department's sampling policy, a transaction is not removed merely because it is large or represents a large share of the sample; it must be isolated and outside the taxpayer's normal operations. This license covered up to 3,000 workspaces for three months, and Virginia considered that kind of purchase normal for a technology consultant. The taxpayer therefore did not overcome the presumption that the assessment was correct.

What this means for you

  • A high-dollar or infrequent purchase is not automatically excluded from a Virginia audit sample.
  • The key question is whether the transaction is isolated and outside the normal course of the taxpayer's operations.
  • To challenge extrapolation, document why the sampled item is not representative of transactions across the audit period.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code § 58.1-205, presumption that an assessment is correct and taxpayer's burden of proof.
  • P.D. 99-66 and P.D. 04-204, Department sampling policy.

Source

Original ruling text

May 25, 2007

Re: § 58.1-1821 Application: Retail Sales and Use Tax

Dear *:

This is in response to your letter in which you seek correction of the retail sales and use tax assessment issued to * (the "Taxpayer") for the period August 2000 through July 2003. I apologize for the delay in responding to your appeal.

FACTS

The Taxpayer contends that the charge for a license fee should not be included in the sample used in the audit for purposes of calculating the Taxpayer's tax liability. The Taxpayer maintains that it does not regularly incur charges for license fees and that the inclusion of this charge results in a higher assessment of tax than required.

DETERMINATION

Sampling

Sampling is an audit technique of significant value that is widely used in both the public and private sectors for all types of audits where a detailed audit would not prove beneficial either to the auditor or the client. When sampling techniques are applied, the final result should be within a narrow percentage range of the actual amount that would be determined by a detailed audit. The purpose of the audit sample is to determine a factor for errors within a representative select period. Once the error factor is determined, the factor is extrapolated over the entire audit period. The purpose of the projection is to account for likely similar transactions on which Virginia tax has not been paid.

Public Documents 99-66 (4/15/99) and 04-204 (11/23/04) set forth the Department's policy with respect to samples and explain that an item cannot be removed from the audit sample unless the transaction is isolated in nature and not a normal part of the taxpayer's operations, regardless of whether the item is a large dollar transaction or that it may constitute a large percentage of the taxable measure in the audit sample.

The Taxpayer's basis for removal of the license fee does not meet the criteria set out in the prior rulings cited above. The purchase of the license fee is not isolated in nature. The license fee is a software license fee that applies to up to 3,000 workspaces and covers a three-month period. As a technology consultant, it is reasonable that the Taxpayer would make such a purchase, and thus, the purchase is deemed a normal part of the Taxpayer's operations.

Virginia Code § 58.1-205 provides that any assessment of tax by the Department is deemed prima facie correct. The burden is on the taxpayer to prove the assessment is erroneous. The Taxpayer has not met that burden in this case.

Based on the foregoing, the contested purchase was properly included in the sample and the assessment is correct as issued. A revised bill, with interest accrued to date, will be mailed shortly to the Taxpayer. No additional interest will accrue provided the outstanding assessment is paid within 30 days from the date of the bill.

The Code of Virginia section and public documents cited are available on-line at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Tax Policy Library section of the Department's web site. If you have any questions about this determination, you may contact * in the Department's Office of Policy and Administration, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Janie E. Bowen

Tax Commissioner

AR/57150P

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2007 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.