VA P.D. 07-207 Individual Income Tax 2007-12-05

Could a Virginia partner claim resident credits for Arizona and California tax paid through unified nonresident partnership returns?

Short answer: Yes. Arizona and California generally offered reciprocal individual credits, but their unified nonresident returns did not give the partnership or partners a credit for tax paid elsewhere. The Virginia resident could claim her prorata tax paid to each state, with statements proving her share of taxable income and tax and documentation that the other state would not grant the credit.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2007. Ezel answers yours, under current Virginia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2007
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Virginia Tax Commissioner advisory ruling on one resident partner's Arizona and California unified nonresident returns under the credit rules in effect in 2007. The result depended on those unified returns not allowing a substantially similar credit and on complete prorata documentation. Other states, return types, income categories, facts, or later law can differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Virginia partner may claim credit on income tax return for tax paid to each state

Plain-English summary

Virginia allowed the resident partner to claim credits for her prorata Arizona and California income taxes paid through partnership unified nonresident returns. The key was that those unified returns did not provide the partner with a substantially similar other-state credit.

Virginia generally denied its resident credit when the other state offered a similar credit. Although Arizona and California practiced reciprocity on individual nonresident returns, their unified partnership returns did not allow the credit.

The partner had to attach statements verifying her share of the unified return's taxable income and tax paid on her behalf, plus documentation showing that each other state would not grant the credit.

What this means for you

  • Analyze the specific composite or unified return, not only the other state's general individual-credit rule.
  • Obtain partnership statements showing each owner's income and tax share.
  • Document that the other state will not provide the reciprocal credit before claiming Virginia's credit.

Citations and references

  • Va. Code § 58.1-332(A).
  • P.D. 94-355 (November 23, 1994).

Source

Original ruling text

December 5, 2007

Re: Request For Ruling: Individual Income Tax

Dear *:

This will reply to your letter in which you seek a ruling regarding application of the credit for taxes paid to other states on a unified nonresident income tax return. I apologize for the delay in responding to your letter.

FACTS

The Taxpayer is an individual domiciled in Virginia who is a partner in a partnership that has offices and conducts business both within and without Virginia. The Taxpayer participated in the filing of a unified nonresident individual income tax return with Arizona and California, both of which are reciprocity states for purposes of Va. Code § 58.1-332. Neither State allows credit on the unified nonresident return for individual income tax paid by the individual partners.

A ruling is requested to determine if a credit is allowable under Va. Code § 58.1-332 for the Taxpayer's prorata share of the individual income tax paid to each state on the composite nonresident income tax returns filed with those states.

RULING

Virginia Code § 58.1-332 A allows Virginia residents a credit on their Virginia return for income taxes paid to another state provided the income is either earned or business income. Further, this Code section states:

The credit . . . shall not be granted to a resident individual when the laws of another state, under which the income in question is subject to tax assessment, provide a credit to such resident individual substantially similar to that granted by . . . this section.

The Department has previously addressed this issue in Public Document (P.D.) 94-355 (11/23/1994). In that ruling, the Department determined that when a reciprocity state does not allow credit on a unified nonresident return for individual income tax paid to another state, the individual may claim the credit on the Virginia resident income tax return.

Both Arizona and California practice reciprocity with Virginia for purposes of claiming the individual tax credit on their nonresident individual income tax returns, but neither state provides for this credit on its unified nonresident income tax return. As such, the Virginia resident partner may claim the credit on the Virginia individual income tax return for individual income tax paid to each state.

When claiming the credit with respect to Va. Code § 58.1-332 for individual income taxes paid to another state with a composite return, a statement must be attached verifying (1) the individual's prorata portion of the unified return's taxable income, and (2) the individual's prorata portion of the tax paid to the applicable state by the partnership on the individual's behalf. In addition, documentation must be attached to the Virginia return to verify that the other state will not grant this credit. See P.D. 94-355.

The Code of Virginia section and public document cited are available online at www.tax.virginia.gov in the Tax Policy Library section of the Department's web site. If you have any questions about this ruling, you may contact * in the Office of Policy and Administration, Appeals and Rulings, at ***.

Sincerely,

Janie E. Bowen

Tax Commissioner

AR/1-1192139133E

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2007 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Virginia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.