TX 9911330L Franchise Tax (PRIOR TO 01/01/2008) 1999-11-19

Did federal tax deferral for an I.R.C. Section 1031 exchange also defer the exchange gain in the earned-surplus component of the former Texas franchise tax?

Short answer: Yes, for the earned-surplus component described. Because that component began with federal net taxable income, a corporation's federal Section 1031 tax deferral was reflected in taxable earned surplus. The former Texas franchise tax separately imposed the greater of tax on net taxable capital or net taxable earned surplus, and the letter said the franchise-tax provisions did not otherwise address Section 1031 exchanges.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1999. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1999
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. This letter applies the pre-2008 taxable-capital and earned-surplus franchise tax, including the rates and federal-income starting point then in effect; Texas replaced that tax with the margin tax effective January 1, 2008, so confirm current Texas and federal Section 1031 law. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A corporation's federal Section 1031 deferral flowed into the earned-surplus component of the former Texas franchise tax because that component began with federal net taxable income.

The letter first distinguished Texas's former corporate franchise tax from an individual income tax. A corporation paid the greater of:

  • 0.25% of net taxable capital for each privilege year; or
  • 4.5% of net taxable earned surplus.

Taxable capital generally consisted of stated capital plus surplus. Earned surplus generally began with federal net taxable income and added compensation paid to corporate officers and directors.

Because a qualifying Section 1031 exchange deferred gain for federal income-tax purposes, the earned-surplus calculation reflected that deferral. The Comptroller added that the franchise-tax provisions did not otherwise address Section 1031 exchanges.

Currency note: Texas replaced this two-component franchise tax with the margin tax effective January 1, 2008. Confirm current Texas treatment and current federal Section 1031 requirements.

What this means for you

Corporations completing deferred exchanges

Under the former earned-surplus system, the federal taxable-income result carried into the Texas calculation. The letter did not create a separate Texas exchange rule.

Tax professionals

The holding addresses earned surplus, not an exemption from the separate taxable-capital component. The corporation still paid whichever former component produced the greater tax.

Common questions

Q: Did Texas impose an individual income tax on the exchange?
A: The letter says Texas did not impose a state income tax on individuals.

Q: Did federal Section 1031 deferral carry into earned surplus?
A: Yes, because earned surplus used federal net taxable income as its starting point.

Q: Did the letter establish any other Texas Section 1031 rule?
A: No. It says the franchise-tax provisions did not otherwise address the exchange.

Citations and references

  • I.R.C. Sec. 1031 - federal tax-deferred exchange treatment

Source

Original ruling text

November 19, 1999





Dear **:

We have your recent letter requesting information about the income tax
treatment of an Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 tax deferred exchange under
Texas law.

Texas does not impose a state income tax on individuals. Texas law does
provide for a corporate franchise tax; however, the tax is not a corporate
income tax per se.

Under the franchise tax law, a corporation pays the greater of the tax on net
taxable capital or net taxable earned surplus. The tax rate on taxable capital
is 0.25 percent per year of privilege period and the tax rate on earned surplus
is 4.5 percent.

Taxable capital is a corporation's stated capital (capital stock) plus surplus.
In general, surplus is the net assets of the corporation without deduction for
estimated liabilities and asset writedowns. Certain accounting methods are
required in computing surplus.

The earned surplus component basically includes a corporation's federal net
taxable income, plus compensation paid to officers and directors of the
corporation. Consequently, if the corporation has a Section 1031 tax deferred
exchange for federal income tax, the earned surplus component for franchise tax
will reflect the deferral.

The franchise tax provisions do not otherwise address the matter of a Section
1031 exchange.

The information provided by you and current franchise tax law form the basis
for this response. Different or additional information may result in a
different response.

If you have any questions, please call me toll free at 1-800-531-5441,
extension 3-4931, or directly at 512/463-4931.

Sincerely yours,

William E. York
Tax Policy Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1999 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.