TX 9910804L Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1999-10-19

Is a company's separate contract to provide a physician with secretarial, bookkeeping, and drug-study-contract administrative support taxable as insurance claims processing or data processing services, even though the same company also does taxable medical billing for other clients?

Short answer: No. Secretarial duties, bookkeeping for the physician's outside CPA, reviewing pharmaceutical drug study contracts for fee schedules, and reconciling reimbursement checks against contract terms are not taxable insurance claims processing (they aren't performed under an insurance policy) and not taxable data processing services (they fall within Rule 3.330(a)'s exclusions), even though a computer is used and the same company separately charges tax on its insurance billing services for other work.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1999. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1999
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A business ran an insurance claims processing operation, charging sales tax on billing and insurance claims processing services it provides to physicians generally. But it also had a separate contract with one specific physician to provide administrative and management services for her pharmaceutical drug study contracts — a different scope of work: secretarial duties, bookkeeping to feed the physician's outside CPA for tax preparation, reviewing drug study contracts to determine fee schedules and required procedures, and reconciling reimbursement checks against the contract terms.

The Comptroller ruled that this separate bundle of services is not taxable, on two independent grounds: it isn't taxable insurance claims processing, because the services aren't performed pursuant to any policy or policies of insurance (the drug study contracts aren't insurance policies) — and it isn't taxable data processing services either, even though a computer is used, because the work falls within the exclusions in Rule 3.330(a) governing data processing services.

What this means for you

Medical billing and practice-management companies

Don't assume that because you charge sales tax on your core insurance claims processing work, everything else you do for the same physician client is automatically taxable too. Secretarial, bookkeeping, and contract-administration services for non-insurance matters (like pharmaceutical drug study contracts) can be a genuinely separate, nontaxable service — the taxability analysis runs contract-by-contract and service-by-service, not client-by-client.

Physicians and medical practices

If you're paying for administrative help with drug study contracts, secretarial work, or bookkeeping separate from insurance billing, that work may not carry sales tax at all — worth confirming with your service provider that they're applying the right tax treatment to each distinct service line.

Accountants and tax professionals

The key move in this letter is treating the drug-study administrative contract as analytically separate from the insurance claims processing contract, even though the same vendor performs both for the same client. Watch Rule 3.330(a)'s data processing exclusions — computer use alone doesn't make a service taxable data processing.

Common questions

Q: Is secretarial and bookkeeping support for a physician's drug study contracts taxable?
A: No — it's neither taxable insurance claims processing (no insurance policy involved) nor taxable data processing (excluded under Rule 3.330(a)), even though a computer is used.

Q: Does it matter that the same company charges sales tax on its regular insurance billing work?
A: No — the drug-study administrative services are a separate contract and are analyzed independently from the taxable insurance claims processing services.

Q: What kinds of tasks were covered by this nontaxable determination?
A: Secretarial duties, bookkeeping for an outside CPA, reviewing drug study contracts for fee schedules/procedures, and reconciling reimbursement checks against contract terms.

Citations and references

Rule:

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code § 3.330(a) (data processing services — exclusions)

Source

Original ruling text

October 19, 1999





Dear **:

Thank you for your recent letter concerning the taxability of a service you
provide for a particular physician.

You have an insurance claims processing business that provides billing and
insurance claims processing services to physicians for which you charge sales
tax. You also have a contract with one physician to provide administrative and
management services for her pharmaceutical drug study contracts. The services
performed include the following:

1) secretarial duties;

2) bookkeeping to provide financial statements to outside CPA for tax
preparation;

3) review pharmaceutical drug study contracts to determine fee schedule and
procedures required; and

4) reconcile reimbursement checks to determine if payment agrees with the
contract.

The services performed are not taxable as insurance claims processing because
they are not being performed pursuant to a policy or policies of insurance. The
services are not taxable as data processing services even if a computer is used
within the parameters of the exclusions provided in Rule 3.330(a) concerning
data processing services.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

You may call me toll free 1-800-531-5441, extension 3-4683, if you have any
questions or need more information. My direct line is 512/463-4683. You may
also write to the Tax Policy Division, Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,

Eddie C. Washington
Tax Policy Division

cc: Russ Huerta, Customer Service, Tax Assistance

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1999 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.