TX 9703283L Motor Vehicle Tax 1997-03-03

Did installing an emergency-vehicle alerting device for a deaf or hard-of-hearing driver qualify the vehicle for Texas's disability exemption?

Short answer: No. The motor vehicle tax statute described in the letter exempted vehicles modified for people with orthopedic disabilities, defined by limited movement of body extremities. A hearing deficiency did not meet that definition, so the alerting device did not qualify the vehicle.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1997
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller letter issued on one alerting-device installation question in 1997. It uses historical statutory and disability terminology quoted only to explain that ruling. The letter predates modern Private Letter Ruling reliance terms and cannot be treated by unrelated taxpayers as binding protection. Disability definitions, vehicle-modification exemptions, documentation, and terminology may have changed. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Texas Comptroller denied the motor vehicle tax exemption for a vehicle equipped with an alerting device that warned a deaf or hard-of-hearing driver about nearby emergency sirens.

The historical statute described in the letter covered a vehicle modified for a person with an orthopedic disability. It defined that status by limited movement of body extremities, and the letter said a hearing deficiency was not within that definition.

What this means for you

Adaptive-equipment installers

Installing safety equipment did not by itself bring the vehicle within the particular historical exemption.

Deaf and hard-of-hearing drivers

This 1997 letter applied a narrow orthopedic-disability definition; current exemptions should be checked under current law.

Common questions

Q: Did the alerting device qualify the vehicle for the exemption?

A: No.

Q: What limitation did the letter apply?

A: The historical exemption covered limited movement of body extremities, not hearing deficiency.

Citations and references

  • The letter described the motor vehicle tax statute without identifying a section number.

Source

Original ruling text

March 3, 1997




Dear **:

Thank you for your letter requesting tax information.

Facts: Your company installs assistive listening or "alerting devices" for
drivers who are deaf or hard of hearing. The devices alert drivers who are
deaf or hard of hearing that an emergency vehicle is in their vicinity with
siren activated. You ask if the installation of such a device would qualify a
motor vehicle for a motor vehicle sales tax exemption.

Response: The motor vehicle tax statute has no exemption for a motor vehicle
equipped with a system such as you described. The statute allows an exemption
for a motor vehicle modified for an orthopedically handicapped person. An
orthopedically handicapped person is defined as a person with limited movement
of body extremities. A hearing deficiency would not be considered an
orthopedic handicap.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion could change.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call one of our tax
specialists toll free at 1-800-252-1382. The direct number is 512/463-4600.
You may also write to Tax Policy Division, Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,
Curt Swenson
Tax Policy Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1997 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.