TX 9609777L Franchise Tax (PRIOR TO 01/01/2008) 1996-09-25

How did a Texas S corporation report recognized gain from land sold under threat of condemnation for former franchise tax?

Short answer: The recognized net gain entered both former franchise-tax components. It was included in taxable-capital surplus and earned-surplus federal taxable income, and the net gain entered both Texas receipts and receipts everywhere because the land was an investment or capital asset.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. This 1996 response applies former franchise-tax rules and depends on the corporation recognizing, rather than deferring, the involuntary-conversion gain and on the land being an investment or capital asset. Confirm current law. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Recognized net gain from the condemned land entered both former franchise-tax components and both receipt factors.

The Texas S corporation sold land under threat of condemnation and recognized the involuntary-conversion gain on its federal return instead of electing deferral.

For taxable capital, the gain entered surplus under either GAAP or the federal-income-tax reporting method. For earned surplus, it entered federal taxable income because it was reportable as taxable to the S corporation's shareholders.

For both components, the corporation included the net gain in Texas receipts and receipts everywhere. Only net gain was used because the land qualified as an investment or capital asset.

What this means for you

Businesses receiving condemnation proceeds

The former Texas treatment followed the recognized gain, not gross settlement proceeds, on these capital-asset facts.

S corporations

The lack of a federal deferral election was essential to including the gain in earned surplus.

Common questions

Q: Was the gain included in taxable capital?
A: Yes, as surplus.

Q: Was it included in earned surplus?
A: Yes, because it was recognized federally and reportable to shareholders.

Q: Did the receipts calculation use gross proceeds?
A: No. It used net gain because the land was an investment or capital asset.

Citations and references

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Sec. 3.549(e)(8), (e)(3), (b)(1), and (b)(3), as cited in the letter
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Sec. 3.557(e)(7), (e)(3), (b)(1), and (b)(6), as cited in the letter

Source

Original ruling text

September 25, 1996




Dear **:

In your letter of September 18, you requested a determination regarding the
franchise tax treatment of condemnation proceeds.

You state that CORPORATION A is an S corporation which is incorporated in
Texas. The Texas Highway Department and the City of Amarillo have begun
construction of an overpass in front of the corporation's store. In connection
with the construction project, CORPORATION A underwent an involuntary sale
under threat of condemnation of a parcel of the company's land. In 1995, the
company received a settlement in connection with the involuntary sale of land.
The proceeds were recognized as income from involuntary conversion of land in
the federal income tax return because the company did not elect to defer the
recognition of the gain.

The gain on the involuntary sale would be treated as follows for each component
of the franchise tax:

  1. For the taxable capital component, the gain would be included in surplus
    whether the corporation used the generally accepted accounting principles or
    federal income tax method for reporting purposes. Specifically, the gain would
    be income under either method. In addition, the gain from the involuntary sale
    would be used in computing Texas receipts and receipts everywhere as indicated
    in Rule 3.549(e)(8) and (e)(3) (enclosed). Only the net gain would be used
    because the land qualifies as an investment or capital asset (see Rule
    3.549(b)(1) and (b)(3)).

  2. The gain would be included in the corporation's federal taxable income in
    computing taxable earned surplus because CORPORATION A did not elect to defer
    the gain for federal income tax purposes. In particular, the franchise tax
    statute defines an S corporation's reportable federal taxable income as "...the
    amount of the income reportable to the Internal Revenue Service as taxable to
    the corporation's shareholders." . In computing receipts, the gain from the
    involuntary sale should be used in computing Texas receipts and receipts
    everywhere (see enclosed Rule 3.557(e)(7) and (e)(3)). Only the net gain would
    be used because the land qualifies as an investment or capital asset (Rule
    3.557(b)(1) and (b)(6)).

This response is based on the facts presented and current law. If there are
different or additional facts, the response may change.

If you have any questions, contact Tax Policy Division. You may call toll free
1-800-531-5441, or our regular number is 512/463-4600. My extension is 3-4662.
You may write me at Tax Policy Division, Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,

Bob Jeffcoat
Tax Policy Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.