TX 9603L1408D01 Motor Vehicle Tax 1996-03-13

When did Texas require a seller-financing dealer to pay all remaining motor vehicle tax after transferring payment rights?

Short answer: When the investor obtained the right to receive the retail purchaser's payments. The internal memo said that funding 60% of the financed amount and acquiring payment rights met § 152.047(g), even with recourse to the dealer, so the dealer had to report and pay all remaining tax in the next reporting period.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an internal Texas Comptroller Tax Policy memorandum to San Antonio Audit, not a taxpayer-specific Private Letter Ruling. It states the agency's 1996 application of Texas Tax Code § 152.047(g) and provides no individualized detrimental-reliance protection. Seller-finance, factoring, assignment, recourse, reporting-period, and accelerated-tax rules may have changed. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

This internal Texas Tax Policy memo addressed a seller-financed retail vehicle sale. After the sale, an investor funded 60% of the financed amount and obtained the right to receive the buyer's payments through the dealer as collector.

The memo said that transfer of payment rights satisfied Texas Tax Code § 152.047(g), despite the investor's recourse to the dealer if the buyer failed to pay.

The dealer therefore had to report and pay all tax remaining on the unreported consideration in the next reporting period after the investor obtained the payment rights.

What this means for you

Seller-financing dealers and auto-finance investors

Transferring the payment stream accelerated the dealer's unpaid tax under the historical memo.

Audit professionals and dealership accountants

The memo treated the right to receive payments as decisive even though the dealer still collected them and bore recourse risk.

Common questions

Q: Did recourse to the dealer prevent acceleration?

A: No.

Q: When was the remaining tax reported?

A: In the next reporting period after the investor obtained payment rights.

Citations and references

  • Texas Tax Code § 152.047(g) — cited for accelerated tax after factoring, assigning, or otherwise transferring payment rights.

Source

Original ruling text

DATE: March 13, 1996

TO: Mike Wallace, San Antonio Audit

FROM: Curt Swenson, Tax Policy

SUBJECT: **. - Seller-Financed Sales, Sale of Note

Section 152.047(g) of the Tax Code provides that if
a seller factors, assigns, or otherwise transfers the right to receive
payments, all unpaid tax is due on the total consideration not reported at the
time the agreement is factored, assigned, or otherwise transferred.

It is apparent that COMPANY A has sold the vehicle
to the retail purchaser. There is a sales/installment agreement between the
two. After the sale the investor then funds COMPANY A 60% of the financed
amount. The investor will then receive the payments (through COMPANY A as
collector) made by the retail purchaser. It is understood that the investor
has recourse to COMPANY A if all payments are not made. The recourse element
appears to be industry standard.

The investor now has the right to receive payments.
For that reason alone and perhaps others the condition set out in Section
152.047(g) has now been met and the remainder of the tax is due from COMPANY A
and should be reported and submitted in the next report period following the
investors right to receive the payments.

NOTE: Previous Accession Number 9603159L

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.