TX 9312L1274C01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1993-12-14

Is a $100 'reinstatement fee' charged to customers renewing an expired computer maintenance agreement taxable, even if it's separately stated on the invoice?

Short answer: Yes. The Comptroller ruled that the $100 reinstatement fee is taxable, even if separately stated, because it is part of the charge for computer program maintenance on software sold by the same service provider, and Rule 3.308(b)(3) makes charges for computer program maintenance by the seller of the program taxable.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Subject

Software — Maintenance Agreement Reinstatement Fee — Taxable Even If Separately Stated

Source

Plain-English Summary

A taxpayer asked the Comptroller whether a "reinstatement fee" charged to customers who wanted to renew an expired computer maintenance agreement was taxable. The Comptroller held that it is taxable. The letter explains that charges for computer program maintenance made by the same person who sold the computer program are taxable, citing Rule 3.308(b)(3) on software maintenance. Because the $100 reinstatement fee is part of the charge for computer program maintenance on software sold by this service provider, it is taxable — and that holds true even if the fee is separately stated on the bill from the rest of the maintenance charge. The letter notes it is based on the specific facts submitted and that other, similar-looking facts could yield a different result.

What This Means For You

If you sell software and also sell maintenance agreements for that same software: Charges for maintaining the program — including a fee to reinstate a lapsed maintenance agreement — are treated as taxable charges for computer program maintenance, according to this letter.

Separately stating the fee does not change the answer: The letter is explicit that even if the $100 reinstatement fee is broken out as its own line item, it is still taxable because it is part of the overall charge for maintaining computer software sold by the same provider.

Facts matter: The Comptroller notes this opinion is based on the specific facts submitted and that other, similar facts could produce a different result — so this letter should not be read as a blanket rule for every reinstatement-fee scenario.

Q&A

Q: Is the $100 reinstatement fee for renewing an expired software maintenance agreement taxable?
A: Yes. The letter states the fee is taxable because it is part of the charge for computer program maintenance on software sold by the service provider, per Rule 3.308(b)(3).

Q: Does separately stating the reinstatement fee on the invoice make it non-taxable?
A: No. The letter specifically addresses this: "Even if separately stated, the $100 'reinstatement fee' is taxable because it is part of the charge for computer program maintenance."

Q: Would this answer be different if the maintenance provider hadn't originally sold the software?
A: The letter only addresses the situation where the maintenance is provided "by the person who sold the computer program." It does not state what result would follow for a third-party maintenance provider who did not sell the software, and it cautions that other facts, though similar, may yield different results.

Original ruling text

December 14, 1993




Dear**:

Thank you for your letter concerning the taxability of a
"reinstatement fee" charge to customers wishing to renew expired
computer maintenance agreements.

Charges for computer program maintenance by the person who sold
thecomputer program are taxable. See enclosed Rule 3.308(b)(3)
regarding software maintenance. Even if separately stated, the $100
"reinstatement fee" is taxable because it is part of the charge
for computer program maintenance on software sold by the service
provider.

This opinion is based on the facts you submitted. Other facts,
though similar, may yield different results.

You may call me toll free at 1-800-531-5441, ext. 5-0030. The
direct line is 512/475-0030. You may also write to Tax
Administration, Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,

David Somerville
Tax Administration Division

NOTE: Previous Accession Number 9311126L.2 and/or 9311126L

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1993 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.